Re: New extended Tutorial Version 1.5. for the NanoVNA-H
Hello Gunthard, Thank You very much for your wonderful web site with so many GREAT tutorials ! NE7LS wrote: -- n_n
By
Nels Nelsen
·
#8589
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
ann : next-to-come : on the comparison of our picture with that by Erik, PD0EK
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8588
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#90.04: Another one Estimated Value of Core Uncertainty in Z Measurement - Continuing our guesses regarding the references of Gary O'Neil, N3GO : 23 December 2019 -
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8587
·
|
Re: First PCB pictures of the V2
On the software side, Edy555 released his software under the GPL licence. Would that put the hardware under such licence? I am not sure. But Gabriel is telling us that the new product have nothing to
By
Pierre Martel <petem001@...>
·
#8586
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
@Gary, N3GO 22 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8572 Dear Gary, Well, these are interesting issues indeed, but we are not sure exactly where we have to look at, so we can only
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8585
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I tried to use the TDR on the Saver program, but it shows cable lenghts from 8 meters to 4 kilometers, depending on what I dunno. I have not yet found a procedure how to do TDR. w.
By
Helmut Wabnig
·
#8584
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Andy, Thanks for your comments! I'm not entirely sure what the NanoVNA returns via the serial port when changed to TDR mode - but since NanoVNA-Saver does have its own TDR function built in, I
By
Rune Broberg
·
#8583
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Presentation
#measurement
#nanovna-saver
#tutorials
Nico going Luc! Good pictures as well. I will be doing something like that tonight :-) in Dordrecht, NL. I will be focussing on the Smith Chart in the nanoVNA and applications of that, skipping as
By
Arie Kleingeld PA3A
·
#8582
·
|
NanoVNA Presentation
#measurement
#nanovna-saver
#tutorials
Hi All, Last friday, I gave a 4 hour presentation on the nanoVNA for the local radio club in Ostend, Belgium. It was attended by over 50 people, see a short report here
By
Luc ON7DQ
·
#8581
·
|
Re: Screen replacement?
Thanks for that good info. I ordered the 3.2" touch screen. Cost at present is 11 Euro. Thanks also to Herman, ON1BES, for upgrade documentation. I need no extension parts, as already I have a larger
By
DJ7BA
·
#8580
·
|
Re: First PCB pictures of the V2
If you can point out concrete examples with evidence of where we are "stealing intellectual property", you are welcome to bring the case to your local state department of commerce.
By
OwO
·
#8579
·
|
Re: First PCB pictures of the V2
S-A-A (V2) hardware is a completely new design from scratch. There is nothing that's bears any resemblance to the edy555 design, except for the use of si5351 to cover low frequencies. We have
By
OwO
·
#8578
·
|
Re: First PCB pictures of the V2
To my knowledge all of the developers are from China. Stealing intellectual property is very much a part of the culture. Dave -- Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd, drkirkby@...
By
Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd
·
#8577
·
|
Re: Screen replacement?
Terry, just try another card.
By
Ady, YO2NAA
·
#8576
·
|
Re: Choke Series resonant frequency measurement
I agree Alan, GDO or equivalent should be the best method IMO also. @Henry: If you use NanoVNA, it needs to be calibrated on a narrow freq interval, it has only 101 points, easy to miss a deep
By
Ady, YO2NAA
·
#8575
·
|
New extended Tutorial Version 1.5. for the NanoVNA-H
Hello Friends, I have my tutorial extended by a chapter "The NanoVNA-H used up to 1500 (1300) MHz" and uploaded to my Homepage ( www.gunthard-kraus.de) as Version 1.5. The chapter contains also a 110
By
Gunthard Kraus <mail@...>
·
#8574
·
|
Re: Calibration Algorithm
#calibration
Being mathematical identical the standards being NOT ideal have identical impact, even the uncertainty regions will be identical. The formula I provided for comparison and is proven to be identical is
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#8573
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
GIN&PEZ; Am I correct in my interpretation of this that incorporating standards with correction has - in this particular case - moved the measured result closer to the higher of the uncertainty
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#8572
·
|
Re: Calibration Algorithm
#calibration
Thanks Jeff; Too many new tools tied to learning about this. I don¡¯t know which one to learn first. :-) I¡¯m seeing universal agreement on the equivalence of the computations, so I¡¯m comfortable
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#8571
·
|
Re: Calibration Algorithm
#calibration
Erik; The most recent posts by GIN&PEZ is shedding some new light on this. I am seeing additional data that leads me to believe that my understanding still remains somewhat off track. I also see hints
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#8570
·
|