Re: H4 behavior
Hello, Use config-save after enable it Clyde KC7BJE
By
Clyde Lambert
·
#31939
·
|
Re: Frequency-domain reflectometry with the nanoVNA?
This is pretty standard FMCW - the frequency of the beat note from the mixer is proportional to the delay. substantially more information can be extracted from this beat frequency as compared to TDR
By
Jim Lux
·
#31938
·
|
Re: H4 behavior
Oh, now I understand. Your H4 does indeed save the scale and applies it properly. What it doesn't save and restore is the grid labels (i.e. from the "show grid values" checkbox). Apparently the "show
By
Stan Dye
·
#31937
·
|
H4 behavior
Stan, here is what happens when I create the swr profile, take a reading, power down then power back up. I have also included a shot of my version. 73, Bob, KN4HH
By
Bob Watson
·
#31936
·
|
Re: Frequency-domain reflectometry with the nanoVNA?
I should add that I am mainly interested in FMCW FDR (electrically, essentially the same thing as chirp sonar/radar). A typical implementation of this scheme involves a ramp generator and VCO driving
By
Will Phillips
·
#31935
·
|
Re: Unable to save scale setting after creating swr measurement profile
Bob, I also use an H4, and can readily save a power-up "profile" with whichever swr scale I choose. I currently set the swr trace scale to 0.25 (shows on the display as 250m), and then select the
By
Stan Dye
·
#31934
·
|
Unable to save scale setting after creating swr measurement profile
I have a NanoVNA-H4. I followed the H4 video for creating a swr measurement profile (my term). After completion of the steps, I successfully did a swr sweep of a uhf antenna. I shut down the unit and
By
Bob Watson
·
#31933
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
Attached is a photo of one I made for doing S21 measurements. It is made using one of the sections of the NanoVNA RF Test Boards that you can find on eBay, Amazon and AliExpress. Works OK for testing
By
Roger Need
·
#31932
·
|
Re: Frequency-domain reflectometry with the nanoVNA?
How is FDR different than FFT of S11 to generate time domain? The FFT approach does tell you about all the little lumps and bumps (as does classic TDR).
By
Jim Lux
·
#31931
·
|
Frequency-domain reflectometry with the nanoVNA?
Frequency-domain reflectometry (FDR) has a number of advantages over time-domain reflectometry (TDR), including enabling the detection of many more types of damage to coax than just open/short
By
Will Phillips
·
#31930
·
|
Re: TinySA - Up to 5GHz (Wi-Fi) & $140
By
Geoff Peters - AB6BT
·
#31929
·
|
TinySA - Up to 5GHz (Wi-Fi) & $140
I read on @Twitter last night there was a new TinySA with a range just past 5GHz, covering some Wi-Fi, and a 4 inch display for $140.
By
WB4LVA
·
#31928
·
|
Re: Gain = f(S12)
With great difficulty I finally found what could be s21_series_impedance s21_shunt_through_impedance Can you explain to me what is the point of going through that, since in any case the basic data is
By
Fran?ois
·
#31927
·
|
Re: Whooops...installed TinySA firmware on NanoVNA
#firmware
Yup - I've used both the DFU utility and an STLink2 dongle to flash my Nano with firmware without any issues. I also pushed the TinySA F/W to the Nano to play with the GUI as the TinySA design re-used
By
Larry Rothman
·
#31926
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
OK, OK... Would that be "Mega Mills" or "Milli Mills"???
By
Geoff Peters - AB6BT
·
#31925
·
|
Re: Cannot get nanovna-saver to work
#nanovna-app
Hi Roger, I have just quickly tried 5.5 but I got exactly the same results. The following messages were displayed in another window. These were the same for 5.4 NanoVNASaver 0.5.4 Copyright (C) 2019,
By
John Knight
·
#31924
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
Don't you mean a mill - a tenth of a cent? Mike N2MS
By
Mike N2MS
·
#31923
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
milli...mega...who's counting... New lottery "Milli Millions"! Think of what you could do with millis!
By
Geoff Peters - AB6BT
·
#31922
·
|
Re: Through calibration
#calibration
We have no allocation in the milliHertz region (mHz)! That's the land of earthquakes and the like. If you meant amateur radio HF allocation, that would be in the MegaHertz region (MHz). Dave - W?LEV
By
W0LEV
·
#31921
·
|
Re: Gain = f(S12)
Transformers are tricky. The voltage ratio between input and output is roughly the turns ratio, but that's not actually gain/loss, since the power through the transformer is what's constant. A 2:1
By
Jim Lux
·
#31920
·
|