开云体育

Rune, Thanks for the new release. Keep up the great work. I see the same issue with S11 return loss in dB. I do not see it in the phase plots. -- Bryan, WA5VAH

Hi Norbert, thanks for the bug report! I can tell you that the data points are drawn where they should be, but the reference lines are 10 pixels offset. Whoops! I've fixed it on GitHub, and the fix

Hi Bill, The .exe file should work just fine on Windows 10. First startup can take a little while, maybe 10-20 seconds, but after that it should run fine. What happens when you try to start it? --

These are nice little instruments !!Thanks for the update.

Larry Not very much actually. It was calibrated at the 100 MHz span and then I reduced the span to 50 MHz without recalibration in order to get better resolution. At these levels I am not concerned

Hi Rune, Thanks for your development efforts! I have a quick question about saving calibration data; can you read from / save to memory locations on the NanoVNA? 73, Brian WB8AM

Is there a trick to get the 0.1. version .exe to work.? I am on a win 10. machine. Is thisa linux .exe?? the other two version unload and install and work well w10 no.I tried to unload the zip file

Hi Kurt, Thank you, I look forward to your report. With regards, Bob

Hi Rune, thanks for the software update and for the additional features! One issue I recognized: S21 is with the previous version after calibration right on the 0 dB line and on the current version

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing! Roy WA0YMH

Warren,According to the calibration indicators along the left side of the display, you're outside of the originally calibrated boundaries (Small c).What differs after a full calibration around your

Here I am working on a circularly polarized 440 MHz antenna for satellite ops. The first screenshot shows initial results when it was first connected. The second trace is after tuning. To be able to

Rune, Thanks for the tip on using Hugen's firmware. I finally found the latest version of his firmware which has TDR capability and works with both nanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12 and 0.1.0. The version of

Hello Paul, before starting, click on the program properties and put a tick in the box "Allow". -- Hans-Peter Prast, DL2KHP

Manufacturers may be aware that V2 is coming, at which point V1 will be a hard sell.

Hi Eric - This may help: 1) Paste into Android Chrome browser: chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-features 2) change to [ Enabled ] FWIW, that enabled Web-Client on my Chromebook browser

I use SMA adapters on my VNWA and nanaVNA analyzers since the SMA connector is fragile. Whether male to female or female to female adapters I recommend Amphenol adapters which are a higher quality

Thanks, Larry and cho45; Wiki pointers are updated: /g/nanovna-users/wiki

I did post the results of the open earlier. Kurt is going to do more, but my executive summary is that the cal kit supplied to me is quite reasonable. Far from perfect, but quite reasonable. The fact

That sounds odd. I definitely tested saving of calibration data. Did it write anything to the console about the save failing? Did you check that it didn't save as "bnc_4.cal"? -- Rune / 5Q5R