¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
I mean to rip the BT module out of the device... Also, I just had a quick look at the pin mapping of the F072 as used in the NanoVNA.? PINS 30 & 31 (not currently used) can be remapped to USART1_TX &
By Larry Rothman · #6513 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Thank you very much for your provided spread sheet. At the moment I am still fighting with the decimal point/comma topic :-( 73, Rudi DL5FA
By Rudi · #6512 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
I do not find hacks turning ELM327 into BT bridge; cheap HC-05 has good Arduino support, https://components101.com/wireless/hc-05-bluetooth-module but wants substantial code. A "smart" BT LE shield is
By Oristo · #6511 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Yes, but SPI to USB host would be simpler than trying to add Bluetooth to nanoVNA firmware https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01EWW9R1E
By Oristo · #6510 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Actually, I was thinking a little more on what uses a serial to BT bridge: every one of those really cheap OBD2 BT car diagnostic readers has one built-in. Those readers cost $5 and up so the BT
By Larry Rothman · #6509 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Oristo, All Vaclav needs to do is use one of the unused serial ports on the chip and use a BT to serial module. I was looking at the F072 specs and it appears the serial pin I was thinking if using is
By Larry Rothman · #6508 ·
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
Hi Vaclav - Unless you find a Bluetooth dongle that supports USB OTG, I think that this is doomed. I found no 64-pin STM32 chip, as in nanoVNAs, that does USB OTG,
By Oristo · #6507 ·
Re: Now What
Herb, thanks very much. I assume the two devices are different enough that the manual for the smaller one will not be of help. I almost purchased the smaller one but thought why not get the larger
By Andrew Baer, M.D. <ambaer52@...> · #6506 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Attached spreadsheet contains the formula and you can paste your s2p file on the input tab -- Erik, PD0EK
By Erik Kaashoek · #6505 ·
NanoVNA software developers wanted #hacking
This is sort of "bump" / dupe. Or more direct approach. Take your pick. This is NOT post for / to users of NanoVNA, This post is about NanoVNA operating / embedded software hacking. I am planning to
By vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...> · #6504 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
A quick note, for those running from the Python source: "scipy" is required for the TDR impedance measurement display, and you therefore need to install this, for example by re-running the "pip
By Rune Broberg · #6503 ·
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Bryan, I am trying to calculate the T-Check value from the NanoVNA-Saver .S2P file with LibreOffice Calc, but I did not got the T-Check formular adopted. This is already done in the attached
By Rudi · #6502 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
Its in Octave (Matlab equivalent) for now till I know what algorithms to use I have a S11 model for the cable (includes estimating the frequency dependent loss and the Complex static impedance (did
By Erik Kaashoek · #6501 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
Hi Erik - Do you plan a GitHub repository? What approach for solving model parameters?
By Oristo · #6500 ·
Re: VNWA software #calibration
Hi Oristo Here is the Screen control for the FA-VA5 I have received from AE5CZ Larry Goga and have permission to distribute as I like Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:
By Kurt Poulsen · #6499 ·
Re: VNWA software #calibration
Hi Oristo The Yahoo VNWA group is in the process to move to a io group which is a better platform for a Wiki which I am sure will come. I have large number of document I will "flood" the Wiki with in
By Kurt Poulsen · #6498 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
And here is the nanoVNA data with the impedance correction for the long cable ( -0.075 -0.56i ohm) Substantial oscillations are still there and these do NOT come from the calibration kit or the cable
By Erik Kaashoek · #6497 ·
Re: VNWA software #calibration
Sadly, I lack the playful approach. Yes, I researched FA-VA5 before nanoVNA, but avoided the software until your prompting because of allergy to controls hidden in graphic user interfaces. That is why
By Oristo · #6496 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 05:48 AM, gin&pez@arg wrote: Dear gin&pez@arg How are you sure the errors to be corrected are larger than the uncertainty in your measurement. e.g. you are not trying to correct
By Erik Kaashoek · #6495 ·
Re: Chasing ghosts??? #internals #calibration
And here is a hint a first order cable correction (assuming the cable impedance is not exactly Z0) can improve the results The model corrects for the long cable impedance mismatch for the 3GHz VNA
By Erik Kaashoek · #6494 ·