开云体育

Yes, please.? Do not contemplate a second -F group! Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and a light, broadcastin' the resistance, through the rain and through the night..."

Yes, what Herb said! Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and a light, broadcastin' the resistance, through the rain and through the night..."

Rune, I greatly appreciate the information you have provided above. This is very helpful in the debugging process. I think your approach is very reasonable. I will do some more testing and get back to

I plugged nanoVNA into a MacBook via USB 2.0 hub and launched https://cho45.stfuawsc.com/NanoVNA/ from Chrome, after enabling its webUSB via the first Wiki link. I suspect that nanoVNA behaves better

David, It would interesting if you gave a review of the NanoVNA and NanoVNA-F since you own both devices. Especially interested in whether Rune's nanovna-saver app works out of the box with the

Daily Digest is what keeps me sane (?!) W5VZB

C'mon folks - there is a NanoVNA-F group already on groups.io Why re-invent the wheel? I'm on it and the moderators should start telling people to use that forum for ALL -F related content.

[email protected]> wrote: David, I believe that the traffic on here is getting too much. I mentioned this a few days ago. I believe others have made the same point. The subject of subgroups had

Also different OS (Operating System), so very incompatible firmware

Wiki updated with pointer to firmware as well as TAPR VNA software /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. *File:* VNAR4.4.zip *Uploaded By:* *Description:*

My understanding is that the RF components are the same in the "Vanilla" and the -F version, and that they should both go to 1500 MHz with similarly mixed results. The -F, as I understand it, has a

David, The meaning is the upper limit is 100 MHz higher than the 900 MHz of the NanoVNA-F. Herb

I am unsure if you made a typo or an error, but on the link to alliexpress, it shows a marker at over 400 MHz. Did you mean 1000 MHz rather than 100 MHz? Dave -- Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave

Email direct, please, for the alpha testing :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R

Rune, do you want feedback here or via email?

Fair questions. My use will be 99% lab use. This means that form factor is not important. A display is nice but not critical, and if the display is less than 7" it is more or less useless to me. I

David, It would interesting if you gave a review of the NanoVNA and NanoVNA-F since you own both devices. Especially interested in whether Rune's nanovna-saver app works out of the box with the

You need to be connected to the Internet in order to use the Web interface because you need to access cho45's webpage.That means mobile data or WiFi. All I did was to connect my nano to the tablet's

Normally, you really don't need to upgrade if the device is working well for you. Typically, one would upgrade for two main reasons: 1. New functionality 2. Bug fixes The latest edy555 release fixed 3