¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNASaver 0.0.8
Thanks Rune, That makes life much easier. David -- David G Hopkins (VK4ZF) --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
By David Hopkins · #2682 ·
Re: NanoVNA Saver 0.0.9 screen size and saving screen questions
My $300 laptop has 1920 x 1080. Great for video etc but awful for running normal software on, what a crazy situation. The result is everything looks so tiny on the menus on 90% of the programs in
By David J Taylor · #2681 ·
Re: I cannot connect to my NANOVNA serial port?
I have the same issue. But use another USB cable is sometimes better. If i push OK in the serialPort window, the port is recognized after a few attempts. But yes,it is not ideal.
By ON1BES · #2680 ·
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
The IP5303 chip turns on when the load is connected. Connect a 20-100 ohm resistor to terminal 8 and the GND, if switching on does not occur, replace IP5303.
By DMR <bryonikater@...> · #2679 ·
Re: Electrical Delay_Port Extension
Hi hwalker One comment to you BNC calibration test. Are you cal kit home made with three bulhead adaptors where 2x100 ohm SMD fitted to the centerpin as load and the open as well the load has the
By Kurt Poulsen · #2678 ·
NanoVNA LNA S21 & S11
Hi. I just bought the NanoVNA and want to make some tests on some LNAs.I have 2 SMA 20db Attenuators.How to setup the VNA & how S11 is important in the Tuning.Very thanks for answers.Regards Sid.
By Said · #2677 ·
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
Edit: A warning. I was inspired to use another USB-C cable. Very strange is that with the supplied USB (black) cable the NanoVNA won't start connected to the PC. I did a test with a self-purchased
By ON1BES · #2676 ·
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
With all that new firmware, I now work a lot with the NanoVNA connected to the PC. With my modification in message # 967 I can start the NanoVNA with the placed switch on the IP5303. But once
By ON1BES · #2675 ·
Re: Filter measurement
Hi Andy, Hi, Andy, but your call also seemed familiar to me ;o) Yes, it's true, on 17.07.2017, in the morning at 04:30 I had a direct hit in my LF antenna. The antenna was disconnected but
By df2jp_1 · #2674 ·
Re: Firmware summary
Hi Hugen, this sounds very good! Are you looking at expanding the frequency/measurement range by a change of components as well? I'm happy to hear that you will stay consistent with the NanoVNA, but
By Rune Broberg · #2673 ·
Re: Firmware summary
Using the cho45¡¯s web interface can use nanoVNA very good on the phone , I think this is a very good expansion screen scheme. I'm also trying a 3.5-inch LCD, maybe working with the STM32F303 to
By Hugen · #2672 ·
Re: Firmware summary
This is the latest version of the edy555 that includes the TDR feature. I have modified the touchscreen calibration value before compiling and can be used directly with the 2.8-inch NanoVNA.
By Hugen · #2671 ·
Re: Firmware summary
Done
By Erik Kaashoek · #2670 ·
Re: Firmware summary
Maybe it would fit better in the Firmware section? ;-) Good work! -- Rune / 5Q5R
By Rune Broberg · #2669 ·
Re: Firmware summary
I pulled edy555 release 0.1.1 and merged with my scan command extension /g/nanovna-users/files/NanoVNA%20PC%20Software Contains an experimental TDR functionality and 1500MHz as
By Erik Kaashoek · #2668 ·
Re: NanoVNA firmware extended to 1500MHz with added scan command
Yes, I did send him a pull request to have the my scan command in his code as his scan command does not work
By Erik Kaashoek · #2667 ·
Re: vnaJ software ?
Hi Andy, what errors are you seeing? -- Rune / 5Q5R [email protected]> wrote:
By Rune Broberg · #2666 ·
Re: vnaJ software ?
OK thanks for the feedback. I just wanted to know before I took the time to start testing, and possibly avoiding a learning curve. That would have been nice, because I can get vnaJ working fine on a
By Andy G0FTD <punkbiscuit@...> · #2665 ·
Re: vnaJ software ?
No, it cannot. I spoke to Dietmar about him making changes or facilitating others by opening the source, and he was not in favour of either case. -------- quote ----------- Yes, I¡¯m aware of a bunch
By Gerry Kavanagh · #2664 ·
Re: nanoVNA Real Resistance Measurement Range
According to S1P file that you shared above, your BNC has VSWR=1.008 at low frequency (below 100 MHz) up to VSWR=1.0953 on 800-900 MHz.
By QRP RX · #2663 ·