开云体育

Muggs,Very nice design indeed! Easy access to switches, cables, connectors, etc. And looks very stable, too. Here is what I have found for a stand (3 photos attached). For those of you that peruse

Yep. I have a V2Plus 4 and do a single 401 point calibration over 80-10m, save it, and use that for all subsequent HF measurements, include much higher resolution sweeps over much smaller ranges, e.g.

I'm not sure if this is related to your application issue, but when I do sweeps of my impedance transformers and antennas I noticed that the markers change from what I manually set to whatever is the

Care to post your print model? Mike W9MDB

Hello All, I designed a stand for the H4 model of the NanoVNA see image. I couldn't find any info on mentioning things for sale in the groups.io, so if the group (or the mods) find this to be out of

Thank you, Bryan. I knew there had to be a option somewhere to delete or reset. Bob, KN4HH

H version not have FPU and hardware DSP, and can lost samples in processing (very critical for phase) also have less flash size This software - proof of concept for new device from Eric, and this

And, in fact, to be comparable to the Comet (or MFJ or whatever), you don't have to recalibrate every time. Just calibrate once, store it in location zero, and you're done. The electronics in the

The Comet unit is not a VNA, Vector Network Analyzer, so any comparison is inappropriate. However, if all you want to do is scalar match antennas and the like, the Comet unit does not require a

"Better" is in regards to the user's needs/mission. The Comet is a single-port instrument which does scalar (no phase information) reflection-only measurements. If all that the user is interested in

On 12/21/22 10:27 PM, Erik Kaashoek wrote: > For those that want to do very accurate phase and frequency measurements, but are not willing or capable to buy a PhaseStation or Timepod, a new FW has

No.

On my H4 I can reset saved profiles back to empty. Theres an advanced menu, then more, then reset option. I might be misquoting the menu names but its in there. This puts the vna back to factory

I have both. I consider the NanoVNA H4 to be the more sophisticated and versatile but delicate test instrument and the Comet CAA-500 Mark II to be the more rugged, comparatively. If I am analyzing an

Thanks, Erik. That rules out all the devices I have, then, unless the plain F might work! Note

Hi David, The design of the V2, Lite and Libre devices makes it impossible to use their HW in this way. And the MCU of the original nanoVNA-H is not fast enough so I gave up on that one. Has been

On 22/12/2022 06:27, Erik Kaashoek wrote: > For those that want to do very accurate phase and frequency measurements, but are not willing or capable to buy a PhaseStation or Timepod, a new FW has been

Does the expensive Comet CAA-500... do anything more or better than a nanoVNA? I don't believe the Comet has software apps or PC connectivity I couldn't find any comparison on the web or info by Comet

For those that want to do very accurate phase and frequency measurements, but are not willing or capable to buy a PhaseStation or Timepod, a new FW has been made available for the nanoVNA-H4 HW that

> > > > > *Nano VNA graphs of a? 150 ft long wire antenna fed against ground with a > wide-range tuner in shack* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Anyone up for a 160 meter digi mode QSO around 1850 kHz?*