NanoVNA saver cannot connect to NanoVNA vis com port error
Well NanoVNA Saver 0.6.5 used to connect to com port on Win 10 and now it does not. I start the nanovna software, turn on the NanoVNA and when
I click Rescan the software crashes off. If I turn on
By
Mick N3OJP
·
#39661
·
|
Re: NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly
Entered 82 no % (.82) just 82 and it comes up on the screen as 82%
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 8:43 PM
To: [email protected]
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39660
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
Thanks, I see C1 is the 1 because I saved the cal.
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 5:18 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39659
·
|
Re: how good is a rain gutter antenna
At the advice of many, I simply removed the 9:1 UNUN (Palomar Engineering) and made a "direct" connection to the rain gutter via a sheet metal screw.
Then ran one radial along the ground (I will try
By
Barry K3EUI
·
#39658
·
|
Re: SD card format?
#beginners1
Addendum: After posting the last message, I reviewed the video link which I
had posted regarding saving of stimulus frequency range. Then I saw that on
recall, I have to press on the number displayed
By
Jon
·
#39657
·
|
Re: SD card format?
#beginners1
I am using a 32GB micro SD card in my NanoVNA-H v3.6. I use it mainly to
save calibration (https://youtu.be/DgvjlHsU0h4). I did not do any
formatting, just inserted a new card and started saving
By
Jon
·
#39656
·
|
Re: SD card format?
#beginners1
I recently bought an H4 v4.3. Was looking forward to being able to save plots from the nanoVNA to a micro SD card. But every attempt resulted in "fail write" message. I read that it cannot handle
By
moshe.braner@...
·
#39655
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
Oops, sorry, already answered multiple times.
Must remember that when we Brits are tucked up in our beds,
you Yanks are still enjoying your evening's hobbies :-)
By
Gareth Evans
·
#39654
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
It's your calibration!
O - Open; S - Short; L - Load (The 50 Ohm)
By
Gareth Evans
·
#39653
·
|
Re: Sysjoint SV4401A nanoVNA
As a P.S. to my last comment (below), from a search i found a reference to
yet another version of nanoVNA Saver (0.7.3). On one PC, the SV4401A would
not connect (or would crash) just as in the other
By
Orrin Winton
·
#39652
·
|
Re: Sysjoint SV4401A nanoVNA
I appreciate any comments.
I go to nanovna.com, it suggests:
For platforms such as Amazon or AliExpress, please buy directly through the
store provided by the link. Other advertising links on the
By
Orrin Winton
·
#39651
·
|
Re: Sysjoint SV4401A nanoVNA
Completely different animal from the NanoVNA group
https://chelegance.github.io/WIKI/METER/SV4401A/SV4401A/
By
PT
·
#39650
·
|
Re: NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly
Just out of curiosity...for the H4 the VF is entered as a decimal as 0.82. Is the F V2 VF entered the same or is it in percent?
73,
Geoff -->AB6BT
By
Geoff Peters - AB6BT
·
#39649
·
|
Re: Sysjoint SV4401A nanoVNA
No, you may have gotten a clone. Try NanoVNA.com Good Luck.
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 8:17 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Orrin Winton
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39648
·
|
Re: NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly
Yes, if you mean the value. Both 82% for RG-8X. Even if the VF was off maybe 5 meters still shouldn't come up with over a 1000 m for the 16 m / 52' length.
________________________________
Sent:
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39647
·
|
Sysjoint SV4401A nanoVNA
So i bought one of these on Amazon (SV4401A). They're $150 less on Ali
Express, but i don't entirely trust Ali Express -- i've been burned twice
by them. The last "burn" was $24 worth of fake coax.
By
Orrin Winton
·
#39646
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
Thank you Stan
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 5:18 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Apologies if flogging a dead
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39645
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
Thank You
________________________________
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 4:08 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Apologies if flogging a dead horse!
By
CLIFTON HEAD
·
#39644
·
|
Re: NanoVNA F V2 not working correctly
Did you enter the Velocity Factor (VF) of the coax the same in both units ?
By
Mark Foster
·
#39643
·
|
Re: Apologies if flogging a dead horse! CAL Correction?
OSL - Open, Short and Load, the normal calibration of the system for a DUT
(Device Under Test)
[email protected]> wrote:
By
WyoHam
·
#39642
·
|