开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Locked Owen Duffys blog closed


 

Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred


 

That's sad to hear. He had such a body of knowledge on the site.
I wonder why he would take it away from all his fans?
Mikek


 

owenduffy.net – Mostly electronics… ( )
web.archive.org ( )
( )

( )
This is the most recent copy of the blog as found on the Wayback Machine.

Jack.


On Jan 27, 2025, at 07:47, Fred_M via groups.io
<dl4zao@...> wrote:


? Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred





<Owen Duffy Article.pdf>


 

You can add my name to the long list of readers that will miss Owen Duffy's blog. There is a lot of misinformation on the Web when it comes to RF topics and many of his posts were a well written technical rebuttal to many of these myths and falsehoods. His treatise of a given topic was always backed up with facts, example calculations and graphics. His online calculators were very useful and unfortunately no longer available.

Owen reads this group's messages and he had a particular interest in how to get the most out of a NanoVNA. Many posts were about getting accurate results and methods to achieve this. His other contributions were his modifications and bug fixes to the NanoVNA app (which OneOfEleven donated to the community). He also corresponded with DiSlord and suggested improvements to the firmware which enhanced the NanoVNA feature set.

On a personal level we communicated several times via email and I enjoyed the technical exchange. I appreciated his expertise and the mentoring that he provided to me.

Publishing a blog that is technically accurate and has useful articles takes considerable time and effort. There is also the financial cost associated with keeping a domain name. I guess after many years he felt it was time to move on to other interests. Owen you will be missed.

Roger Need in Canada


 

I must agree...? I will miss his blog greatly...? So sad to see it go...

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 1/27/25 09:43, Roger Need via groups.io wrote:
You can add my name to the long list of readers that will miss Owen Duffy's blog. There is a lot of misinformation on the Web when it comes to RF topics and many of his posts were a well written technical rebuttal to many of these myths and falsehoods. His treatise of a given topic was always backed up with facts, example calculations and graphics. His online calculators were very useful and unfortunately no longer available.

Owen reads this group's messages and he had a particular interest in how to get the most out of a NanoVNA. Many posts were about getting accurate results and methods to achieve this. His other contributions were his modifications and bug fixes to the NanoVNA app (which OneOfEleven donated to the community). He also corresponded with DiSlord and suggested improvements to the firmware which enhanced the NanoVNA feature set.

On a personal level we communicated several times via email and I enjoyed the technical exchange. I appreciated his expertise and the mentoring that he provided to me.

Publishing a blog that is technically accurate and has useful articles takes considerable time and effort. There is also the financial cost associated with keeping a domain name. I guess after many years he felt it was time to move on to other interests. Owen you will be missed.

Roger Need in Canada




 

Folks:

Roger is spot on with respect to misinformation offered on the Web,
supported by Dave W0LEV's frequent plea to be wary of unsupported wisdom
offered on YouTube.

Two real-life examples come to mind, with quotes from published e-mails:

In the first example, an internet "expert" advises that a full wave
horizontal loop antenna solution will offer the user a 6dB gain over a
dipole., or a signal that is 4X as powerful off the wire as a dipole.
I hope the guy reading the advice didn't really think his KW was going to
sound like 4 KW.

In the second example, the internet "expert" has decided that the
relationship between wavelength and frequency is 1 Lambda = 1005/f.
Wherever this guy is, the speed of light must be different than what it is
in the rest of the world - 983.571056 feet per second. If the author
"forged it himself" he copied the wrong figure.

*Example 1:*








*"Well in that case, the very best antenna (performance-wise) would be a
full-wave horizontal loop for 5 MHz.Unfortunately it is not small and not
inconspicuous. But it will have the best performance for the distance and
directions youwish to cover.The loop must be approximately 200 ft. long,
with 4 equal-sides of 50 ft.The exact length must be adjusted for your
exact frequency.The formula for calculating the overall length in ft. is
1005/f (where fis frequency in MHZ).This will work fine at a height of 20
to 30 ft, but requires 4 elevated supports.Alternative: you can build a
horizontal delta-loop. Sides about 67 ft.Either one of these will give you
about 6dB gain over a dipole."*

*Example 2:*










*"Subject: [Aerial-Talk] Velocity Factor SolvedI have a short explanation
and a long explanation.The short explanation is, all that crap is just
mental masturbation; creating work for the sake of having something to
do.In practice we use a formula, regardless of which one, cut the antenna
longer than necessary, then shorten to get resonance where we want. Most
important is that we have a stake in the ground and then cut it longer.The
Long Answer.1 Lambda = 1005/f? Lambda = 502.5/fThe vf of coper wire is
about 0.98; 0.98 × 502.5 = 492.45 (differs slightly, depending on whether
it is solid or stranded wire).If we put insulation on the copper wire, the
vf is about 0.96 to 0.97, depending on the type of insulation.0.96 × 502.5
= 482.4 (but we still haven't considered end effect).End Effect shortens it
another (about) 3%; 0.97 × 482.5 = 467.93 ... or 468.*
*Never believe a statistic unless you forge it yourself"*

One might just chuckle and move on, but the author actually worked for a
company that made antennas!

