Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Recent NanoVNA-H4 arrival
Hugen said in his mesg that the case has not been changed yet.It's no big deal to cut a slot - only on one half of the housing - you can nibble away with small sidecutters and trim with an exacto knife.that's what i did.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Friday, September 4, 2020, 10:49:29 a.m. EDT, Russ@va3rr via groups.io <va3rr@...> wrote:
Has the case been modified to allow outside insertion of the micro SD (TF) card?? I added the card reader to my H4, but I'm debating modifying the existing case, or trying to order a new case from Hugen... va3rr |
Re: Recent NanoVNA-H4 arrival
Yes, we installed microSD for the latest nanoVNA-H4 after DiSlord completed the microSD migration.
Since we have not completed the modification of the shell mold and have not reserved an installation position for the 32.768kHz crystal, there is no new promotion for the time being. Later I will modify the shell mold and add a 32.768kHz crystal, and maybe make some new modifications to improve the performance when using harmonics. Thank you for your concern, I will listen to more suggestions. |
Re: Adjustable Port1 Output Level
#features
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 06:38 AM, Bob M. wrote:
.. Are there any NanoVNA products, of any version, that have an adjustable Port1 output level? ===================================================== Bob, The current version NanoVNA-F as well as the NanoVNA/NanoVNA-H4 with DiSlord's firmware have a 'Power' menu for adjusting the output power. I haven't looked at the actual dBm increment so I don't know if the range would meet your needs. If you did an SOLT calibration after an attenuator attached to Port1 wouldn't that correct for impedance measurements after the attenuator? To answer my own question I did a SOL calibration after a 6dB attenuator attached to Port1 and then measured a 75 and 100 ohm precision mismatch attached to the output of the attenuator. The measured values were 75 and 100 ohms as expected. - Herb |
Recent NanoVNA-H4 arrival
Igor Jobim posted on another group that a friend had recently received a NanoVNA-H4 from hugen's shop. He included a photo of the pcb board it it showed that the NanoVNA-H4 his friend received had a sdisk card already intstalled and a slightly higher 2000mA battery than previous version -H4's.
I haven't seen an official announcement by hugen, so I'm not sure if the -H4 with this board is only available by special request or not. - Herb |
Adjustable Port1 Output Level
#features
Are there any NanoVNA products, of any version, that have an adjustable Port1 output level? My V2 unit's output is -10dBm and while that's great for working with passive networks, it's a problem for measuring preamps that can't handle that much signal. Yes, I can add a pad at the input of the preamp, but that will affect the SWR and other measurements. A way of reducing the Port1 output level by 0, 10, or 20dB would be very helpful but there doesn't seem to be any way to adjust the stimulus level, only its frequency range.
Perhaps this capability can be added to a future version. |
I designed an enclosure.
#enclosure
#battery
Designing the cases required several nights of hard work and design choices has been done in order to :
- Accommodate a large enough battery and internal stylus fitting - Have no visible screws on the top and bottom of the case - Tight fit, stays compact, and easy to assemble - Leds for battery on the bottom level are visible Hopping you'll like it. |
Keysight "RF Microwave Signal Chain & Network Analysis" webcast
added to External links: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/13116 |
Re: SAA2N reviews
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:40 AM, Hugen wrote:
Yes, they use the same PCB manufacturing. From: Ash Date: 2020-09-04 15:35 Subject: Re: Re: [nanovna-users] SAA2N reviews Thanks Hugen. It is SMA, does the VNA have the same RF characteristics and performance verification as the N type version?. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ash, Please note that the N-type also has a 4" display versus the 2.8" display of the SMA version. With a N-to-SMA adapter and SMA SOL standards and cables you get the best of both versions when purchasing the N-type. - Herb |
Re: SAA2N reviews
Yes, they use the same PCB manufacturing.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
hugen@... From: Ash Date: 2020-09-04 15:35 To: hugen@... CC: nanovna-users Subject: Re: Re: [nanovna-users] SAA2N reviews Thanks Hugen. It is SMA, does the VNA have the same RF characteristics and performance verification as the N type version?. On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:12 AM hugen@... <hugen@...> wrote:
Yes, this is Maggie's shop. hugen@... From: Ash Date: 2020-09-04 14:56 To: nanovna-users; hugen Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] SAA2N reviews Hi Hugen, Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:54 AM Ash <ashraf.physics.ta@...> wrote: Hi Hugen, Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:28 AM Hugen <hugen@...> wrote: We are very sorry, there are many countries where we have not found a more suitable logistics solution. This has led to many countries temporarily unable to deliver or need to pay too high logistics costs. We are temporarily reluctant to use cheap logistics solutions that cannot be tracked, and we are worried that these logistics may not be delivered on time. Sorry for not being able to purchase again, we will look for more suitable partners. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 03:18 AM, Dragan Milivojevic wrote:
|
Re: SAA2N reviews
Thanks Hugen. It is SMA, does the VNA have the same RF characteristics and
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
performance verification as the N type version?. On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:12 AM hugen@... <hugen@...> wrote:
Yes, this is Maggie's shop. |
Re: SAA2N reviews
Yes, this is Maggie's shop.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
hugen@... From: Ash Date: 2020-09-04 14:56 To: nanovna-users; hugen Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] SAA2N reviews Hi Hugen, Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:54 AM Ash <ashraf.physics.ta@...> wrote:
Hi Hugen, Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:28 AM Hugen <hugen@...> wrote: We are very sorry, there are many countries where we have not found a more suitable logistics solution. This has led to many countries temporarily unable to deliver or need to pay too high logistics costs. We are temporarily reluctant to use cheap logistics solutions that cannot be tracked, and we are worried that these logistics may not be delivered on time. Sorry for not being able to purchase again, we will look for more suitable partners. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 03:18 AM, Dragan Milivojevic wrote:
|
Re: SAA2N reviews
Hi Hugen,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:54 AM Ash <ashraf.physics.ta@...> wrote:
Hi Hugen, |
Re: Dipole length
Here is the figure from Carter paper (1932).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Piero, I0KPT Il 03/09/2020 01:53, AG6CX ha scritto:
The chart of impedance varying with height above ground has been around since at least 1928 or so, first published by Carter in IEE Transactions. |
Re: SAA2N reviews
Hi Hugen,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Is this your product? On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:28 AM Hugen <hugen@...> wrote:
We are very sorry, there are many countries where we have not found a more |
Re: SAA2N reviews
We are very sorry, there are many countries where we have not found a more suitable logistics solution. This has led to many countries temporarily unable to deliver or need to pay too high logistics costs. We are temporarily reluctant to use cheap logistics solutions that cannot be tracked, and we are worried that these logistics may not be delivered on time.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Sorry for not being able to purchase again, we will look for more suitable partners. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 03:18 AM, Dragan Milivojevic wrote:
|
Re: Bluetooth HC5 and nanoVNA-H
Status and enable on the HC05 aren't needed. Only Vcc, Gnd, Rx , and Tx need to be connected. And Rx and Tx are probably labeled from the perspective of the module they are on so probably need to be cross connected Tx on HC05 to Tx on nano and vice versa.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:27 AM, k4mla wrote:
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss