开云体育

No, it does not. It covers Fair Use quoting, which is the point. 73 -Jim NU0C "Dave Daniel" <kc0wjn@...> wrote:

One of our members posted a document in the "Filed" section showing his upgrade procedure to a 3.2" screen @

Many thanks to all for the valuable feedbacks Will come back once I managed. At the moment the app runs like a charm, but I prefer to publish it only once completed with the calibration part. 73 de

#89: On the Comparison of our Formulation with that by Erik, PD0EK - REFERENCES [1] 21 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8459 [2] 21 December 2019 -

just select the 2nd pic to get the touchscreen version.

try this,its biggfer but will work:https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32819384322.html?spm=a2g0s.9042311.0.0.7eb04c4deBphdN

I don't have the information you seek; however there is a larger version of the nano selling for around $150.? You might consider this as an opportunity to get a larger screen.? The original is

My VNA arrived with a busted screen, very bad packaging, unit works when connected to my computer. I received a full refund from Amazon despite what the vendor wanted which was a 40% refund.. I would

But that does not include wide re-publication . DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy

It is allowed as "Fair Use". https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/ "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and

Quoting is always at the discretion of the copyright holder.? Any part of a copyrighted work is protected. Bob

Define “common knowledge”. DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy

Isn't it OK to quote copyrighted articles as long as one credits the source? How about just quoting the parts that are not already common knowledge?

Ron, of course anyone is entitled to have a copyright for his writings.? That's part of what makes the free enterprise system as good as it is.? (And it isn't always so good.) Nobody should complain

Hopefully this will get fixed in Rune's next release. Are you around Rune??

@Erik, PD0EK - REFERENCES: [2] 21 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8473 [1] 10 December 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/8105 Dear Erik, If we understand

Hi Jeff You are right. The S21 phase show double phase shift but Group delay is correct Delay(ps)=(phaseshift[degree]/freq[MHz]/360)*1e6 Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:

Brings back (unpleasant) memories. A few years ago, I posted some information on eHam that Electric Radio Magazine had an excellent 3 part article (done by Ray, N0DMS, the Editor) concerning some

Hi Gary, Well, that proof in #8013 is certainly terse! I have a question: From the proof, I notice that sometimes G is set equal to +1 or to -1 (for open or short) and then this equality is used to

There might be a slight error in Rune's S21 compensation. Looking at his code, he defines the Thru's impairment as: gammaThrough = np.exp(np.complex(0, 1) * 2 * 2 * math.pi * self.throughLength * f *