开云体育

Hello, yes, I have also performed an OSL calibration in the 150-190 MHz range. The SWR at 172 MHz is 4.5 I made the legs from copper wire with ~1mm diameter. The legs are mounted in a plastic tube.

Did you do an OSL calibration of the NanoVNA over the frequency range of interest? How is the antenna supported? How is it fed? I cannot imagine an antenna being that far off. Your length calculations

Hello everyone, I have bought a NANO VNA H4 to build simple dipole antennas. Now I have made a simple dipole antenna for testing. This should be tuned for 172 MHz. The total length is ~83 cm (2,72

Hi a Calibrated smith diagram can show you easily the serial resonance frequency and the parallele one ( Xr = 0 Omh ) , - use the 401 sweep points option to have maximum frequency accuracy . -

Well that makes it simple doesn't it. Make it slightly longer than expected, then partially cut through the cable or snip it completely off as needed for the short at freq! Cool! Joe

Joe, If you short the far end of the coax and connect the NanoVNA to the other end, each half wave will read a short on the VNA. half wavelengths repeat the impedance on the end, quarter wavelengths

I have a NanaVNA-H4, And how would I use it to make an exact 1/2 wave or multiple there-of coax? 1/2, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc... Joe WB9SBD

Have you tried reducing the sweep range? It might be informative to reduce the sweep to 25MHz starting at 300MHz, OSL calibrate at the measurement plane and run the sweep. Then move up 25MHz

You might be receiving strong signals with that antenna, that interfere with the nanoVNA's measurements. If that's the case, at least some of the excursions to negative resistance should not repeat on

** I think it would have been relevant, since you use nanaovna-saver, to post your .s1p files with your participation. -- F1AMM Fran?ois

Hello, v0.7.3 on Windows; Already had my nanovna calibrated in two range: 30 MHz around 315 and another 30 MHz around 434; used an average of 10 sweeps with ~saver which has produced some partly

Use Zeetk (SMC5351A + custom mixer, but this option also work on SM_ST device) or MS5351

In the latest software version: 1.2.43/NanoVNA-H-ZK_20250220.dfu there is an additional generator setting. Now we have three options in the MODE 1. MS5351 2. ZEETK 3. Si5351. What to choose with

Few people on the LibreVNA list did that, maybe ask there. IMHO it's not worth it. Sourcing some of the components is a problem and machining the enclosure is another one. [email protected]>

I wonder how much will cost to build LibreVNA / BOM + PCB price /.Thank you

Clyde, THANK YOU!!! I did not catch the difference earlier, used the H4 firmware and all is working well now! Thank you. Bill WB6YVK

If I read your post correctly, "nanoVNA-H4 hardware build 4.3 using the NanoVNA-H.v1.2.40.bin " Your problem is you used the WRONG firmware!!! You can not use "H" firmware on a "H4"!!!!! And expect

Just did a quick search re nanovna-saver and mint and found a set of instructions for you to follow here: https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=410869 ________________________________ Sent:

Yes Sudo was what I meant to type but either I fat fingered it on my phone or it was auto corrected to Suso. So sorry about that. ________________________________ Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 8:09:50

I am locking this topic as it has gone far afield of discussion related to NanoVNAs.