Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
RF Power Transistors
I've recently been testing a 14Mc power amp circuit, comparing several output transistors for 5 watts (45 Vpp) into a measured 50 ohm dummy load. I put a scope probe on the output and adjust for 45 Vpp with bench power? supply set to 12.8 volts. I've found that a good transistor will give 5 watts out at that frequency at 12.8 volts. My reference has been a genuine 2SC5739. I adjust the input power from the function generator to give 45 Vpp output with the reference, then substitute other transistors to see how they compare. For instance the 2SC2078 is a popular transistor used in many CB radios as the final transistor. I have several genuine 2078s as pulls from old CBs (all over 10 years old) found in thrift shops. Most of them have a blown output transistor, but the few that are good I save the transistors. A good 2078 will give 46 Vpp or sometimes a little more output compared to the reference 5739. If you look on eBay there are literally hundreds of sellers of the 2078--the majority of them from China. I found a US seller offering 10 of them for a reasonable price and bought them to test. Every single one was a fake counterfeit with 30-35 Vpp output at 14Mc! When I complained, I was given a full refund. Someone sent me two 2078s to test, bought from a reputable US seller that most of us have bought from. Both of these too were fake counterfeits with 30-35 Vpp output. My last purchase of 2078s was from another US seller on eBay--his ad shows testing them on a Peak meter--he tests them for beta (gain) at the low currents any of these test meters can only test at. I corresponded with the seller, saying such a test at such low currents didn't tell much, that a real test would be for output power. He responded that he could only test the way he was showing but that previous purchasers seemed to be happy with these 2078s. I bought 5 of them to test--they finally arrived today, after 12 days! He's in Las Vegas, only a day or two mail time from me in Arizona,? so for unknown reasons he appears to be very slow in shipping. I immediately tested all 5 and I'm very happy to report they all passed--3 gave 46 Vpp output, the other two 45.7 and 45.6 Vpp--exceeding the reference 5739 set for 45 Vpp. So these are the first Chinese 2SC2078s I can recommend, if you're looking for a decent RF power transistor. is the item and seller. Again note that you'll probably wait quite awhile to get these.
(Email me privately if you want to know who the other seller of the fake ones is that I tested, I don't want to give his name out publicly since I've bought many things from him over the years and this is the first time I've seen fake counterfeit parts from him. Hopefully this particular part is the only fake part he's selling--listed as 2SC2078.) 73, Steve AA7U |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 05:11 PM, Steve Ratzlaff wrote:
He's in Las Vegas, only a day or two mail time from me in Arizona,? so for unknown reasons he appears to be very slow in shipping.Thank you Steve - I ordered a few. I think that if sellers are slow to ship, they should set expectations, by saying something like, "I only ship at weekends. If you order on Monday, your order will ship out the following Saturday" - or something like that. That way, buyers know what to expect. As long as I know my order will be taken care of at some point, I don't usually care too much about the swiftness, as long as I know in advance. I did just notice that on my order page, it gives delivery dates of May 10 - May 19th. I guess that's good enough, though an explanation, even if brief, would help. ?
I ordered a few of these 2078's. Never know when I might need them for future projects. High gain NPN bipolars for HF finals seem to be hard to get hold of these days. I wonder what manufacturers are using for finals in CB's now - MOSFETS perhaps?
?
Dave
AA7EE |
Here is the schematic of the PA transistor test fixture I'm using, and a picture of it with a reference 2SC5739 installed.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It's easy and fast to simply bend the base and collector leads out at right angles, solder the base and collector to the appropriate leads, then solder the (unbent) emitter lead to the ground plane--and easy to remove it to test another PA transistor.? I use a 12 watt QRP dummy load, such as the one qrpguys.com sell, and mine measures 50.06 ohms, so the formula (Vpp squared/400 = watts) is appropriate. 45 Vpp gives a solid 5 watts output. I set the bench supply to 12.8 VDC for the test. Note the initial power seen on the oscope is the peak value as the transistor will immediately start to heat and power will decrease--only key down as long as it takes to read the voltage on the oscope. My oscope (Siglent DSO) shows the Vpp instantly as soon as I press the "key" button switch, so I'm looking at the oscope to catch the initial peak voltage. Once you've set the RF input to give the 45 Vpp output with the reference transistor, remove the supply voltage, remove the transistor and install another transistor to compare to the reference. Of course don't change the RF input level from the setting used for the reference transistor. If you have not tried to purchase a QRP-power level RF PA transistor recently, be aware that most of them on eBay and Amazon are fake counterfeits and will not perform anywhere close to what a genuine transistor of the same type will. That includes ones such as 2N3866, 2N5109, 2SC5739, 2SC2078, 2SC2166, 2SC1969--and it doesn't matter who the seller is. All the eBay sellers from China, in my experience, their transistors are all fake counterfeits. 73, Steve AA7U On 4/28/2025 5:11 PM, Steve Ratzlaff via groups.io wrote:
