开云体育

It really addresses a totally different need. The MFJ is a handy device - Having a meter needle/LCD display to see the "dip" at resonance is a pretty fast way to trim a dipole. (with all it's

I believe that the subject of the post is the issue although I don't see anything wrong with it either.

I wondered the same thing myself. The 404 may have been glitch at github or maybe a mistyping of the url but I didn't think it was terribly disrespectful to ask about it. But maybe we are missing

See, a little love shared there. They say it makes the world go round Frank ;)

I used to have an MFJ-259. Errors and misreadings were common, especially at the extremes of frequency ranges. Also, tolerance on readings were about 20% or worse - bad...... And MFJ misleads on

Roger's TLW also runs in Wine on Linux.

Transmission Line Details seems to run just fine under Wine in Linux.

[Note: I posted the following SAA-2N review on the V2 users group. The attached stock photo is only representative of the internals of the SAA-2N and the warped faceplate shown does not appear to be

OneOfEleven, Any objective reading would infer the "glee" over MFJ being "peed-off." They're not. And...sales do not seem to be hurt much as they can't keep up manufacturing production of their

Carson, Read any manual for a MFJ A-A..you'll see the section on calibration. MFJ sells calibration sets for their MFJ259/269 A-As. Frank K4FMH --- Frank M. Howell, PhD Professor Emeritus,

Perdad, The download link that I gave from the ARRL is missing a couple of files. I have put everything required in one zip file. I have verified that it now runs on Windows 7 and windows 8.1 (64

Why would I be disappointed ? I was only thinking the obvious. It's far better to share love, not hatefulness, xx

Am I missing something here?

I would have to say the NanoVNA is probably putting a hurt on MFJ's sales of analyzers. Chris N9XCR

OneOfEleven, I can say for certain that Martin Jue is not peed-off, as you put it, over the NanoVNA. He's been designing the next generation of the MFJ antenna analyzer line for the past two years.

Hi Carson Well, knowing what I know about the NanoVNA's, I'd rather trust one rather than an analogue meter like the MFJ's, not because the MFJ's don't work (because they do!) but because a VNA gets

OK, thank you all. Ignacio EB4APL -- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

In NanoVNA no matter Order of calibrating All calculation made after you press done button On press Open/Short/Load/Isoln/Thru made only measure anc remember calibration data. After press Done, this

Thanks for sharing this - I just joined this group today! I had heard several times how the NanoVNA wasn't that accurate, so I was surprised to see how it compared to the MFJ analyzer. Thanks for

Yes, this has been a good learning exercise. Remember that I made the test-setup to intentionally get some weird results to see if those could be handled by an antenna tuner and describe how. And yes,