¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

"Hand capacitance"


 

Hello team,

While I was measuring an handheld VU antenna, I noticed that the nanovna was suffering of "Hand capacitance" influence.

My unit is an original one, shielded. What can I do to improve it? Have you noticed the same? What about calibration, do you think your hand will influence it?

Cheers!

LL


 

Are you seeing the effects of your hand on the instrument or on the antenna? Remember also that those antennas are dependent on a counterpoise, usually the HT and your body, so you will see significant difference capacitively coupling your hand to the Nano. You even see thus difference on a full size VNA, so the test setup for those small antennas really matters.


Peter

On Aug 5, 2019, at 9:54 AM, spaceopqa@... wrote:

Hello team,

While I was measuring an handheld VU antenna, I noticed that the nanovna was suffering of "Hand capacitance" influence.

My unit is an original one, shielded. What can I do to improve it? Have you noticed the same? What about calibration, do you think your hand will influence it?

Cheers!

LL



 

Hello Peter,

On the device itself.

So I will elaborate a little more, as I would like to use one nanovna at the field, as a simple SWR measurement tool, and of course operate it handheld. Maybe it will not occur in a proper HF antenna?

Would you isolate the S21 port, or simply the "open" calibration tool will suffice?


 

It should be much better in the field on a proper HF antenna, both because of the counterpoise and also the lower frequencies involved.

Well at least your HF antenna should have a proper counterpoise, or your HF transmitter will be ¡°hot¡± when you transmit.


Peter

On Aug 5, 2019, at 10:15 AM, spaceopqa@... wrote:

Hello Peter,

On the device itself.

So I will elaborate a little more, as I would like to use one nanovna at the field, as a simple SWR measurement tool, and of course operate it handheld. Maybe it will not occur in a proper HF antenna?

Would you isolate the S21 port, or simply the "open" calibration tool will suffice?




 

I saw similar effects myself when testing the antenna from a handheld
transceiver. As Peter says it is to be expected as, in its intended use,
the human operator together with the conductive part of the rig form the
ground plane that is required by that type of simple vertical antenna.

No hand effects have been noticeable when I have tested HF, VHF & UHF
verticals (all with adequate radial systems) or with VHF/UHF yagis.

There seems to be no need to do anything with the s21 port but it would
probably be good practice to put a 50ohm load on it.

Regards

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, 15:15 , <spaceopqa@...> wrote:

Hello Peter,

On the device itself.

So I will elaborate a little more, as I would like to use one nanovna at
the field, as a simple SWR measurement tool, and of course operate it
handheld. Maybe it will not occur in a proper HF antenna?

Would you isolate the S21 port, or simply the "open" calibration tool will
suffice?





 

You can try a short coax loaded with low freq ferrites that fit tight on the coax. It helps (somewhat). Cal at the end of the coax

On 8/5/2019 12:13 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
I saw similar effects myself when testing the antenna from a handheld
transceiver. As Peter says it is to be expected as, in its intended use,
the human operator together with the conductive part of the rig form the
ground plane that is required by that type of simple vertical antenna.

No hand effects have been noticeable when I have tested HF, VHF & UHF
verticals (all with adequate radial systems) or with VHF/UHF yagis.

There seems to be no need to do anything with the s21 port but it would
probably be good practice to put a 50ohm load on it.

Regards

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, 15:15 , <spaceopqa@...> wrote:

Hello Peter,

On the device itself.

So I will elaborate a little more, as I would like to use one nanovna at
the field, as a simple SWR measurement tool, and of course operate it
handheld. Maybe it will not occur in a proper HF antenna?

Would you isolate the S21 port, or simply the "open" calibration tool will
suffice?





 

An antenna without a counterpoise (ground or ground-plane) is just a piece of wire. If you are testing a "rubber duckie" I would recommend mounting it onto a piece of metal; even a piece of aluminum foil would give a truer reading. A whip antenna mounted on a hand-held radio is a poor compromise, but at least the radio and your hand acts as a sort of ground.When I worked for Kenwood USA and Standard Communications we did some antenna testing of this sort.

Stuart K6YAZLos Angeles, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank S <ka2fwc@...>
To: nanovna-users <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Aug 5, 2019 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] "Hand capacitance"

You can try a short coax loaded with low freq ferrites that fit tight on
the coax. It helps (somewhat). Cal at the end of the coax

On 8/5/2019 12:13 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
I saw similar effects myself when testing the antenna from a handheld
transceiver. As Peter says it is to be expected as, in its intended use,
the human operator together with the conductive part of the rig form the
ground plane that is required by that type of simple vertical antenna.

No hand effects have been noticeable when I have tested HF, VHF & UHF
verticals (all with adequate radial systems) or with VHF/UHF yagis.

There seems to be no need to do anything with the s21 port but it would
probably be good practice to put a 50ohm load on it.

Regards

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, 15:15 , <spaceopqa@...> wrote:

Hello Peter,

On the device itself.

So I will elaborate a little more, as I would like to use one nanovna at
the field, as a simple SWR measurement tool, and of course operate it
handheld. Maybe it will not occur in a proper HF antenna?

Would you isolate the S21 port, or simply the "open" calibration tool will
suffice?