Owen will be missed, as will Roger and others like him, when they decide
they've done enough.

Sincerely,

Ed Mccann
AG6CX



On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:43?AM Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack=
[email protected]> wrote:

You can add my name to the long list of readers that will miss Owen
Duffy's blog. There is a lot of misinformation on the Web when it comes to
RF topics and many of his posts were a well written technical rebuttal to
many of these myths and falsehoods. His treatise of a given topic was
always backed up with facts, example calculations and graphics. His
online calculators were very useful and unfortunately no longer available.

Owen reads this group's messages and he had a particular interest in how
to get the most out of a NanoVNA. Many posts were about getting accurate
results and methods to achieve this. His other contributions were his
modifications and bug fixes to the NanoVNA app (which OneOfEleven donated
to the community). He also corresponded with DiSlord and suggested
improvements to the firmware which enhanced the NanoVNA feature set.

On a personal level we communicated several times via email and I enjoyed
the technical exchange. I appreciated his expertise and the mentoring
that he provided to me.

Publishing a blog that is technically accurate and has useful articles
takes considerable time and effort. There is also the financial cost
associated with keeping a domain name. I guess after many years he felt it
was time to move on to other interests. Owen you will be missed.

Roger Need in Canada






 

Also sorry to hear the news, I was very much a fan of his articles and his
no stones unturned thoroughness in his research. I will miss his reference
library and will have to go download it for posterity.

Vy 73

Adam Moss G0ORY IO92JO England




On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 15:47, Fred_M via groups.io <dl4zao=
[email protected]> wrote:

Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred






 

Owen will be sorely missed.

I had a habit of saving his excellent blog posts by performing a "print to pdf" and saving them to an Owen Duffy folder. I am always referencing them.

Mike N2MS

On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 15:47, Fred_M via groups.io <dl4zao=
[email protected]> wrote:

Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred


 

Mike-

You and your stash may become a most useful resource if you can spare the time and energy.

Thank you in advance!

Ed McCann
AG6CX

On Jan 27, 2025, at 11:41?AM, Mike N2MS via groups.io <mstangelo@...> wrote:

?Owen will be sorely missed.

I had a habit of saving his excellent blog posts by performing a "print to pdf" and saving them to an Owen Duffy folder. I am always referencing them.

Mike N2MS

On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 15:47, Fred_M via groups.io <dl4zao=
[email protected]> wrote:

Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred




 

Is there any chance of someone else hosting the info on their site?

We lost a treasure load of info when The Radioboard was lost after the long time owner turned it over to someone and then they
got a severe case of Covid. They were so sick they didn't pay the website fee and it was all lost. Very sad.

Mikek


 

I don't have them all but it that information protected an any way? I did not see any notice.

Mike n2MS

On 01/27/2025 2:44 PM EST AG6CX via groups.io <edwmccann@...> wrote:


Mike-

You and your stash may become a most useful resource if you can spare the time and energy.

Thank you in advance!

Ed McCann
AG6CX

On Jan 27, 2025, at 11:41?AM, Mike N2MS via groups.io <mstangelo@...> wrote:

?Owen will be sorely missed.

I had a habit of saving his excellent blog posts by performing a "print to pdf" and saving them to an Owen Duffy folder. I am always referencing them.

Mike N2MS

On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 15:47, Fred_M via groups.io <dl4zao=
[email protected]> wrote:

Sad news:


(mostly electronics) is no longer available.

regards
Fred





 

I was not aware that Owen discontinued his website. I enjoyed his insights. A great loss. I hope he is OK.

You can find owenduffy.net, and its predecessor vk1od.net, on the Internet Archive,

--
Art Greenberg
WA2LLN
art@...

On 1/27/25 10:47, Fred_M via groups.io wrote:
Sad news:

(mostly electronics) is no longer available.
regards
Fred


 

Here is another YouTube story...

A friend asked me to help him diagnose an antenna problem he was having, high SWR at any power over around 200 watts, on some relatively new antenna he had installed on his tower.? I came out to his place to assist, started looking around and upon spotting a PL-259 with the shield left unsoldered, announced, "Eureka", found it, easy fix!? I pointed out he had forgotten to solder this connector.

He got a very sick look in his face, I asked him what was wrong, this is simple to fix...? He then told me he had not soldered ANY of his connectors on his tower, or in the shack, because he saw a YouTube video telling him all he had to do was to just screw the connector onto cable and shield, no soldering needed, as long as it was RG-8 or LMR-200...

