Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly
I have 2 VNAs . H4 and New F v2. Using the H4 to measure coax length I get a reading that's spot on. But when I use the F V2 the reading is like 60% or more / greater than it should be. H4 at marker reading at top right on the screen 16.01 meters for a 52 ft RG-8X coax. But the F v2 shows for the same coax 1034. m, I know the V2 is different in the menu layout than the H4 and I dont have a menu for the V2. There is something wrong that I'm doing or the F2 VNA is bad.
Cliff W4CBH |
Yes, if you mean the value. Both 82% for RG-8X. Even if the VF was off maybe 5 meters still shouldn't come up with over a 1000 m for the 16 m / 52' length.
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Foster via groups.io <m.foster99@...> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 8:01 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly Did you enter the Velocity Factor (VF) of the coax the same in both units ? |
Just out of curiosity...for the H4 the VF is entered as a decimal as 0.82. Is the F V2 VF entered the same or is it in percent?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Geoff -->AB6BT On 3/5/2025 6:18 PM, CLIFTON HEAD via groups.io wrote:
Yes, if you mean the value. Both 82% for RG-8X. Even if the VF was off maybe 5 meters still shouldn't come up with over a 1000 m for the 16 m / 52' length. |
Entered 82 no % (.82) just 82 and it comes up on the screen as 82%
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Geoff Peters - AB6BT via groups.io <AB6BT@...> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 8:43 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly Just out of curiosity...for the H4 the VF is entered as a decimal as 0.82. Is the F V2 VF entered the same or is it in percent? 73, Geoff -->AB6BT On 3/5/2025 6:18 PM, CLIFTON HEAD via groups.io wrote: Yes, if you mean the value. Both 82% for RG-8X. Even if the VF was off maybe 5 meters still shouldn't come up with over a 1000 m for the 16 m / 52' length. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss