¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.4
On 23/10/2019 20:21, John Nightingale via Groups.Io wrote: --------------snip------------------ >>>> A little note for new Linux users who find that Rune's application > is not seeing the NanoVNA when
By Barry Jackson · #6327 ·
Re: Success in automatic bridge and calibration error correction calculation #internals #calibration
Kurt wanted to see some pictures so here they are. The first picture is the dB logmag of S11 of a 30cm semi rigid cable (medium) and a 1 meter RG58 cable (long), both Open and Short at the end, both
By Erik Kaashoek · #6326 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
It looks like cheap Chinese SMA-terminators. If so, they have bad performance. Try to measure it with multimeter, does it have 50.0 ohm? Most of all it has high error, something like ¡À5 ohm.
By QRP RX · #6325 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
Mine failed also - a piece of junk. Bought my own online.
By Mike_nano · #6324 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
You can do scanraw for O,S,L cal-kit loads and use these results to calculate calibration corrections. After that just apply these corrections to a scanraw result.
By QRP RX · #6323 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
at RFPARTS to buy for 3,95$ Had recently gained bad experiece with cheap SMA-load baught via ebay (aro 1$ a piece), none of them had 50ohms, so I discarded them, contacted the ebay dealer for
By Arno DK3SS · #6322 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Its great that the scanraw command allows you to return more than 101 measurement
By hwalker · #6321 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
With thershold more than 300 MHz si5351 will use wrong frequency. Hardware works ok, so there is no PLL icon, but it uses wrong frequencies, so it won't works properly. Some invalid thereshold values
By QRP RX · #6320 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
But I think, most of all, this issue is related to some garbage in the settings (bad configuration settings). Another way to fix bad configuration settings is to cleanup all memory before firmware
By QRP RX · #6319 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
FWIW, by setting 'threshold 330000000', my nanoVNA gets crazy CH0 and CH1 logmag and Smith @ 983140600 Hz but no PLL icon, perhaps because power-on default scan does not go over 100MHz.
By Oristo · #6318 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
yes
By QRP RX · #6317 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Does that mean that if threshold frequency is set to 250 MHz then instead of 3 x 300 MHz = 900 MHz the
By hwalker · #6316 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
Yes, this is not possible to get more that 101 points with data command. Because firmware has fixed 101 points and you cannot change that. You can use NanoVNA-Q firmware, it has scanraw command which
By QRP RX · #6315 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
SMA connectors are fragile, and provided load spins in nanoVNA female socket. Some folks reduce CH0 SMA connector wear by adding male-female adapter. For frequent recalibration and BNC-equipped DUTs,
By Oristo · #6314 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
Also, you can try to setup START and STOP frequency in the STIMULUS menu, if PLL icon disappears after that, it means that your configuration has invalid frequencies and it's recommended to cleanup
By QRP RX · #6313 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
thanks for the info, I did not think I would be the only one Thanks Dave 2E0DMB
By davebb123456 · #6312 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
This PLL icon means that si5351 failed to setup some frequencies during sweep. There are two possible reasons: 1) bad configuration settings (it may store invalid frequencies for the sweep) 2) bad
By QRP RX · #6311 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
the load I got happens to have bad contact internally too, reacts when shaking or knocking at the table. Recommend use of better SMA-Loads for calibration. See RF-Parts or other dealer
By Arno DK3SS · #6310 ·
50ohm cal load failed
Hi My 50 ohm cal load failed that I got in the kit, has anyone had this happen to them ? Thanks Dave 2E0DMB
By davebb123456 · #6309 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
Hi , now I upgraded to 3.0.1 , but the problem is still present. I think is not possibile to have more than 101 points. And sweep cmd , not allow to set step size , but agin number of points. Now I
By Maurizio IZ1MDJ · #6308 ·