This was on his brand new 70 foot tower install, consisting of several dipoles, several V/UHF antennas, a Discone, and a few other antenna...? All in all he replaced around 30 connectors in his installation.? Rotor loops, jumpers in his shack, etc...? Not a single connector had the shield soldered...

All because he trusted a YouTube video...? Cost him a bunch to have the tower people come back out, climb the tower again and replace all the cables he had pre-built for them to use on install day...

Granted he should have known this, but he did not, and he used YouTube as a teacher...? At this point, needless to say, he no longer trusts anything he sees on the net...

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)

ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 1/27/25 10:33, AG6CX via groups.io wrote:
Folks:

Roger is spot on with respect to misinformation offered on the Web,
supported by Dave W0LEV's frequent plea to be wary of unsupported wisdom
offered on YouTube.

Two real-life examples come to mind, with quotes from published e-mails:

In the first example, an internet "expert" advises that a full wave
horizontal loop antenna solution will offer the user a 6dB gain over a
dipole., or a signal that is 4X as powerful off the wire as a dipole.
I hope the guy reading the advice didn't really think his KW was going to
sound like 4 KW.

In the second example, the internet "expert" has decided that the
relationship between wavelength and frequency is 1 Lambda = 1005/f.
Wherever this guy is, the speed of light must be different than what it is
in the rest of the world - 983.571056 feet per second. If the author
"forged it himself" he copied the wrong figure.

*Example 1:*








*"Well in that case, the very best antenna (performance-wise) would be a
full-wave horizontal loop for 5 MHz.Unfortunately it is not small and not
inconspicuous. But it will have the best performance for the distance and
directions youwish to cover.The loop must be approximately 200 ft. long,
with 4 equal-sides of 50 ft.The exact length must be adjusted for your
exact frequency.The formula for calculating the overall length in ft. is
1005/f (where fis frequency in MHZ).This will work fine at a height of 20
to 30 ft, but requires 4 elevated supports.Alternative: you can build a
horizontal delta-loop. Sides about 67 ft.Either one of these will give you
about 6dB gain over a dipole."*

*Example 2:*










*"Subject: [Aerial-Talk] Velocity Factor SolvedI have a short explanation
and a long explanation.The short explanation is, all that crap is just
mental masturbation; creating work for the sake of having something to
do.In practice we use a formula, regardless of which one, cut the antenna
longer than necessary, then shorten to get resonance where we want. Most
important is that we have a stake in the ground and then cut it longer.The
Long Answer.1 Lambda = 1005/f? Lambda = 502.5/fThe vf of coper wire is
about 0.98; 0.98 × 502.5 = 492.45 (differs slightly, depending on whether
it is solid or stranded wire).If we put insulation on the copper wire, the
vf is about 0.96 to 0.97, depending on the type of insulation.0.96 × 502.5
= 482.4 (but we still haven't considered end effect).End Effect shortens it
another (about) 3%; 0.97 × 482.5 = 467.93 ... or 468.*
*Never believe a statistic unless you forge it yourself"*

One might just chuckle and move on, but the author actually worked for a
company that made antennas!

Owen will be missed, as will Roger and others like him, when they decide
they've done enough.

Sincerely,

Ed Mccann
AG6CX



On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:43?AM Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack=
[email protected]> wrote:

You can add my name to the long list of readers that will miss Owen
Duffy's blog. There is a lot of misinformation on the Web when it comes to
RF topics and many of his posts were a well written technical rebuttal to
many of these myths and falsehoods. His treatise of a given topic was
always backed up with facts, example calculations and graphics. His
online calculators were very useful and unfortunately no longer available.

Owen reads this group's messages and he had a particular interest in how
to get the most out of a NanoVNA. Many posts were about getting accurate
results and methods to achieve this. His other contributions were his
modifications and bug fixes to the NanoVNA app (which OneOfEleven donated
to the community). He also corresponded with DiSlord and suggested
improvements to the firmware which enhanced the NanoVNA feature set.

On a personal level we communicated several times via email and I enjoyed
the technical exchange. I appreciated his expertise and the mentoring
that he provided to me.

Publishing a blog that is technically accurate and has useful articles
takes considerable time and effort. There is also the financial cost
associated with keeping a domain name. I guess after many years he felt it
was time to move on to other interests. Owen you will be missed.

Roger Need in Canada







 

I am so sorry to hear this. I made a lot of use of Owen's online calculators and he reviewed a couple of projects I'd been working on (favourably). Sometimes Owen would pick up on posts I'd made to qrz.com and email me with his advice.

We can only hope that it's a temporary glitch?

