Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Selection of nanoNVA for HAM radio use??
Looking at the number of different versions available on Amazon, I'm confused. Although not an abnormal state for me, I try to keep it to a minimum.
Can the group make some recommendations for a nanoNVA version fo antenna tuning and other uses not known to a new user on a nanoNVA? thanks for any recommendtions, Bob |
I bought a NanoVNA-H v3.6 recently and I am happy with it. I use it mainly
for antenna tuning. Here is my little 'NanoVNA for Antenna Tuning: A Beginner's Guide': Other uses which I have tried are: Measuring the characteristic impedance of a coax. Measuring length of a coax (actually distance to first fault). Testing a unun for End Fed Half Wave Antenna. There are many more which I am yet to learn and try out and you will certainly learn from the posts on this group with many experts. I chose a previous version as it was cheaper and my friend told me that it is enough for my type of basic use. It was bought from another VU ham's online store. I was also confused like you for about two years and kept looking for a reliable source till my friend recommended one after he had used it. Please note that it is a very delicate piece of equipment to be used with extreme care. Some have lost it by inadvertently transmitting while NanoVNA is connected to another nearby antenna. 73 Jon, VU2JO On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 7:30?PM Bob Manning N7AW via groups.io <rfmanning= [email protected]> wrote: Looking at the number of different versions available on Amazon, I'm |
If you are going to be doing outdoor work, I strongly recommend the H4 with
it's 4" screen. It is extremely difficult to distinguish between a slash zero and an 8 in bright light. Also, the H4 shows the stimulus range for each saved band, which is a big help. On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 10:00?AM Bob Manning N7AW via groups.io <rfmanning= [email protected]> wrote: Looking at the number of different versions available on Amazon, I'm |
Most hams are happy with the -H4.
Dave - W?LEV On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 3:26?PM William French - AA1BF via groups.io <bill.french.epsom@...> wrote: If you are going to be doing outdoor work, I strongly recommend the H4 with-- *Dave - W?LEV* -- Dave - W?LEV |
I use a micro SD card to save calibration settings.
Jon VU2JO On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 8:56?PM William French - AA1BF via groups.io <bill.french.epsom@...> wrote: If you are going to be doing outdoor work, I strongly recommend the H4 with |
i would use a newer v2 (saa2n or v2plus4) .. or a litevna64
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
dg9bfc sigi Am 04.05.2025 um 17:23 schrieb ae1th@... via groups.io: if not going above 900 mhz , get the nano h4, get from randl electronics, it will NOT be a clone. |
On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 10:17 AM, Jon wrote:
It is also very easy to damage ANY instrument by connecting a charged cable to one of its inputs. A cable can pick up a charge from being flexed or from the internal friction of being unrolled; ungrounded antennas can be charged by wind currents. It is good practice to discharge all cables by momentarily shorting inner and outer conductors before mating them; often it is possible to do this using the outer conductor of the mating connector, coin, tweezers, etc. 73, Don N2VGU |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss