开云体育

I didn't know that, probably it is because the project is some years old. If anybody is interested I can send it via personal message. 73 de Ignacio EB4APL -- El software de antivirus Avast ha

Why do you say that? I personally would not buy MFJ, and a RigExpert purchased by my radio club had an out of specification N connector. But I fail to see why your comment is accurate. me neither RF

Of one knows the nanoVNA, one knows that it can simply trace SWR/Impedance, and nothing else. Just a line. For less than 50USD, its not possible to find a more accurate device, even for "antenna

I agree with Ed. I have an early NanoVNA, and a more expensive one by Seeed, the Sark 110, but to do antenna installs and tuning of my antenna matching device I use my YouKits FG-01 as it just gives

"It can be downloaded from here: /g/PHSNA/files/Windows%20PHSNA/PHSNA%20User%27s%20Guide%201r42.pdf" The group does not accept new logins, so the referenced file is not available. 73,

Oristo: Regarding: $15 Particle Xenon has bluetooth Be aware that is a discontinued part that Particle is no longer manufacturing.

The MFJ analyzers and the NanoVNA are two different animals. If what you want is measuring SWR, and nothing else, the analyzer is for you. If you ever worked with a VNA, and know the repertoire, you

Im very happy with a recently acquired H4 from Gigaparts and the smaller and older Hugen version. Carl

I want to add to the list please? You want the nanoVNA so you can read the "antenna system" into your computer. Save the results. Then open up a program called SimSmith and analyze your system and

Thanks. ---? Ciao baby, catch you on the flip side?? 73 de W3AB/GEO ??? http://www.w3ab.org You can say "over", you can say "out", you just can't say "over and out".

You might find the MFJ easier to use if all you want to do is check SWR, but if you want more details, you want the NanoVNA.? I own two of them, will probably buy an H4 soon, and will also buy the V2

SMITH CHARTS !!!! Bill

I concur with what Dave sez, plus the freq range is seamless & you can connect it to a droid and/or windblows PC. I do suggest using a pair of SMA connector savers. I have some that are push-on,

I calculated a minimum loss resistor network, reducing the 2 x 14.8 dB from the HP fixture to 2 x 11.4 dB. Please see at https://www.rudiswiki.de/wiki9/nanoVNA#Crystal_measurement Attached are 2

Why don't you pay half a beer to the OP of this topic?

You will see them. It's just a matter of time.

Thank you Dave.? I have gotten great answers and enough courage to decide.? Just clicked the purchase the NanoVna H4.? I am really looking forward to having it on this next antenna project. Thanks

The MFJ's 1) do not cover the frequency range of the NANO's 2) do not offer the measurement accuracy of the NANO's 3) do not have the frequency accuracy of the NANO's 4) do not have the diversified

Didn't see any for the H4 version. ?___ Sent from my two way wrist watch 73 de W3AB/GEO?

Bummer. Thanks. ?___ Sent from my two way wrist watch 73 de W3AB/GEO?