Re: Bad Cable
And why not? Cut the ends off and you have a nice 4-wire interconnect cable for projects.
73
-Jim
NU0C
"Ken Sejkora" <kjsejkora@...> wrote:
By
Jim Shorney
·
#21077
·
|
Re: Surgical Tubing for SMA connectors
How about the little yellow caps? They should be easy to spot but one of mine has gone feral.
By
Bear Albrecht
·
#21076
·
|
Re: Bad Cable
Guilty, as charged ? -- Ken, WB?OCV
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Bad Cable
Ah, but there is the frugal parsimonious ham that
By
Ken Sejkora
·
#21075
·
|
Re: Bad Cable
Ah, but there is the frugal parsimonious ham that will see it and take it home. We, oops I mean they can't help themselves......
Joe
By
Joe
·
#21074
·
|
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
That was the "yep" bit as in your assumption was correct.
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#21073
·
|
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
V2.4 (V2 plus4) is still two port one path, but overall architecture is redesigned and port 2 return loss is much improved (typically >20dB) so you can get good results reversing the DUT and using two
By
OwO
·
#21072
·
|
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
Thanks for your reply and interested to see the 6G version coming. However, I think my current concern is about the 4G, iirc, v2.4, does it have one directional ports or support full two ports, i.e.
By
David Geng
·
#21071
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
It was a bad data cable. It was the cable that came with the NanoVNA-H4. I
have used it numerous times in the past to upgrade the
By
Zack Widup
·
#21070
·
|
Re: Does V2.4 have full two port
Yep.
The full 2 port 6GHz version is in the works, you can get a glimpse
of it from the attached files here:
/g/nanovna-users/message/19372
Based on this project:
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#21069
·
|
Re: Surgical Tubing for SMA connectors
Great idea ! is it FDA approved ?
By
N8AUM
·
#21068
·
|
Re: Bad Cable
We¡¯d just toss them ¨C
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Bad Cable
In the lab, whenever I find a
By
Gene - K1AVE
·
#21067
·
|
Re: Bad Cable
In the lab, whenever I find a defective cable I cut off the end so that someone doesn't pull what looks like a perfectly good cable out and try to use it.
By
Donald S Brant Jr
·
#21066
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H ---bad cable
Over the last year I have purchased some useful USB-rechargeable devices (flashlights, bike lights, battery packs, etc...), and all have come with USB cables for charging. I have re-learned recently
By
af4ze@...
·
#21065
·
|
Does V2.4 have full two port
as I though by default, it would still be one direction two ports as v2.2, but I might miss something, could anyone please clarify? BTW, is v2.4 more like an over clocked version of 2.2? regards
By
David Geng
·
#21064
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H ---bad cable
Seems the EU group that recently made a new coax assembly for the Space Station or the Astronauts themselves could use a nanoVNA. They replaced the coax between the Kenwood TM-D710 and antenna causing
By
Tom KD8AVF <kd8avf@...>
·
#21063
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
Was it a charge only cable or actually a BAD data cable?
By
NC4BR
·
#21062
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
I thought heat, like from a hair dryer, was the way to loosen tape like that. I know they use it for phones.
By
NC4BR
·
#21061
·
|
Re: Data Corrupt Error
Hi Max,
We already know that the base unit does not have a -H (2.8 "screen) but a 4" screen NanoVNA-H4 with firmware 1.0.39.
Now all you have to do is find out from the person asking the message what
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#21060
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
I had one of these cables recently and I put it in the bin because of that same scenario you had.
Regards, James.
By
James Anderson
·
#21059
·
|
Re: Bricked NanoVNA-H
Hi Zack, that was going to be my very next suggestion if none of the suggestions I made worked.
Great result.
Kind regards, James.
By
James Anderson
·
#21058
·
|