¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It would be well deserved. Could try it in space but wave to watch out for those pesky Quantum Fluctuations. Hi. --
By Hoffy · #38404 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
David: About time! K2TNO [email protected]> wrote:
By William Schrader · #38403 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Folks, this thread went off topic and continues to be off topic. While the off topic is very interesting it doesn't really have anything to do with the nanovna, so please do't post any more about
By Dave Daniel · #38402 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It's more than 20 years since I reviewed the analysis predicting gravity waves, but it involves the warping of space-time itself.? Not sure that the dielectric constant is included.? It can be found
By Andrew Lopatin · #38401 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Great reading that saga. Thanks 73 Bill K2TNO [email protected]> wrote:
By William Schrader · #38400 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It would be a very very interesting experiment to measurethe velocity of Gravity Waves though materials with differentdielectric constants.???? I predict a Nobel Prize at least!
By KENT BRITAIN · #38399 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Hi, just a question. As I understand it, light waves and radio waves react with matter which might slow down their passing through the matter whereas gravitational waves can pass through matter almost
By Hoffy · #38398 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Since we¡¯re having do much off-topic fun, I offer the following for you history buffs: So, Hertz begins his work on the first experiments 13 Nov 1886. He finishes up his first experiment to meet the
By AG6CX · #38397 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:00 PM, W0LEV wrote: "off-topic digressions" Yeah, maybe. But fascinating stuff & worth every minute of it. IMO -- Ron na2o
By Ron na2o · #38396 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
And not to mention the "velocity" of neutrinos. Not quite c but darn close. Do they contain mass which would limit their velocity to something < c. If not, why don't they travel at c? Yes, deep space
By W0LEV · #38395 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance; Heaviside
I'll just copy/paste from a DM from one of members on this forum. No attribution, not sure if they'd like me to "name names", but content is worth sharing :) "...the Telegrapher's equation comes from
By Miro, N9LR · #38394 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance; Heaviside
Most people are not aware of the debt we owe to Oliver Heaviside (who died in poverty, by the way) and assume that the equations we know as Maxwell's were expressed in their current form by Maxwell.
By Jeff Anderson · #38393 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance; Heaviside
Hi All, Yes, Oliver Heaviside is another of our little known doyens of the electronics world. He was indeed a remarkable man. Most of us would only know his name, let alone of his existence, if we are
By Bob Ecclestone VK2ZRE · #38392 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Who was it said that there is only one electron in the universe, but it moves so fast that its everywhere. Peter
By Peter Russell · #38391 ·
Re: SV4401A review
Sorry..typos I wanted to add ad more options anyway. What's the best bang for your buck? Maximum accurate dynamic range under 400mhz is the target too. Lite VNA 64, SV4401A, NanoVNA V2 Plus4 or
By N4FOX <N4fox.r@...> · #38390 ·
Re: SV4401A review
So the SV4401A of the Lite VNA 64? Which device is more reliable?
By N4FOX <N4fox.r@...> · #38389 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Most don¡¯t know this and its been heavily downplayed but the implications are specific. We watched two stellar masses merge. The gravity detection array vibrated from the merger several seconds
By KENT BRITAIN · #38388 ·
Re: SWR vs. Resonance; Heaviside
on, was a brilliant insight. It was, however, indigestible but for a few. Maxwell's four equations are, really, Oliver Heaviside's four equations.
By John Nightingale · #38387 ·
Re: NanoVNA <---> TinySA ultra
Thanks Stan for that explanation. Very interesting... To you and Dave, I have had the same 30dB external attenuation between the SA and VNA in all these pictures. What varies is that I've told the SA
By Matthew Rapaport · #38386 ·
Re: parasitic capacitance tests
Thanks Roger. -- Carlos Delfino Equipe Basic?o da Eletr?nica <https://basicaodaeletronica.com.br> Celular: (85) 985-205-490 (OI) - Aquiraz/CE <https://basicaodaeletronica.com.br> Em ter., 15 de out.
By Carlos Delfino · #38385 ·