Re: 3D printed nanoVNA-H BNC holder and binding post DUT holder
VK7AM email me -- 73 Bob? KD8CGH
By
Bob Benedict, KD8CGH
·
#18896
·
|
NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
Interesting, I've been making all my measurements using QT on my laptop, then panicked a bit when I read this, as I have made many tedious antenna[1] tweaks based on that data. But I just checked
By
AllassoPraise <allassopraise@...>
·
#18895
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
Ok, Bluetooth SPP NanoVNA piqued my interest. :) I'm going to look into that since I plan on using the 250m of antenna wire I just bought from SOTAbeams. :)
By
Richard - N1RBD
·
#18894
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
You might try running the calibration with whatever cable you're using to connect things to PC connected to device. The only other thing I've noticed occasionally is that if I sweep too wide a range
By
BryonB
·
#18893
·
|
NanoVNA, SAAV2+4, RigExpert
Hello All, I have a classic white gecko clone nano with the Sept firmware, and have been following its evolution here since last year. Also have been following all the progress with the V2 which has
By
Vince Rooney
·
#18892
·
|
Re: Looking into Nanovna
Yes, and this person also posted the exact same question on the Softrock and FT-817 forums, too. Makes me curious ... 73, Zack W9SZ wrote:
By
Zack Widup
·
#18891
·
|
Re: Smith chart - admittance scale ?
I would offer the idea of using a pre-calculated graphic overlay for the scales in the programs like NanoSaver. It seems a waste of processing to have to compute the chart impedance or admittance
By
W1RS
·
#18890
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
Remember that anything connected to the antenna system becomes part of it. For example if you disconnect the radio in order to connect the NanoVNA, you change the antenna system. If you change a cable
By
Martin
·
#18889
·
|
Re: Looking into Nanovna
There have been a couple of posts recently that have been questioned by the nanovna-user community. The moderators appreciate forum members voicing their concern and we continue to monitor those
By
Dave Daniel
·
#18888
·
|
Re: Looking into Nanovna
Brian, Well, some do post the same question on different forums all at the same time. Drives me mad if I spend ages answering on one forum and find it has also been answered on another. But quite a
By
Alan G4ZFQ
·
#18887
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
Yes, the grounding effect is definitely there. I used a common mode choke on the usb cable, and that solved the problem. Since I use my nano mostly on HF, I took a combo of two 35mm cores: 3S4 and 43
By
Arie Kleingeld PA3A
·
#18886
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
I have noticed the unit SWR changes from Battery to USB power and in the car I noticed Hand help changes it too. Some RF grounding effect?? -- Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse
By
Ed March
·
#18885
·
|
NanoVNA Saver showing SWR radically different than the device
#nanovna-saver
I went out to a park today to tune my EFHW and it seems that the latest NanoVNA saver shows a SWR that is significantly different than the device shows. I almost wound up cutting the wire too short
By
Richard - N1RBD
·
#18884
·
|
Re: Looking into Nanovna
This is the exact same question on the IC-7300 Forum. I asked the person to clarify. Pardon me if it's not legit but seems odd to see the same, exact question on other forums............. Brian/WB2JIX
By
Brian Duerr/WB2JIX
·
#18883
·
|
Re: 3D printed nanoVNA-H BNC holder and binding post DUT holder
whether nanovna H. Can I replace the LCD? because when exposed to the light it is not clear how it looks ... thank you Pada tanggal 19 Nov 2020 09:18, "Pierre Martel" <petem001@...> menulis:
By
Udin udi
·
#18882
·
|
Re: 3D printed nanoVNA-H BNC holder and binding post DUT holder
https://www.hobarthackerspace.org.au/ https://hobartmakers.com/ if you are not too far from Hobart you have at least 2 places around. And from those you will maybe find someone even closer. Have some
By
Pierre Martel <petem001@...>
·
#18881
·
|
Re: 3D printed nanoVNA-H BNC holder and binding post DUT holder
Thanks Bob. That technology isn't available down here in Tasmania. We are 20 years behind! USPS small packet in my experience is quite cheap and its fast as well... Again my thanks 73 Alan VK7AM
By
Alan Williams
·
#18880
·
|
Re: Serial communication with uC
#nanovna-v2
oh. You're doing a V2 - I don't know if the nanovna.py works with the V2 - maybe there's one matching the firmware for the V2.
By
Jim Lux
·
#18879
·
|
Re: Serial communication with uC
#nanovna-v2
Thanks for share this information Ed March! It will be very helpful.
By
Laps
·
#18878
·
|
Re: Serial communication with uC
#nanovna-v2
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:00 AM, Jim Lux wrote: > There are versions of the firmware (I don't know which, but the various > wikis probably have info) that support the on-board serial port. You'll >
By
Laps
·
#18877
·
|