开云体育

Doesn't Saver display it by default? Look at the button in lower left for "Display Settings..." Then, in the dialog, you can set the plot formats.. >

I can see the SMith Chart on my H4. Is there a way to see it on my PC (W11 64bit)

Hello Martin, Thank you very much for the detailed description. My print out of the SMITH menu is: SMITH LIN LOG REIM RX RLC GB GLC RpXp RpLC <- BACK I think this discussion is of still on topic. I

Well Rudi, the FW is organised as a tree in ui.c. The top menu is called "menu_top". This construction above searches all lines of ui.c (that I had read into the python variable ui and that I iterate

Hello Martin, Thank you very much for your quick help. With the source code from github it works now without flaw :-) It is amazing what you can do with Python, if you know how to use it :-) I like

Hi Rudi, I have no clue what goes wrong o your side, I copy/pasted the code here from the group and it works fine. (I suspected that the forum SW did some strange formatting) As a quick check add

S parameter - just complex number, no unit Range from -1 to 1 (real and imaginary part) Show how change reflect/thru signal in amplitude / phase from reference S11 = reflect / reference Re Im format

Rudy Severns often has some useful input on this sort of thing: https://rudys.typepad.com/files/some-notes-on-measuring-tower-resonances.pdf

Don't know of any reason why it wouldn't work. However ... I'm guessing the wire vertical is NOT grounded at the base of it, but the tower is? That may have some effect on it. Maybe if you could test

This thread had me thinking and wondering if anyone has successfully determined the resonant frequency of a tower using a Nano? At a friend's recommendation I constructed a 1' x 2' loop and this

Even imaginary numbers have units. This seems to be 0.644 of in_phase A/D full scale + 0.0532 of quadrature A/D full scale. SherpaDoug, WA1UWP

Many thanks! I now understand it just means "(644/1000) + (53.2/1000)", just as in milliNumber nothing more than that thus the "644m + 53.2m" notation is totally appropriate, IMHO. -- Thanks Again!

Hello Ho-Ro, Thank you very much for this great improvement of your nanoVNA menu-map program :-) I am working with MacOS Mojave, and tried it now with Python 3.9. The files ui.c and plot.c are from

Now available on GitHub: https://github.com/Ho-Ro/NanoVNA-D/raw/NanoVNA-H-noSD/parse_menu.py

m - milli u - micro M - mega G - giga And so on Re Im value - just complex number 644m + 53.2mj = 0.644 + 0.0532j

Additional: Re Im - base measured value All other values calculated from it

Greetings, Not that I have any real need to know but I am just curious what the "m" abbreviation stands for in the raw data example of "644m + 53.2m"? Does it happen to represent milliVolts RMS,

Base Smitch diagram value: Re Im https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_chart#/media/File:Smith_chart_explanation.svg Also Re Im more universal for S11 and S21 some (so i use it as default) R+jX

The chart setting defaults to the value it was set to at the last Save (for a given slot), so you can set it the way you like.

Then the menu parser doesn't make sense at all. It is a development tool living in my local source code git repository that is a fork from DiSlord's GitHub. But nevertheless, I made some code