Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
I have also wondered if a double balanced diode ring mixer with the usual ft43-10's will work in place of the modules as they are usually listed. I can make a DBDRM for a few cents compared to
By
Ryan Flowers
·
#249
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
Jerry, I will look at your circuit. One of things was wondering about was whether diode ring mixers would wprk in lieu of the minimodules. I suppose the only group project PCB possible would be from a
By
Curt
·
#248
·
|
Re: Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!
Thanks for the new group. Homebrew is by far the most interesting part of the hobby. Currently working on a transceiver. It started on 40m and currently works on 60m. I plan to make it properly
By
Richard Tomlinson G4TGJ
·
#247
·
|
Re: Stockton vs Resistive SWR Bridge
home brewed: http://www.learnmorsecode.com/SWRmeter/index.html
By
Rob <roomberg@...>
·
#246
·
|
Re: Norcal 40a (Was Re: [qrptech] Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!)
The schematic IS IN the manual.? I know there was some difference to the earlier manual/schematic, I had to update my PCB design during my build. 73, Gary WB6OGD
By
wb6ogd
·
#245
·
|
Re: Stockton vs Resistive SWR Bridge
Hey Gang...I've been selling Stockton Bridges since the cows came home. http://kitsandparts.com/bridge1.4.php Simple and inexpensive...you provide teh meters. 73, DIz, W8DIZ
By
w8diz
·
#244
·
|
Re: Stockton vs Resistive SWR Bridge
The Sandford Wattmeter is temporarily discontinued but I believe Kanga UK may have 1 or 2 left (none in the states).? It's a fantastic power meter but does not measure SWR.? The "Oner" Stockton
By
John Clements
·
#243
·
|
Re: Norcal 40a (Was Re: [qrptech] Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!)
Just to clarify (correct me, please, if I'm wrong):? The "RevE" designation refers only to the schematic, not to the manual. Agree--it's an excellent manual. Jerry AA6KI Tucson
By
bleepingbeep
·
#242
·
|
Re: Stockton vs Resistive SWR Bridge
I have and use both types.? The resistive bridge has the advantage that the transmitter never sees an SWR above 3:1, even across an open or a dead short, so it's easier on the transmitter.? I break
By
Eric Forman
·
#241
·
|
Re: Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!
Thank you for setting up the group.? I find that I learn more by listening than by talking, so I don't usually say too much.? I've learned a lot from this group and hope to see it continue. -Eric
By
Eric Forman
·
#240
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
I've built this receiver but had a few changes to Rick's design.? His diplexers were extremely complex and I ended up using a simple diplexer from "Solid State Design for the Radio Amateur"
By
Jerry Wolczanski
·
#239
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
Graham, your understanding is generally correct as long as it¡¯s not a ¡°derivative work¡± of Dr. C¡¯s artwork. A simple approach, of course, is to just ask Dr. Campbell if he owns the copyright
By
Scott McDonald
·
#238
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
Rick Campbell KK7B or if you prefer Dr. Campbell of Portland State University has published much over the years. A number of his designs were available through Kanga USA but sadly the proprietor has
By
Graham <colonelkrypton@...>
·
#237
·
|
Re: Stockton vs Resistive SWR Bridge
I have the Kanga Kits Stockton bridge and it works well for testing up to 20 W output and down to 1 W. Also has an output for a scope. It is my favorite and I have 3 different SWR/dummy loads. I got
By
David Wilcox K8WPE
·
#236
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
Not same but might be fun: ?SOUNDSCAPE BINAURAL JOE STREET VE3VXO project : http://www.learnmorsecode.com/soundscape/index.html
By
Rob <roomberg@...>
·
#235
·
|
Re: Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!
Ryan, Thanks for setting this up. Jerry / K0ES
By
Jerry / K0ES <jkbaum@...>
·
#234
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
I'm intrigued. On the Old Group, I had posted about building a homebrew phasing rig, I was reminded about the R2/T2 from KK7B. Those PDF's are at arrl.org too, and I've downloaded both of them so I
By
Ryan Flowers
·
#233
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
I have been thinking about a similar CW transceiver project using the phase shift design.? If you look at the schematic of the QCX at QRPLabs it uses a QSD with I and Q outputs which can run direct
By
Dan Pflugrath
·
#232
·
|
Re: "A Binaural IQ Receiver" QST Mar 1999 Campbell KK7B
That article as available on the web at http://www.arrl.org/files/file/History/History%20of%20QST%20Volume%201%20-%20Technology/QS03-99-Campbell.pdf Available to anyone. Mike K5ESS Sent: Monday,
By
K5ESS
·
#231
·
|
Re: Group Introduction: If you're going to post on the group, reply here!
New member. Listen quite a bit, talk very little. Frank KB4VU
By
Frank
·
#230
·
|