¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: HELP WITH SWITCHING POWER SUPPLY

Jack Jackson
 

Hi Mike,

Have used Duracom and Astron switching supplies on VHF & UHF repeaters and
paging systems for about 6 years with NO problems. They run much cooler and
do a great job. You will not have any noise problems unless you use the
supply on an HF rig!

73's Jack WB4EFZ

----- Original Message -----
From: <HQ54@...>
To: <Repeater-builder@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 1999 9:01 AM
Subject: [Repeater-builder] HELP WITH SWITCHING POWER SUPPLY


From: HQ54@...



Hi All,

I recently purchased a Switching power supply. It was rated at
considerably more amperage then most of the REGULAR power supplies I had
seen, and was more affordable, so I had to buy it. I have since learnt
that
switchers often cause some sort of interference, especially at the VHF
frequency range. I have also heard that there is a way to either elimate
or
considerably reduce this interference. Does anyone out there know how to
accomplish this, or know where I might be able to get that info. I have
yet
to attempt to use the unit, but I would like to be prepared incase I need
to
do something.

Thanx in advance for the help
Mike

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know that we add over 1,000 new e-mail communities every day?

Explore a new hobby, discover a new friend, laugh at a new joke!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by the owners and users of "RBTIP"


Repeater Antennas

drreality
 

Hi Guys: I am working on putting a repeater together with a few other
folks help, and I am in need of a reccomendation of a good UHF repeater
antenna. I have seen a few of the DB products antennas and called them
about an antenna that would work for amateur UHF purposes. They
informed me that they do not build an antenna for the Amateur UHF
frequencies. I would like to stay away from the fiberglass antennas
also. The local repeater here used one for a while but the noise
buildup sometimes made the repeater almost useless to use. The
frequency for this new repeater is on 442.700 Mhz. Any help you folks
could reccomend would be appreciated.

Terry
KF0AO


(thanks) coating Al+++

Mike Hamann
 

Hey there!
Many well thought out reply posts to my query "what to
coat Aluminum (metal) antennas with".
Condensing the solutions offered:
1.) (solvent-thinned) rubberized "tool coating"
2.) Liquid RTV (solvent-thinned RTV)
3.) auto body "chip guard" plastic coating
4.) maybe stainless steel antennae?
5.) epoxy (aircraft) paint
6.) exterior acrylic (clear)
7.) Sherwin-Williams polyurethane enamel (per Celwave)
Now, those all look viable; Now I have to calculate which
one(s) will
cost me the least $$ and be the easiest to apply. I think I
can handle this part of the equation <g>.

Thanks to all who participated!!
Mike, wb6csh@...


Re: Repeater Antennas

Justin Reed
 

At 15:37 4/24/99 -0500, you wrote:
From: drreality <drreality@...>

Hi Guys: I am working on putting a repeater together with a few other
folks help, and I am in need of a reccomendation of a good UHF repeater
antenna. I have seen a few of the DB products antennas and called them
about an antenna that would work for amateur UHF purposes. They
informed me that they do not build an antenna for the Amateur UHF
frequencies. I would like to stay away from the fiberglass antennas
also. The local repeater here used one for a while but the noise
buildup sometimes made the repeater almost useless to use. The
frequency for this new repeater is on 442.700 Mhz. Any help you folks
could reccomend would be appreciated.
The decibel products folded dipole antennas cut for the 450 to 470 MHz
range work just perfectly in the 440-450 ham band. My repeater is living
proof. Others in my area are using the same thing. They are fairly broad
banded, and they work fine. I replaced my so-called diamond X500 HNA
antenna with "11 dB" of gain with a DB products antenna with 6 dB gain and
i actually gained a field strength of 3 dB. Go figure, i guess.

Justin and Kim Reed
NUJQ and KBNTH
910 N. Argyle
Minneapolis, Kansas 67467

e-mail: jreed@...

The N0UJQ Homepage


Re: Squelch Board

Walter Isaacson
 

Yes. The part number is RLC-MOT and sells for $59.95.
--
Allan Overcast WWW:
Link Communications, Inc. Phone: (406) 245-5002 x 103
MailTo:allan@... Fax: (406) 245-4889
Nothing like getting it right from the horses mouth....<grin> (sorry Allan)


Re: Congress and Email

Barry L. Aubrey
 

Thanks very much Kevin, seems like some people just don't get it!

"Kevin K. Custer W3KKC" wrote:

Please do not SPAM this or any other email list, or you will be
removed.

That's your first warning. That's your only warning.
One more and you are gone.

Kevin Custer,
List Owner





"Charles D. Miller" wrote:


* BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *

On 4/21/99 at 8:39 AM George A. Rice, Jr. <garice@...> wrote:

CNN reported that in the next two weeks,
Start of snippage of
SPAM..................................


Re: Canadian Marconi "MARCOM V" Programming

"Fred Chamberlain" <[email protected]
 

at which address does the data go into the prom.... is there an address for
each code segemnt for each indivadual channel

I just need to decifer the sequence inorder to program.

I don't have the tone board I Guess. That's ok i can incode at the mike if
needed.

Fred Chamberlain
ve3cfz@...

From: Ken Whalen <techline@...>
chan
1 144.490 RX/TX F2 F0 F0 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F2 F2 F3 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
2 144.970 RX/TX F2 F2 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F2 F0 F5 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
3 145.010 RX/TX FA F2 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F0 F5 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
4 145.110 RX 144.510 TX FE F3 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F2 F3 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
5 146.520 RX/TX F8 F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
6 146.530 RX/TX FA F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
7 146.540 RX/TX FC F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
8 146.640 RX 146.040 TX F0 F3 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F1 F8 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
9 146.91 RX 146.31 TX F6 F2 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F0 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
10 147.060 RX 146.460 TX F4 F0 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F2 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
11 147.060 RX 147.660 TX F4 F0 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F1 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
12 147.15 RX 147.750 TX F6 F1 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F2 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
13 147.210 RX 147.810 TX F2 F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F3 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
14 147.240 RX 147.840 TX F8 F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F0 F0 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0
15 147.270 RX 147.870 TX FE F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F0 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0
16 147.390 RX 147.990 TX F6 F0 F9 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F1 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0


147.12+ F0 F1 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F2 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
146.94- FC F2 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F4 F1 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
147.03- FE F3 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F2 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0


My apology

Charles D. Miller
 

My apology to the list for the FWD E-Mail: Congress.

I intended to send it to only 2 groups, but a small typo sent it
to ALL groups.

I have taken the necessary measures to prevent this problem in
the future.

I know I have made several list moderators upset, mad or
whathaveyou. To them my deepest apologies.
Charles D. Miller
E-Mail: cdmiller@...


Re: Ge S-550 control head

 

I have some scan boards. can you give me the GE "19" number for it?

Kevin


Voter Description

Cris Caraballo
 

Thanks to all who have responded on the list serv and privately. After
reading the responses and web pages I now have a better idea of how a voter
works and where to start troubleshooting.
Thanks again
Cris KE4IIF


Re: New at building a repeater

Brent DeSalvo KF4TNP
 

Same Hear , not to take anything from anybody but i have found the NHRC DAD to
work well take a look at



Walter Isaacson wrote:

From: "Walter Isaacson" <isaacow@...>

That's odd. I've always used

In any case, not to take anything away from Link Comm, but why not spend
50 bucks on an audio delay board from S*Com? Strong signal or weak - no
squelch crash. :) From what I recall, the RLC-SQL was (is) more than
that and only reduces the crash on strong signals.
Thats what I have in my bookimarks. It puts you directly on their catalog
page. Mind you that bookmark is 3 years old.
We use the RLC audio delay boards. The audio delay boards doesn't address
the problem of weak and fluttery signals.
So far we use the audio delay boards here in Calgary. We use them on our
RLC-2A. We also use a few RLC-4s

Walter
VE6ANI
Home Page:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know that we add over 1,000 new e-mail communities every day?

Explore a new hobby, discover a new friend, laugh at a new joke!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by the owners and users of "RBTIP"

--
Brent DeSalvo (KF4TNP)

Grid Square: EM65
ICQ UIN# : 17430698
Mailto:bug1@...


[Fwd: Squelch Board]

Chance
 


Re: New at building a repeater

Walter Isaacson
 

That's odd. I've always used

In any case, not to take anything away from Link Comm, but why not spend
50 bucks on an audio delay board from S*Com? Strong signal or weak - no
squelch crash. :) From what I recall, the RLC-SQL was (is) more than
that and only reduces the crash on strong signals.
Thats what I have in my bookimarks. It puts you directly on their catalog
page. Mind you that bookmark is 3 years old.
We use the RLC audio delay boards. The audio delay boards doesn't address
the problem of weak and fluttery signals.
So far we use the audio delay boards here in Calgary. We use them on our
RLC-2A. We also use a few RLC-4s

Walter
VE6ANI
Home Page:


Re: Congress and Email

Kevin K. Custer W3KKC
 

Please do not SPAM this or any other email list, or you will be removed.

That's your first warning. That's your only warning.
One more and you are gone.

Kevin Custer,
List Owner





"Charles D. Miller" wrote:


* BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *

On 4/21/99 at 8:39 AM George A. Rice, Jr. <garice@...> wrote:

CNN reported that in the next two weeks,
Start of snippage of SPAM..................................


Re: Canadian Marconi "MARCOM V" Programming

Ken Whalen <[email protected]
 

Fred,
This is the codes you requested for the Canadian Marconi Marcom 5 VHF
Mobile. ETS/CTCSS requires an add on board that plugs into the 28 pin
header located just behind the head. Two types of ETS boards are
available, a single tone and a multi-tone board. The Multi-Tone board is
controlled by the 1/10 buttons next to the mike jack.

Hope this helps.

Ken
vo1st@...


chan
1 144.490 RX/TX F2 F0 F0 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F2 F2 F3 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
2 144.970 RX/TX F2 F2 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F2 F0 F5 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
3 145.010 RX/TX FA F2 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F0 F5 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
4 145.110 RX 144.510 TX FE F3 F1 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F2 F3 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
5 146.520 RX/TX F8 F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
6 146.530 RX/TX FA F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
7 146.540 RX/TX FC F1 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F3 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
8 146.640 RX 146.040 TX F0 F3 F6 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F1 F8 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
9 146.91 RX 146.31 TX F6 F2 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F0 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
10 147.060 RX 146.460 TX F4 F0 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F2 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
11 147.060 RX 147.660 TX F4 F0 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FC F1 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
12 147.15 RX 147.750 TX F6 F1 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F2 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
13 147.210 RX 147.810 TX F2 F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FA F3 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
14 147.240 RX 147.840 TX F8 F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F0 F0 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0
15 147.270 RX 147.870 TX FE F2 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F0 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0
16 147.390 RX 147.990 TX F6 F0 F9 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 FE F1 FE FC F1 F6 F9 F0


147.12+ F0 F1 F8 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F8 F2 FD FC F1 F6 F9 F0
146.94- FC F2 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F4 F1 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0
147.03- FE F3 F7 F8 F1 F6 F9 F0 F6 F2 F9 FC F1 F6 F9 F0

On April 21, 1999 11:28 PM, Fred Chamberlain [SMTP:ve3cfz@...] wrote:
: From: "Fred Chamberlain" <ve3cfz@...>
:
: I'm Looking for the Programing Code for the RX and TX Frequencies in the
: Amatuer portion of the "MARCOM V" frequency Range 132-155
:
: any work sheets on frequency formulas, and channel addresses would be
: appreciated.
:
: Fred Chamberlain
: ve3cfz@...
:
:
: ------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Did you know that ONElist hosts some of the largest lists on the
Internet?
:
: Our scaleable system is the most reliable free e-mail service on the
Internet!
: ------------------------------------------------------------------------
: This list is sponsored by the owners and users of "RBTIP"
:
:


Re: Coating Aluminum

Richard D. Reese
 

"Ed Bathgate, RMA Repair Dept x8785" wrote:

Has anybody used epoxy paint?

I have heard of it being used for plastic/fiberglass
dirtbike parts that flex a lot.
I have seen it sold in spray cans for kitchen appliance
refinishing.

What do they paint airplanes with?
That should work well on a antenna.

$.0179 (not quite worth 2 cents)

Ed N3SDO
Ed & All,

Some years ago I requested a recommendation from Celwave as to what to
repaint antennas with. What they sent me is posted at:


I have had good luck with the Polyurethane Enamel that they recommended. I
have used this on home brew aluminum, copper, and brass antennas also with
no ill effects.

Rich Reese


Re: Congress and Email

Barry L. Aubrey
 

This appeared everywhere on the net over a year ago. VERY PHONY!

KEITH WELLS wrote:

This is not a true statement look at this web site



* BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *

On 4/21/99 at 8:39 AM George A. Rice, Jr. <garice@...> wrote:

CNN reported that in the next two weeks, Congress is going
to vote on allowing telephone companies to charge for
Internet access. That means, every time we make a long
distance email we will receive a long distance charge.
This will get costly. Please visit to the following web
site and complain. Complain to your Congressman. Don't
allow this to pass.
(THIS IS A PAGE I'M GOING TO
USE MORE OFTEN !!!!!) Pass this on to your friends. It is
URGENT!I hope all of you will pass this on to all your
friends and family. All of us have an interest in this
one. PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW TODAY BEFORE IT
IS TOO LATE!!!! This message was received from a friend
and I am passing it on. George / Bennye Rice

* END FORWARDED MESSAGE *

Charles D. Miller
E-Mail: cdmiller@...


Re: Congress and Email

Charles D. Miller
 

Thanks for the info Keith.
Charles D. Miller
E-Mail: cdmiller@...


Re: Congress and Email

KEITH WELLS
 



sorry wrong paste
KEITH WELLS wrote:

This is not a true statement look at this web site


* BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *

On 4/21/99 at 8:39 AM George A. Rice, Jr. <garice@...> wrote:

CNN reported that in the next two weeks, Congress is going
to vote on allowing telephone companies to charge for
Internet access. That means, every time we make a long
distance email we will receive a long distance charge.
This will get costly. Please visit to the following web
site and complain. Complain to your Congressman. Don't
allow this to pass.
(THIS IS A PAGE I'M GOING TO
USE MORE OFTEN !!!!!) Pass this on to your friends. It is
URGENT!I hope all of you will pass this on to all your
friends and family. All of us have an interest in this
one. PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW TODAY BEFORE IT
IS TOO LATE!!!! This message was received from a friend
and I am passing it on. George / Bennye Rice

* END FORWARDED MESSAGE *

Charles D. Miller
E-Mail: cdmiller@...


Re: Congress and Email

KEITH WELLS
 

This is not a true statement look at this web site


* BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *

On 4/21/99 at 8:39 AM George A. Rice, Jr. <garice@...> wrote:

CNN reported that in the next two weeks, Congress is going
to vote on allowing telephone companies to charge for
Internet access. That means, every time we make a long
distance email we will receive a long distance charge. This
will get costly. Please visit to the following web site and
complain. Complain to your Congressman. Don't allow this
to pass. (THIS IS
A PAGE I'M GOING TO USE MORE OFTEN !!!!!) Pass this on to
your friends. It is URGENT!I hope all of you will pass this
on to all your friends and family. All of us have an
interest in this one. PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW
TODAY BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!! This message was received
from a friend and I am passing it on. George / Bennye Rice

* END FORWARDED MESSAGE *

Charles D. Miller
E-Mail: cdmiller@...