开云体育

Doubting the accuracy of my NanoVNA H4. Is there a way for a non electronics minded person to verify the accuracy of my H4? I am a beginner with the NanoVNA. I have calibrated the unit per

I have two 259 variants and will probably keep both of them. They are a good tool for the primary job intended, and are arguably a better solution for non-technical hams who don't want to be bothered

While I appreciate and respect all the opinions here, I feel the need to reply. I have owned MFJ-259 and nanoVNA and can say without question that the nano is far superior in every way that is

The NanoVNA and the MFJ AA are directed to 2 different groups of people. The MFJ is more of an entry level testing device that take care of checking an antenna in a fast and simple way, like using a

You are being kind here Radu ;-) As my name can hint a bit at my original language, you can figure that I learned english later in my life. I also found that english can be dry. But it is not the

Yes, tuning in the "design a matching network" sense - which is why I think it's more a design tool - you look at the smith chart, figure out what components/networks will make it work. That's

Well, Jim, I'm a total nerd when it comes to RF and the HP 8753C. And, yes, I've tuned / adjusted antennas using only the Smith Chart. Those were antennas aimed at UHF and the Hi line at 1420 MHz

Likely a language barrier issue. English is a very dry, down to facts, goal-oriented language; it can sound a bit abrasive to non-native speakers (especially romance languages ones). I happen to know

It really addresses a totally different need. The MFJ is a handy device - Having a meter needle/LCD display to see the "dip" at resonance is a pretty fast way to trim a dipole. (with all it's

I believe that the subject of the post is the issue although I don't see anything wrong with it either.

I wondered the same thing myself. The 404 may have been glitch at github or maybe a mistyping of the url but I didn't think it was terribly disrespectful to ask about it. But maybe we are missing

See, a little love shared there. They say it makes the world go round Frank ;)

I used to have an MFJ-259. Errors and misreadings were common, especially at the extremes of frequency ranges. Also, tolerance on readings were about 20% or worse - bad...... And MFJ misleads on

Roger's TLW also runs in Wine on Linux.

Transmission Line Details seems to run just fine under Wine in Linux.

[Note: I posted the following SAA-2N review on the V2 users group. The attached stock photo is only representative of the internals of the SAA-2N and the warped faceplate shown does not appear to be

OneOfEleven, Any objective reading would infer the "glee" over MFJ being "peed-off." They're not. And...sales do not seem to be hurt much as they can't keep up manufacturing production of their

Carson, Read any manual for a MFJ A-A..you'll see the section on calibration. MFJ sells calibration sets for their MFJ259/269 A-As. Frank K4FMH --- Frank M. Howell, PhD Professor Emeritus,

Perdad, The download link that I gave from the ARRL is missing a couple of files. I have put everything required in one zip file. I have verified that it now runs on Windows 7 and windows 8.1 (64

Why would I be disappointed ? I was only thinking the obvious. It's far better to share love, not hatefulness, xx