开云体育

search for "web" here: /g/nanovna-users/wiki

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 09:42 AM, Roger Need wrote: There is a bug that in nanosaver. You have to multiply the delay by 10 and enter that into offest delay (under Calibration). So instead of 1690 you

I just opened https://cho45.stfuawsc.com/NanoVNA/ web app on my Windows 10 computer in Chrome browser, but when I click on Connect, it says "No compatible devices found." The NanoVNA splash screen

/g/nanovna-users/topic/nanovna_saver_and_windows_xp/69405140?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,40,69405140 -- *73, Lucio I0LYL Rome, Italy*

NanoVna_Saver shows only lenght, not delay.

There is a bug that in nanosaver. You have to multiply the delay by 10 and enter that into offest delay (under Calibration). So instead of 1690 you have to enter 16900 ps.

Hi everyone, I want to use my nanovna with Windows XP I launch the nanovna-saver program but it gives me an error what procedures can I do to make it go Roberto iw5bsf

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 08:37 AM, <nanovnauser@...> wrote: is there a nanovna app that works with ver 6.0.1? ========================================= Per previous group messages on the subject,

is there a nanovna app that works with ver 6.0.1?

I do hope you have SimSmith. Excuse me for a non-finished answer. It's after midnight in Germany. I do have SimSmith and your experience and mine coincide, Hans. Ideally, we want the maximum available

From: roncraig1@... [] It is possible to tweak the synthesizer frequency setting to account for any TCXO tolerance. I don't think this function is written into the firmware and if it is not it

PS. also not sure how accurate you can be with zero beating. There may be a demodulator low freq rolloff issue..

Hi Herb and Rune The S21 phase delay has been fixed OK and the S21 group delay are still correct, thank you indeed to Rune Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:

The nano's have a TCXO module which is not adjustable. The schematic shows a DAC freq trim control line from the uP but I believe all the nano's, beyond perhaps the first ones made, have a TCXO that

Thank you so much for the development of the NANO-Saver software. It has been a blessing in my antenna system work. I do have one request. I actually like the metric system but many of those that I

Rune, I'm using firmware 0.4.3Q and the new screen capture module has worked great with all screens I have thrown at it. Thanks for this addition and hope you enjoyed the holidays. - Herb

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:45 AM, Leif M wrote: I forgot the sign, + is surely not good. Is 1690ps good for a 32cm or one foot of coaxial? =================================================== For me

Interesting. I do not recall having to sudo the previous version. I'm not a programmer, but I'm wondering what changed? The instructions in README.md are the same. 73 -Jim NU0C "Andrew Harmon"

I rather like that "stupid switch". All three actions in one place. Handy. 73 -Jim NU0C "hwalker" <herbwalker2476@...> wrote:

I forgot the sign, + is surely not good. Is 1690ps good for a 32cm or one foot of coaxial?