--
Mike G8GYW


 

Indeed, hopefully temporary.? But meanwhile it seems that most posts are available via the web archive at archive.orgSent from my Galaxy

-------- Original message --------From: "Mike via groups.io" <mail@...> Date: 28/1/25 7:54?pm (GMT+10:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed I am so sorry to hear this. I made a lot of use of Owen's online calculators and he reviewed a couple of projects I'd been working on (favourably). Sometimes Owen would pick up on posts I'd made to qrz.com and email me with his advice.We can only hope that it's a temporary glitch?-- Mike G8GYW


 

If I were to get a suitable URL; would anyone be willing to reconstruct his site as a project?

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger Need via groups.io
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 12:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

You can add my name to the long list of readers that will miss Owen Duffy's blog. There is a lot of misinformation on the Web when it comes to RF topics and many of his posts were a well written technical rebuttal to many of these myths and falsehoods. His treatise of a given topic was always backed up with facts, example calculations and graphics. His online calculators were very useful and unfortunately no longer available.

Owen reads this group's messages and he had a particular interest in how to get the most out of a NanoVNA. Many posts were about getting accurate results and methods to achieve this. His other contributions were his modifications and bug fixes to the NanoVNA app (which OneOfEleven donated to the community). He also corresponded with DiSlord and suggested improvements to the firmware which enhanced the NanoVNA feature set.

On a personal level we communicated several times via email and I enjoyed the technical exchange. I appreciated his expertise and the mentoring that he provided to me.

Publishing a blog that is technically accurate and has useful articles takes considerable time and effort. There is also the financial cost associated with keeping a domain name. I guess after many years he felt it was time to move on to other interests. Owen you will be missed.

Roger Need in Canada


 

I am willing to get and support a site but I do not have the web HTML etc skills to resurrect his site. Who can and will?

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mikek
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

Is there any chance of someone else hosting the info on their site?

We lost a treasure load of info when The Radioboard was lost after the long time owner turned it over to someone and then they
got a severe case of Covid. They were so sick they didn't pay the website fee and it was all lost. Very sad.

Mikek


 

I now own and can host RFDUFFY.com
Who will step up and recreate the site from Duffy's orginal?

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mikek
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

Is there any chance of someone else hosting the info on their site?

We lost a treasure load of info when The Radioboard was lost after the long time owner turned it over to someone and then they
got a severe case of Covid. They were so sick they didn't pay the website fee and it was all lost. Very sad.

Mikek


 

Has Owen expressed any opinion on someone resurrecting his content?

He's the copyright owner. It' s his choice on whether or not this should be
brought back.
As a simple courtesy, before you decide to do anything, I'd reach out for
permission.
Better that than getting a legal demand to take the site down after a bunch
of work.
-Rick


On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:18?AM Lester Veenstra via groups.io <m0ycm=
[email protected]> wrote:

I am willing to get and support a site but I do not have the web HTML etc
skills to resurrect his site. Who can and will?

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed
USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mikek
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

Is there any chance of someone else hosting the info on their site?

We lost a treasure load of info when The Radioboard was lost after the
long time owner turned it over to someone and then they
got a severe case of Covid. They were so sick they didn't pay the website
fee and it was all lost. Very sad.

Mikek










--
Rick Murphy, D. Sc., CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA


 

If anyone is willing to do the work, please raise your hand. Obvious first step is to get his permission. In that context of a contact, if here wants to just get out of supporting the site, I am willing to add his site registration the one I already hold.

Again I have no skills in this area but will support anyone who does have skills and intent with site registration and hosting services.

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Murphy via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

Has Owen expressed any opinion on someone resurrecting his content?

He's the copyright owner. It' s his choice on whether or not this should be
brought back.
As a simple courtesy, before you decide to do anything, I'd reach out for
permission.
Better that than getting a legal demand to take the site down after a bunch
of work.
-Rick


On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:18?AM Lester Veenstra via groups.io <m0ycm=
[email protected]> wrote:

I am willing to get and support a site but I do not have the web HTML etc
skills to resurrect his site. Who can and will?

Lester B Veenstra K1YCM M?YCM W8YCM 6Y6Y W8YCM/6Y 6Y8LV (Reformed
USNSG CTM1)
lester@...

452 Stable Ln
Keyser WV 26726 USA

GPS: 39.336826 N 78.982287 W (Google)
GPS: 39.33682 N 78.9823741 W (GPSDO)


Telephones:
Home: +1-304-289-6057
US cell +1-304-790-9192
Jamaica cell: +1-876-456-8898


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mikek
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Owen Duffys blog closed

Is there any chance of someone else hosting the info on their site?

We lost a treasure load of info when The Radioboard was lost after the
long time owner turned it over to someone and then they
got a severe case of Covid. They were so sick they didn't pay the website
fee and it was all lost. Very sad.

Mikek










--
Rick Murphy, D. Sc., CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA