¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: stand for the NanoVNA???
If you have access to a 3-D printer, there are a ton of designs for NanoVNA cases, holders, connection extensions, etc. Here is but one: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4100713 Many public libraries
By Dave Merrill · #29559 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Yes, I spaced the Rogers products. Thank you for mentioning the Rogers 4350 substrate. FR-4 is available everywhere and is relatively inexpensive. What's more and being critical, both the dielectric
By W0LEV · #29558 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Hi Dave Very very difficult to get Duroid processed these days.I don't know of any US shops that will touch that stuff any more.(Rumors of one in California with a Plasma etcher) If you want plated
By KENT BRITAIN · #29557 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
I was also going to suggest you actually measure the ¦År of the PCB you actually used at the frequency you intend to use it. The ¦År of FR-4 board falls between an upper an lower limit, but it is not
By W0LEV · #29556 ·
Re: stand for the NanoVNA???
You may have forgotten that you can put an extension cord of the length you want between the nanaoVNA box and the location where you are going to do the calibration. Even the imperfections of the
By F1AMM <18471@...> · #29555 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Hi Zack?The big inventory is Arlon 25N which is also space qualified!Currently have 6 antenna assemblies in orbit and working on 3 more!I do a lot of antennas were the Er of the PCB material is not
By KENT BRITAIN · #29554 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Kent Britain WA5VJB may chime in, but he found the variation in dielectric constant for various samples of G10/FR4 so large that he bought a large stock of board with the same dielectric constant and
By Zack Widup · #29553 ·
stand for the NanoVNA???
I recently purchased a NanoVNA (with a 2.8 inch screen). I was wondering if anyone has designed/printed a stand for the NanoVNA??? I'm looking for something that I can put the end of it into (so that
By n1evh · #29552 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
EZNEC as a Method of Moments code that is derived from NEC is really a "wire" modeling code and doesn't do patches very well. One can "grid" a patch, and put it over ground with soil properties set to
By Jim Lux · #29551 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Hi Brian, Thanks for your reply, attached is my code. I put the dielectric at 4.8 it's FR4. I started with 4.29, my PCB was made by PCBway company. I remark that when I increase permittivity the
By Diane BONKOUNGOU <dianebonk2@...> · #29550 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Yes, and I have known Roy for nearly 30 years, but EZNEC does not do PCB antennas.? ? ?When you download his Pro version, be sure to get the manual as well.? He has RETIRED!? ?Kent
By KENT BRITAIN · #29549 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
What Er did you use for the PCB Material?Unless it is very expensive material where the plot the Er by frequency, you really don't know the Er. It is industry standard to measure the Er at 1
By KENT BRITAIN · #29548 ·
Re: Wikipedia erases nanovna
Next try on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_analyzer_(electrical) - this time with focus on use in university education - ref is a paper of ASEE (American Society of Engineer Education).
By Ho-Ro · #29547 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
EZNEC is now free.
By Gary W9TD · #29546 ·
Re: Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Can you upload the file and I'll have a look The dielectric constant you chose might d
By Brian Howie GM4DIJ · #29545 ·
Antenna simulation result different from experiment with NanoVNA
Hello everyone, I used OpenEMS software for my simulation and I got simulation results that are very different from my experimental result, I have a PCB antenna whose resonant frequency is around
By Diane BONKOUNGOU <dianebonk2@...> · #29544 ·
Re: Anything for Windows 7?
I moved from Windows XP Pro 32 bit to Windows 10 64 bit, starting october last year. It was definitely not a painless transition. I installed W10 on a new computer, and had to run with both in
By Manfred Mornhinweg · #29543 ·
Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration
Hi Roger, Mine is marked HW version 4.3 MS on the back. I used NanoVNA-H4-MS_20220831.dfu from Hugen's github page. Thought that was the version that was on it when I got it since the description on
By TE Dukes · #29542 ·
Re: FS: NanoVNA-H4 #nanovna-h4
Please PM me. HOGALLEN aka Gary A. Smith 2150 East 575 North St. George Utah 84790 435 272-7077
By Gary Smith · #29541 ·
Re: FS: NanoVNA-H4 #nanovna-h4
HOGALLEN aka Gary A. Smith 2150 East 575 North St. George Utah 84790 435 272-7077
By Gary Smith · #29540 ·