开云体育

You might like to look at the test board kit from SDR-kits. https://www.sdr-kits.net/DG8SAQ-VNWA-Testboard-kit There’s a lot more parts in it, and I suspect that you would learn much mote. That demo

Just a note on my experiences with buying the nanoVNA. I bought my first nanoVNA on amazon.com on August 11 as a KKMoon product with the seller shown as WSS-store. After ordering it I noticed that I

[email protected]> wrote: Don, I am not 100% sure I am interpreting your question correctly, so I will not give a very short answer. If you make a case with female N connectors protruding out,

I just received my NanoVNA and downloaded NanoVNASharp and started playing. As a background, I have read quite a bit about antenna tuning/evaluation but have ZERO practical experience, so despite my

Excellent, Rudi. I'm not a big fan of the lines myself - they can easily obscure the fact that you've using a linear interpolation which could be very inaccurate. So I prefer to up the sweep count

Hello Rune, I just tested your version 0.007 under MacOS Mojave 10.14.6. The serial port was found correct. The lines between the points are looking good to me. 73, Rudi DL5FA

Hi Tom, thanks for the suggestion. I think that looks very workable. Sadly it's only been minutes since I released v0.0.7, which still has the "Reactance" label - but it won't be long before 0.0.8 (or

Hi Rune, With regards to the "Reactance" label I wonder if it would be beneficial to provide both C and L equivalent values for the measured X. Considering the 126.1 MHz example of Xc = 358 your might

Didn't know the earlier link could be a problem. Here is the taobao link for the RF demo kit: https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=a1z0d.6639537.1997196601.91.55f87484TXSwMA&id=602430115726 You may

Looks really great! 2 nits to pick: 1. It would be convenient if the marker summaries would included the frequency 2. It would be nice to scale the overall screen as it is too large to fit on my

FWIW I measured one of the 60 dB.com bridges at a directivity of ~40 dB using TDR with a Tek 11801 & 20 GHz SD-24. That was the ratio of the step on the incident output vs the pulse on the reflected

Thanks! I'll try that...

Hi Mario, if you click "display settings", you can change one of the 4 plots (or add up to two more), where one of the options is S11 VSWR. That should be the one you want? New feature since 0.0.4 ;-)

Yes, that fixed it - my report that 0.0.4 was doing it too was a PEBCAC error - I was launching that one from a script that now points to the new one... Great work. My only complaint about the general

Here is another person with the same issue. http://bobdavis321.blogspot.com/2019/08/nanovna-vector-network-analyzer-50khz.html Is it a hardware or a software issue? My analyzer doesn't seem quite as

Sorry, in all the clutter I failed to copy the beginning of the error message output (which of course is the part you care about)! hope you can figure it out - I was enjoying the earlier version… M

Erik, Perhaps I misunderstood. From this, sounded like you are thinking of removing the 390/50 loads: Regarding termination, I was thinking the 50 ohm resistors terminate whatever is coming from the

I just pushed what I believe to a be fix for an error like this at least to the repository: The app attempted to update the title of the main window in the thread reading the data, not the thread

On further testing: Now 0.0.4 is crashing the same way. This must be something the pip command did when I ran it to install 0.07. mpv

Wow. If you try running from a terminal window, you should get any error messages from the application on there. But I don't know if that's what you already did, and this was the entire error? The