¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Newbee with Nano VNA device
Rainer, If you remove power from the bias-tee, the LNA no longer works. But it almost certainly does not short input to output, and if it did it would not do so without adding extra loads to
By Jerry Gaffke · #17960 ·
Re: Basic Question About Complex Impedance Numbers
I believe the m stands for milli (1/1000). Mark *From:* Jim Lux ( jimlux@... ) *Sent:* Tuesday, October 6, 2020 9:44 AM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [nanovna-users] Basic
By Mark Erbaugh <mark.election@...> · #17959 ·
Re: Newbee with Nano VNA device
if your LNA is one that has a relay to bypass it when it's off, then yes, turning off the power would be what you need.
By Jim Lux · #17958 ·
Re: Newbee with Nano VNA device
Hi, I was thinking about this DC Blocks. If I understand correctly those DC Block block the DC current and without DC current my Low Noise Amplifier does not work, correct ? So if that is the case,
By Rainer <rsfoto@...> · #17957 ·
Re: SWR measurement of CB antenna with PL-259 #newbie
On Tuesday 06 October 2020 08:32:50 am DougVL wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 01:42 PM, <vitovsky.petr@...> wrote: > > > BTW I got my license few days ago, OK9PVV here :) I just don't have HF
By Roy J. Tellason, Sr. · #17956 ·
Re: Where did OneOfEleven go
Very Nice piece of software - Thank you to OneOfEleven Granted that I've spent the last couple of days coming up to speed on the NanoVNA and the other PC apps for it before I found this a few hours
By Ross Filipi · #17955 ·
Re: Basic Question About Complex Impedance Numbers
milli. so it's 0.697 ohms.
By Jim Lux · #17954 ·
Re: New open source VNA released - excellent performance claimed
Won by the SMA'ers evidently, and rightfully so in this application. Most of my adult life has been spent working on radar systems, from 1 to 22 GHz. The determining factor in whether SMA or N
By John AE5X · #17953 ·
Re: SWR measurement of CB antenna with PL-259 #newbie
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 02:32 PM, DougVL wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 01:42 PM, <vitovsky.petr@...> wrote: > > In that case, you will eventually want to use the NanoVNA on other antennas
By vitovsky.petr@... · #17952 ·
Re: SWR measurement of CB antenna with PL-259 #newbie
In that case, you will eventually want to use the NanoVNA on other antennas as well. It will be REALLY worthwhile to get a few connector adapters. I have gotten sets of UHF/PL259 and of BNC adapters
By DougVL · #17951 ·
Re: New open source VNA released - excellent performance claimed
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 09:19 PM, OneOfEleven wrote: USB CDC can go at 1MByte a second without any problem really, though using libUSB is good
By hwalker · #17950 ·
Re: Basic Question About Complex Impedance Numbers
Thank you very much Christian. That was what I suspected, but wanted confirmation. Ed
By ED - N1MVP · #17949 ·
Re: Basic Question About Complex Impedance Numbers
"m" simply means "milli". I.e., 56.3 - j*0.697 ohms.
By Christian Zietz · #17948 ·
Basic Question About Complex Impedance Numbers
Hello all... I have a dipole that I ran a sweep on with NanoVNA Saver, and a NanoVNA-H. When looking at the complex impedance at the closest point to resonance ('0' reactance), I get numbers
By ED - N1MVP · #17947 ·
Re: Save a test configuration?
Thank you Larry!
By mrutkaus K4QET · #17946 ·
Re: SOLT Error Theory #calibration
Great set of references. In addition to Dave's HP application note links, there are more here: http://hpmemoryproject.org/technics/bench/8510/bench_8510_home.htm . The 8510 documentation is
By John Miles · #17945 ·
Re: New open source VNA released - excellent performance claimed
Yes, using binary data transfer, USB-CDC is no problem at all. But this is a completely restarted project. Jan developed this project completely independently. We can consider compatibility in the
By Hugen · #17944 ·
Re: SOLT Error Theory #calibration
First let me add that the load standard does not have to be ideal, it only has to be known. You can reformulate the SOL calibration to account for a non-ideal load. The same of course applies to short
By Christian Zietz · #17943 ·
Re: SOLT Error Theory #calibration
As a rough guide, you need the load to have a return loss of 10 dB higher than what you are measuring to get a measurement uncertainty of 1 dB. So a 30 dB return loss load will enable measurement of
By Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd · #17942 ·
Re: SOLT Error Theory #calibration
Hey Alan, Thanks, I got it downloaded and installed. This appears to be for seeing uncertainty given a specific model VNA and cal kit. It's quite interesting but if I had my own cal kit, how might I
By RayC · #17941 ·