开云体育

There are now several new features. One seems to be scale for the delay. I have check this, so this may be no problem at all.

I have some 32cm teflon coax with an open end. I see no TDR from NanoVNA but I see a proper TDR from NanoVna_saver 0.22. Frequency settings seem to matter with TDR too. My frequency range was 50k-500M

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:16 AM, Larry Rothman wrote: I would definitely look the "next" time, and thanks, Larry. > Please remember folks - This info is all in the NanoVNA WIKI - link is at the >

in your case try $ sudo python3.7 -m pip install . /Martin -- QrssPiG, a QRSS grabber for your Pi: https://gitlab.com/hb9fxx/qrsspig “The best surfer out there is the one having the most fun” --

I second Larry's advice. There is a lot of invaluable information in the Wiki and Files sections that can save our members a lot of time and effort. This group members always seem to be willing to

Using Linux Mint 19.3 amd64 here. Built 0.2.2alpha successfully on 15.12.19 using the instructions here... https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver Upgraded LM19.2 to LM19.3 on 19.12.19. Now all

Hi Rune, I still find some strange things in the marker handling? : 1) I did a 2 port calibration? from 10kHz to? 1400MHz (and pressed "apply") 2) I filled all 9 marker-bars with different

Please remember folks - This info is all in the NanoVNA WIKI - link is at the bottom of every email post... Please refer to the Wiki and Files areas as they have a pile of very good reference

Attached is the one I could convert to PDF. The other is standard jpg. Dave - W?LEV

My desk-top PC (laptop) has never had an external device connected to it. Therefore no peripheral drivers have been installed. Might not be a problem in general but it was with this old HP Win7 Pro.

excellent thanks Tom Sides KI7FTK skype: Thomas Sides 4243 e. st Charles ave Phx AZ 85042

6 dB insertion loss or more. Just what I've been waiting for... ;-)? said the old HF CW op. (wow, what bandwidth...? nice job) 73 Arie PA3A Op 14-1-2020 om 12:06 schreef Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby

Using an FT240-61 core I got good performance from 1.8 to 30MHz, with less than 0.5dB loss over most of the range up to 30MHz Optimised with 6 trifilar turns of 18AWG silver plated stranded wire

Rune, You shouldn't have to necessarily run the program on Linux. We Linux users can do that for you. As long as you don't use some function in Python that is a Windows Only function, there shouldn't

Hi I have with great success made a "portable" 1:9 UNUN and choke solution into a small plastic box like in the picture. I use it for OZ0RF with my RFzero and it was also used by KH8/OZ1RH too. The

I know engineers who spent many hours trying to find a material that would allow 160M through 6M on the same amplifier.? It is not easy!? As I remember, they settled on type 62. If you are using hf

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 12:03, Gert Gremmen <cetest@...> wrote: . It is > difficult to have more than 1:100 in frequency range for a non tuneable > balun, due to non-symmetries in windings and

Gyula, The PDF is a big help. After reading your previous message, I was scanning the book about NanoVNA via Kindle. Near the end of the book (?) I found a reference to the need for a printer driver;

I downloaded the kindle manual on my PC... but I find it very very annoying to read and consult the e-book...probably because I'm a dinosaur, more used to leafing through a book than reading a PC

Wow, Thanks a lot to all. I have now a bunch of docs (pdf or docx :-) ) to read and possibly understand to make the best choice for my antenna. Great Jean