开云体育

If you ignore the phase any signal presented at port 2 should be mixed with the CLK2 and create some response. As a test I applied a 10MHz -50dBm signal. This resulted in the first measurement.. You

hi i can't upgrade my nanovna on win10 x64 see picture the message is: THIS FILE DOESN'T HAVE CORRECT FORMAT ??????? ty https://pasteboard.co/IwBRO6Q.png

You need to use the V 1.03,it's ok for me on W10 x64 the V1.01 no work on win10

Ooops, too early in the morning here. My eyes followed the time to the right of the defs and I saw 200 to the left and 'mS' kinda stuck..... Where's my coffee!!!

At least in the source code version I have, it is defined as 200 system ticks - which, going by the comments in the code, should be about 20ms. That shouldn't create a problem in and of itself. --

Rob, I just had a look at the code - debounce is defined as 200mS which I think is the culprit. I think if someone could build the F/W with a debounce of 100mS (or 75mS?), that would solve the

60 ps is about one cm so it seems some calibration problem

[email protected]> wrote: HP/Agilent have made a few instruments over the years that combine the functionality of several instruments into the one box. Your comment got me thinking about the

From: Merlin Fox Amazon's demand algorithm at play I guess! Even worse on ebay :( ======================= I decided to go for two of the bigger boxes (MAX002S) as I have more kit which can then be

Amazon's demand algorithm at play I guess! Even worse on ebay :(

Hi Tom I get my nanoVNA to day. In the coming week I will measure the empty cap against my HP85033C calibration kit a let you know. Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:

Hi Salil, I'm missing the measurement units in your diagram.

Hi Salil, Tested your new script and it is working, I just modified a few things for my own preference. And I use 'ax1.set_xlabel' instead of 'plt.xlabel' to have xlabel displayed. neb

Hi Erik, Wow - great analysis! Your conclusion pinpointed the OPEN test deviation precisely! When I did the initial calibration I had not yet decided to document the testing. Then after

Unfortunately, I've since trashed all the related "stuff" and will not trust my memory ... However, I thought Hugen had set up a contact to deal with us english only speaking folks ... regretfully,

Hi Larry, et. al., You were right.? It happens in ui.c (static int Btn_check(void)) starting on line 121.? So it looks to me like you have the problem figured out.? The jog switch was something

Thanks Larry, for responding!? It felt the same to me.? I'll have to dig into the source code and see what is happening.? I kind of wanted to know if others were experiencing the same thing

That does make perfect sense. Thank you for the clarification. Don

Paul, have a look at post 957 for more info on this issue.

thank you for that info, my old eyes aren't up to the task, so I'll live with it I guess