开云体育

? I guess you are trying to send a picture of your hardware,but all I get is a 214 byte piece of trim like thing. No matter, those of us in the biz know what you are talking about. ? ?I had the

I would also question the need/want for a voice ID on P25, though if adjusted properly and unlike most voice IDs it may work well. As for how, it greatly depends on your equipment. Often P25

Not quite. It is ti ID every 10 minutes when a QSO is going on, along with CW ID, a voice would be nice. It does ID with CW now. I know commercial P-25s are ti ID every 15 minutes! On them, I

Jed, The first thing you are going to need if you are going to attempt this personally is a very large liability insurance policy. Simulcast, particularly for public safety is not something

Personally I don't see the need - but - There are two options that could work for this. One is to use the wireline input and use analog for your voice announcement. The other is to use a surplus

And who is going to hear it anyway? It won't come thru your P25 radio

I am interested in that as well! ____________________________________________________________________________________________ *Seven Three* Ed McKinney - KB8QEU

Hi, sorry I did mean the multiplier injection casting. I understand there was a better replacement for them… Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:47 PM To:

Why ruin a good repeater with junk like that P25 is supposed to bequiet. To: Repeater-Builder@... Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 9:43 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Voice ID'er for

? ? Are you talking about the front end and multiplier/injection casting? ? I have apparently missed out on some other kind of "metal Flaking" if so. ? THe castings are famous for tuning screw to

Does anyone know where I can find one of the better, modified vhf IF tuning coil modules that doesn't have the metal flaking problems.? I understand there was a better one that is not prone to

Looking for just a voice identifier for a P25 repeater. Any suggestions?

The design bug in the RTCM is easily and effectively remedied, as documented in the videos I mentioned above. Excellent results. BTW as I recall WB6NIL (the inventor of the original "voter board"

2.5 inchs, is that bare foot or with shoe's? and pointing south east, that's for north hemisphere, what about in the southern hemisphere? Our aussie friend could be led to point to the wrong

Thank you for all the input. I know a diplexer would be needed at the bottom side at a minimum in addition to the Bp/Br duplexers for each repeater. The topside is what I was wondering about. The

Dude, no! Set up a private node not affiliated with Allstarlink registry and deploy a few RTCMs and go look what joe KC2IRV did with disciplining the 9.6MHz clock of the RTCM's PIC to GPS, along with

Does injecting instead of CTCSS, using DCS or digital squelch. What about instead using P25 or a DMR variant? I agree with others, those Quantar's should stay in service. Decent machines. We run a

One of the old simulcast solutions would be to have a master CTCSS oscillator at the control point and send the tone to all the transmit sites.? If you used RF links and they had flat audio response,

Looking at the license and contacting them a few years back produced that answer to me. - - David E Thurman Australian Shepherd Rescue Midwest www.aussierescueil.com President (309) 863-5211 Ext

We use the RTCM/Voter boards in a simulcast environment here. I have a UHF repeater with two sites currently (three sites are voted). They work well and there is no discernible CTCSS tone buzz or