开云体育

Native Instruments LabVIEW Runtime is available for Mac so you should also be able to run Joe Smith's application if you download and install as necessary. You'll have to figure all that out on your

Hi Cliff, Please browse the forum's wiki and user messages for lots of good info on those using Mac's with their Nano On Tue., 11 Jan. 2022 at 11:20 p.m., Cliff<ae5zaham@...> wrote: Is there any

Thanks to all who responded. It looks like nanoVNA-Saver is the one to try. 73, Cliff, AE5ZA

Cliff, Mac user here. I am successfully running the latest version of nanoVNA-Saver on an M1 Mac running Monterey. I installed it using MacPorts. https://github.com/NanoVNA-Saver/nanovna-saver Terry

Hello! I think it could be useful to have an option to display a circle of a given radius (set as the desired SWR value) to quickly check if the Smith's graphic exceedes that limit. Yes, it is

Cliff: This was signed by Larry. /g/nanovna-users/message/5421 Gene KI7LCB

NanoVNASaver: https://github.com/NanoVNA-Saver/nanovna-saver/releases/ 73, Eugen, HB9MDU

Is there any software written that runs on a Mac and connects to the nanoVNA? All I seem to find is Windows only. 73, Cliff, AE5ZA

Thanks for the confirmation, Dragan. And yes, the answers were all for the NanoVNA rather than Saver. Chuck

It seems that everyone is missing the SAVER part. Anyway there is no such feature in the NanoVNA Saver.

I believe it will load Memory 0 on power on so save the calibration to # 0 and it should load it for you on power on. 73, Cliff, AE5ZA

Roger - I am trying to avoid doing a CAL on the nanoVNA screen as it is difficult for me to red it. So I want to do the cal via nanpVNA aver, but on startupm nanoVNA Saver always says there is no

An early version of 4.2, that's probably why you do not have the SD slot. You can solder one yourself ... AFAIK the N variety was only made with NanoVNA V2, a different platform. Only difference from

Looks good, not much of a change except that the new version is a few dB better from 200-280Mhz. [email protected]> wrote:

Thank you. Bought from R&L on 4/9/2020 and since updated to V 1.0.39; Kernel 4.0.0. STM32F303xC I'm interested in the N-connector variant and wonder are they really more robust? No complaints with

Not sure I did this right, but here is what I got. 73 Stan KM4HQE

It's a slot for an SD card. Where (and when) did you get your device from?

What is Card1 at top? I do not have that in my variant. HW

Did you notice any change in the performance (presuming that you have both versions)? [email protected]> wrote:

Thanks, as expected, small changes in the layout compared to 4.2.1 that I have. Can you post a s2p file when the device is in an uncalibrated state, port1 terminated port2 left open? Here is the image