¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: ID-O-Matic IV Controller setup with Kenwood TKR-850
No problem. Glad to hear that I could be of help. No, I haven't noticed any background noise. Are you hearing a hum? How does the quality of the audio sound? Are you using the RA (pin11) and TA (pin
By Joe · #183782 ·
Re: Kenwood tkr-840 alignment steps
Woody, This has been discussed before in some detail. These repeaters work very well in the ham band provided they are not a -2 which is high split (480-520MHz) and the low split -3 which is in "govt.
By Rick E · #183781 ·
Re: ID-O-Matic IV Controller setup with Kenwood TKR-850
Jim / Joe Thank you for your feedback, After setting TOR function Controller started to work. Also I apologize for late response, but last week was really busy at work. Joe, I have noticed that after
By KD9QPL Piotr · #183780 ·
Re: Tuning procedure for Mobile Duplexer TFE6030A
IIRC these are three resonators on one side, and one on the other. The additional adjustments were loading caps that largely effected insertion loss on the RX path.? It's been 20 years since I fussed
By Oz-in-DFW · #183779 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
Mike, I had the same issue at a repeater site with 4 FB Broadcast stations on the same tower as my VHF two meter repeater. The repeater is a Kenwood TKR-750 version 2. I purchased an FM Block filter
By Nelson J Linkous Ii <nlinkous@...> · #183778 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
Well look at it this way: you can re-use that repeater's input for a link or even a repeater output & no one would even know ;) Bob NO6B
By Bob Dengler · #183777 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
I troubleshot a dense electronic site interference problem in which a 20 kW FM transmitter was interfering with some FAA receivers. Turning off the FM transmitter didn¡¯t help. Then turning off the
By Mike Langner <mlangner@...> · #183776 ·
Re: Kenwood tkr-840 alignment steps
Did you mean 444.620? 144.620 is 2 bands below 70cm? Sent using SMTP.
By Eric Fort · #183775 ·
Kenwood tkr-840 alignment steps
I recently picked up a Kenwood tkr-840 that's a K1 model. Default band is 450-480Mhz. I want to dial it down for 70cm around 144.620. I already have it programmed to this freq and ready, modified the
By Kevin Woodyard · #183774 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
Yes, cabinet radiation I believe is the culprit because the FM TX has a bandpass. 88.9MHz * 5 = 444.5 UHF ham RX = 444.625 Whenever broadcast turns off, the problem goes away. wrote:
By Skyler Fennell · #183773 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
wonder if all his receivers are desensed by other TXs. ________________________________ Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:01 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject:
By peter oesterle <phoesterle@...> · #183772 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
MMDVM can switch modes on the fly based on what it decodes. MMDVM does not include the CODECs necessary to transform the various digital coding to analog or a generic format like PCM, etc. Cort
By Cort Buffington, N0MJS · #183771 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
We¡¯ve got some alligator repeaters here linked to a larger link system. They are so bad, you have to visually see the tower with 50 watts to hit it, but you can hear it out forever along with the
By Skyler Fennell · #183770 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
So, anyway, getting back on topic, can anyone say whether an MMDVM can switch decode modes on the fly based on incoming data? I've looked, and cannot find that answered anywhere. Can it then output
By Jim Barbour · #183769 ·
Re: Another basic digital voice question.
Well, that's a pretty "out there" interpretation. There can be no rules against streaming audio from radio source onto the internet. The *only* restrictions would be content that is copyrighted.
By Jim Barbour · #183768 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
he needs siver wire to his speakers ________________________________ Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:04 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re:
By peter oesterle <phoesterle@...> · #183767 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
I have had several 850 and 750 Kenwoods in operation and the only problem I had was PA problems on both,but they were V1 units. Most have been replaced with V2 units now unfortunately due to bad
By Wayne · #183766 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
Hum in an amplifier ¨C did the hum go away ? _____________________________________________________ According to him, it did. But after he spent that money, I¡¯m sure he would say it had whether or
By Mike Langner <mlangner@...> · #183764 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
Did the hum go away after he installed that transformer? -- The Real RFI-EMI-GUY
By RFI-EMI-GUY · #183763 ·
Re: Why use a purpose built repeater box as a repeater rather than a transmitter, receiver, and controller tied (lashed) together?
There is sometimes confusion as to what flat audio actually means and how to accommodate it. In monitoring the linked UHF SARNET system here in FL, some of the repeater nodes are very tinny suggesting
By RFI-EMI-GUY · #183762 ·