开云体育

Daily Digest is what keeps me sane (?!) W5VZB

C'mon folks - there is a NanoVNA-F group already on groups.io Why re-invent the wheel? I'm on it and the moderators should start telling people to use that forum for ALL -F related content.

[email protected]> wrote: David, I believe that the traffic on here is getting too much. I mentioned this a few days ago. I believe others have made the same point. The subject of subgroups had

Also different OS (Operating System), so very incompatible firmware

Wiki updated with pointer to firmware as well as TAPR VNA software /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. *File:* VNAR4.4.zip *Uploaded By:* *Description:*

My understanding is that the RF components are the same in the "Vanilla" and the -F version, and that they should both go to 1500 MHz with similarly mixed results. The -F, as I understand it, has a

David, The meaning is the upper limit is 100 MHz higher than the 900 MHz of the NanoVNA-F. Herb

I am unsure if you made a typo or an error, but on the link to alliexpress, it shows a marker at over 400 MHz. Did you mean 1000 MHz rather than 100 MHz? Dave -- Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave

Email direct, please, for the alpha testing :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R

Rune, do you want feedback here or via email?

Fair questions. My use will be 99% lab use. This means that form factor is not important. A display is nice but not critical, and if the display is less than 7" it is more or less useless to me. I

David, It would interesting if you gave a review of the NanoVNA and NanoVNA-F since you own both devices. Especially interested in whether Rune's nanovna-saver app works out of the box with the

You need to be connected to the Internet in order to use the Web interface because you need to access cho45's webpage.That means mobile data or WiFi. All I did was to connect my nano to the tablet's

Normally, you really don't need to upgrade if the device is working well for you. Typically, one would upgrade for two main reasons: 1. New functionality 2. Bug fixes The latest edy555 release fixed 3

Do it the ISO 8000 way = spaces

I am presently running the 300_ch (9-11-19) version of the firmware because I use the NanoVNA primarily for HF. I see that the latest version is edy555_bugfix (10-1-19). Would it be a good idea to

I would like to try the software. Rick LU4FDV

Hi Nigel, looks like the driver was the culprit! If nothing is shown in the box where it probably says "COM17" by now, it means the software hasn't detected the NanoVNA. I guess that could be clearer

Hi Nigel - It's good when a plan works. I have little Windows 7 experience. (I found Vista so awful that I pretty much stuck with XP SP2 until 8.1) Firmware updates almost certainly require STM's