Combining graphs
#nanovna-saver
I would like to see both S11 (SWR) and |S11| (Impedance) in same graph . Can that be done ? PS Because of recent experience in this forum I feel I need to state this - please force yourself to simply
By
Anne Ranch <anneranch2442@...>
·
#32921
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Anne...It sees as though you have not read the cause and the solution to your predicament. There have been several people who clearly describe how do do what you need to do...
By
Geoff Peters - AB6BT
·
#32920
·
|
Re: measuring transformers - Re: [nanovna-users] Zo of twisted pair
Jim, If you work solely in the realm of s-parameters (e.g. characterizing your load in terms of S11, etc.), you might not need to create a SPICE model, depending upon what your goal is. Mini-circuits
By
Jeff Anderson
·
#32919
·
|
2 frequency adapter
Hello I appeal to your wisdom. It's on the sidelines of nanoVNA but some participants in this forum seem to me to know a lot of things, which is not the case everywhere With a circuit as attached
By
Fran?ois
·
#32917
·
|
measuring transformers - Re: [nanovna-users] Zo of twisted pair
Gosh, just interpreting measurement results from a transformer with professional measurements from the mfr is non trivial Consider a minicircuits 1:4 or 1:9 or 1:1 transformer. The S-parameters are
By
Jim Lux
·
#32916
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
OUT!? I hope so. This isn't the first time that I have thought that Anne is just another "Karen", looking for something to whine about. Doug -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
By
Doug <jdkearney@...>
·
#32915
·
|
Re: Zo of twisted pair
QUOTE: Many OM have big illusions about the capabilities that transformers and other balun unun etc. can have. generally more or less wound on a ferromagnetic core. Making measurements on these
By
W0LEV
·
#32914
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
I'm not sure Anne is really looking for an answer. Based on her responses, it sounds like she just wants to whine about something. Anybody that doesn't support her position is obviously wrong, and
By
Richard Montel
·
#32913
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
You cannot update from the program, just check if there's a newer version available, but VERSION_URL has changed recently from
By
Ho-Ro
·
#32912
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Is that connecting to github from within NanoVNA-Saver? Or some other way to connect to github? My manky old (aug 2020) copy has this in the about.py (below) and doesn't have any way to update from
By
Jim Lux
·
#32911
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
The fact that practically everyone else was able to figure it out should give you a pause.
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#32910
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
See my bug report at github: https://github.com/NanoVNA-Saver/nanovna-saver/issues/638
By
Ho-Ro
·
#32909
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Currently there's a big code restructuring going on for the upcoming version 0.6 that switches from Qt5 to Qt6. If you're using the latest stable release 0.5.5 then the check for updates from the
By
Ho-Ro
·
#32908
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Hello Sigi, we have not talked for a while. Hope all is well with you . I am currently using QT as a development tool , but have another project I need to finish first before I check another C/C++
By
Anne Ranch <anneranch2442@...>
·
#32906
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
¡° The less obvious question is - what kind of software is ANY published / public software when it cannot "connect" to run update?¡± An opensource software no more maintained by the original
By
Flam Boom
·
#32905
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Unbelievable.
By
Clint Sharp <cjaysharp@...>
·
#32904
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
Last release was in March https://github.com/NanoVNA-Saver/nanovna-saver/releases Last commit on github was 3 weeks ago
By
Ho-Ro
·
#32902
·
|
Re: Simple SWR analysis
#nanosaver
I have NEVER had a problem with Nano VNA SAVER on my Win10 desktop or laptop. It connects to a COM port. It allows me to choose a CAL file which I made earlier (one CAL file for each ham band). I pick
By
Barry K3EUI
·
#32901
·
|
Re: Zo of twisted pair
Many OM have big illusions about the capabilities that transformers and other balun unun etc. can have. generally more or less wound on a ferromagnetic core. Making measurements on these devices is
By
Fran?ois
·
#32900
·
|
Re: What Google Bard Thinks of the NanoVNA
I'd say Google's AI needs to spend more time bleeding information from this group. At present it's pretty sketchy and useless. Dave - W0LEV -- Dave - W?LEV
By
W0LEV
·
#32899
·
|