Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Plate RF Choke Measurements
#measurement
Re visit this topic as I am looking at plate chokes for a tube amplifier.
I used 1010 points from 100 kHz to 30 MHz. There are 3 chokes shown here. The older National R175 shown in a prior post with its problems of 2 in band resonant conditions, a 230 uH homebrew choke for 160 - to - 40 meter. Fine but horrible beyond 15 MHz and finally a fairly nice choke at 100 uH on a ceramic core complete with a 500 pF/20 kV bypass capacitor. This choke shows a single resonance but is out of band. It appears unnecessary to provide a short across the choke to pick up these loops if a shunt S11 measurement is used. In all cases the parallel resonate point crosses the open circuit side of the chart. A short across the choke simply rotates the reflection towards the short circuit side of the chart however the series loops stay in tact. Alan |
Dear Alan,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
thank you for sharing the measurements. I assume you used NanoVNA-saver. Can you please share the s1p or s2p files if saved? TNX, 73 Ady YO2NAA On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:14 AM alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote:
Re visit this topic as I am looking at plate chokes for a tube amplifier. |
Hi Ady.
I only did a screen capture. The measurement and cal are one port only. So I would have only S11 data available. The main thrust of the post is you need to capture a reasonable number of data points, 10 bands for 100 kHz to 30 MHz was used. You can probably get by with much less. Perhaps 401. The series loops appear with no added short applied. The choke is measured in place on the chassis. Take care with this placement if you are concerned about a problematic loop near an operating band! A one port measurement appears sufficient. I can capture a S data file. Might be of interest if you desire some other form of display or post processing. Although this is all very nice, I am not parting with my GDO! Alan |
Hi Alan,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
thank you for the info. I think it is a good thing to save the measurement files, they are taking very little space and can be re-analyzed in the future with various software tools. Also can be used as reference for future measurements of the same DUT, to see any modifications. Actually I wanted to look at other graphs, for example S11 R and X, more comfortable for me to see resonances. I totally agree the choke should be measured in place. For S11 measurement of course no shorting is needed, both ends are connected to CH0. For GDO like measurement, shorting is needed to close the circuit. It would be interesting to compare S11 measurements with GDO and also with NanoVNA in GDO mode (small coupling coil on CH0). 73 Ady On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:08 PM alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote:
Hi Ady. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss