¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Bad Cable
And why not? Cut the ends off and you have a nice 4-wire interconnect cable for projects. 73 -Jim NU0C "Ken Sejkora" <kjsejkora@...> wrote:
By Jim Shorney · #21077 ·
Re: Surgical Tubing for SMA connectors
How about the little yellow caps? They should be easy to spot but one of mine has gone feral.
By Bear Albrecht · #21076 ·
Re: Bad Cable
Guilty, as charged ? -- Ken, WB?OCV Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Bad Cable Ah, but there is the frugal parsimonious ham that
By Ken Sejkora · #21075 ·
Re: Bad Cable
Ah, but there is the frugal parsimonious ham that will see it and take it home. We, oops I mean they can't help themselves...... Joe
By Joe · #21074 ·
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
That was the "yep" bit as in your assumption was correct.
By Dragan Milivojevic · #21073 ·
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
V2.4 (V2 plus4) is still two port one path, but overall architecture is redesigned and port 2 return loss is much improved (typically >20dB) so you can get good results reversing the DUT and using two
By OwO · #21072 ·
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
Thanks for your reply and interested to see the 6G version coming. However, I think my current concern is about the 4G, iirc, v2.4, does it have one directional ports or support full two ports, i.e.
By David Geng · #21071 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
It was a bad data cable. It was the cable that came with the NanoVNA-H4. I have used it numerous times in the past to upgrade the
By Zack Widup · #21070 ·
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
Yep. The full 2 port 6GHz version is in the works, you can get a glimpse of it from the attached files here: /g/nanovna-users/message/19372 Based on this project:
By Dragan Milivojevic · #21069 ·
Re: Surgical Tubing for SMA connectors
Great idea ! is it FDA approved ?
By N8AUM · #21068 ·
Re: Bad Cable
We¡¯d just toss them ¨C Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:58 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Bad Cable In the lab, whenever I find a
By Gene - K1AVE · #21067 ·
Re: Bad Cable
In the lab, whenever I find a defective cable I cut off the end so that someone doesn't pull what looks like a perfectly good cable out and try to use it.
By Donald S Brant Jr · #21066 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H ---bad cable
Over the last year I have purchased some useful USB-rechargeable devices (flashlights, bike lights, battery packs, etc...), and all have come with USB cables for charging. I have re-learned recently
By af4ze@... · #21065 ·
Does V2.4 have full two port
as I though by default, it would still be one direction two ports as v2.2, but I might miss something, could anyone please clarify? BTW, is v2.4 more like an over clocked version of 2.2? regards
By David Geng · #21064 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H ---bad cable
Seems the EU group that recently made a new coax assembly for the Space Station or the Astronauts themselves could use a nanoVNA. They replaced the coax between the Kenwood TM-D710 and antenna causing
By Tom KD8AVF <kd8avf@...> · #21063 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
Was it a charge only cable or actually a BAD data cable?
By NC4BR · #21062 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
I thought heat, like from a hair dryer, was the way to loosen tape like that. I know they use it for phones.
By NC4BR · #21061 ·
Re: Data Corrupt Error
Hi Max, We already know that the base unit does not have a -H (2.8 "screen) but a 4" screen NanoVNA-H4 with firmware 1.0.39. Now all you have to do is find out from the person asking the message what
By Gyula Molnar · #21060 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
I had one of these cables recently and I put it in the bin because of that same scenario you had. Regards, James.
By James Anderson · #21059 ·
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
Hi Zack, that was going to be my very next suggestion if none of the suggestions I made worked. Great result. Kind regards, James.
By James Anderson · #21058 ·