I've recently been testing a 14Mc power amp circuit, comparing several output transistors for 5 watts (45 Vpp) into a measured 50 ohm dummy load. I put a scope probe on the output and adjust for 45 Vpp with bench power? supply set to 12.8 volts. I've found that a good transistor will give 5 watts out at that frequency at 12.8 volts. My reference has been a genuine 2SC5739. I adjust the input power from the function generator to give 45 Vpp output with the reference, then substitute other transistors to see how they compare. For instance the 2SC2078 is a popular transistor used in many CB radios as the final transistor. I have several genuine 2078s as pulls from old CBs (all over 10 years old) found in thrift shops. Most of them have a blown output transistor, but the few that are good I save the transistors. A good 2078 will give 46 Vpp or sometimes a little more output compared to the reference 5739. If you look on eBay there are literally hundreds of sellers of the 2078--the majority of them from China. I found a US seller offering 10 of them for a reasonable price and bought them to test. Every single one was a fake counterfeit with 30-35 Vpp output at 14Mc! When I complained, I was given a full refund. Someone sent me two 2078s to test, bought from a reputable US seller that most of us have bought from. Both of these too were fake counterfeits with 30-35 Vpp output. My last purchase of 2078s was from another US seller on eBay--his ad shows testing them on a Peak meter--he tests them for beta (gain) at the low currents any of these test meters can only test at. I corresponded with the seller, saying such a test at such low currents didn't tell much, that a real test would be for output power. He responded that he could only test the way he was showing but that previous purchasers seemed to be happy with these 2078s. I bought 5 of them to test--they finally arrived today, after 12 days! He's in Las Vegas, only a day or two mail time from me in Arizona,? so for unknown reasons he appears to be very slow in shipping. I immediately tested all 5 and I'm very happy to report they all passed--3 gave 46 Vpp output, the other two 45.7 and 45.6 Vpp--exceeding the reference 5739 set for 45 Vpp. So these are the first Chinese 2SC2078s I can recommend, if you're looking for a decent RF power transistor. is the item and seller. Again note that you'll probably wait quite awhile to get these. |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes, 0.1uF, standard bypass cap--I didn't notice I hadn't labeled it until now.?? :) Steve On 4/29/2025 12:38 PM, Doug Hendricks
via groups.io wrote:
|
Steve,
?
Thanks for the link and schematic. I was going to order some but it looks like he is out of stock.
?
We can fall back to Dan's Small Parts.?
?
Mike N2MS?
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Mike, Yes, I see folks bought his remaining stock after I posted about it. But he emailed me today that he has 100 on order, but didn't say when they're expected. First person to notice his ad shows more, please let us all know.?? :) Unfortunately, I cannot recommend buying 2SC2078's from Dan's
Small Parts--the ones I recently tested are fake counterfeits with
very low output.... This is the first time I've had bad parts from
him. 73, Steve AA7U
On 4/29/2025 1:45 PM, Mike N2MS via
groups.io wrote:
|
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:00 PM, Steve Ratzlaff wrote:
Unfortunately, I cannot recommend buying 2SC2078's from Dan's Small Parts--the ones I recently tested are fake counterfeits with very low output.... This is the first time I've had bad parts from him.I can corroborate what Steve said about the 2078's from Dan's. I also bought some TA7642's from him recently, just for fun. They're the TRF AM radio on a chip - similar to the ZN414. I built a little AM radio in an England's Glory matchbox as a kid, and thought it would be fun to build another one, as a break from the more involved radio projects I construct these days. I'm hoping these chips are good. ?
I've had some good stuff from him over the years, so hopefully this was a one-off.
?
Dave
AA7EE |
Steve,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for the update. Sorry to hear about Dan's Small Parts. Maybe his suppliers are drying up. Did you ever evaluate is RCA4013 transistors? I have a handful of them. 73 Mike N2MS On 04/29/2025 5:00 PM EDT Steve Ratzlaff via groups.io <ratzlaffsteve@...> wrote: |
Hi Mike,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
No, I have not tried any of Dan's other RF power transistors, just the 2SC2078. If you wanted to send me one of your other ones I'd be happy to check it out and return it to you. 73, Steve AA7U On 4/29/2025 5:36 PM, Mike N2MS via groups.io wrote:
Steve, |
Steve,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Since you publoshed the circuit I will build it and test them out. 73 Mike N2MS On 04/29/2025 8:50 PM EDT Steve Ratzlaff via groups.io <ratzlaffsteve@...> wrote: |
As a side note, looking at Dan's site just now, I notice he lists manufacturers such as Motorola for some of his RF transistors, and doesn't list anything for others, such as the 2SC2078. Knowing what I now know about his 2078, I wonder if the ones that don't list anything are also potential counterfeits....
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Steve AA7U On 4/29/2025 5:36 PM, Mike N2MS via groups.io wrote:
Steve, |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:06 PM, Steve Ratzlaff wrote:
As a side note, looking at Dan's site just now, I notice he lists manufacturers such as Motorola for some of his RF transistorsOn another side note (this one very much a side note), in addition to some of the now seemingly substandard 2SC2078's I bought from Dan, I also bought some metal can Jan 2N2222A's. I was thinking that the metal cans would dissipate heat better, especially if fitted with heatsinks. Useful for QRPp PA's - or so I thought. Then I read something by Hans Summers in the QRP Labs group, in which he was saying that he had been thinking along the same lines. However, Dave NM0S told him that the modern plastic PN2222A's have higher power dissipation. Apparently, it is all due to the way the junction is bonded to the surrounding enclosure. He said that the SMT versions have even higher power dissipation. ?
As it turns out, the only good reason for my buying these metal can 2N2222A's was nostalgia, for all the stuff I built with metal can transistors as a kid. Oh well - you live and learn.
?
Dave
AA7EE |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss