¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Help Testing a Low Pass Filter
I modeled your 40-Meter LPF using your values on ELSIE. Please see attachment for the results of what you should measure for pass characteristics (S21). Dave - W?LEV -- *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let
By W0LEV · #14057 ·
Re: NanoVNASaver Runtime Fault on Manjaro / Arch Linux #nanovna-saver #linux
yes: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9644099/python-ascii-codec-cant-decode-byte
By Oristo · #14056 ·
Re: Help Testing a Low Pass Filter
Hi, thanks for the replies. It's a QRP Labs filter which uses the 7 element design shown in the attached schematic. I attached the wrong image in the first post. That's the response of the 40m filter,
By GM7 · #14055 ·
Re: Help Testing a Low Pass Filter
Which schematic and values did you use? That amplitude curve is weird. Also, VSWR is very high on marker 3 (30 m) Jos¨¦, CO2JA
By Jose Amador · #14054 ·
Re: Help Testing a Low Pass Filter
True. Something does not look right. Rather than running 3 through 50 MHz, try setting, calibrating, and measuring 5 through 20 MHz. Also, before you measure, to check your cal., do a Smith chart of
By W0LEV · #14053 ·
Help Testing a Low Pass Filter
Hi All, I'm trying to test a set of Low Pass Filters for 40m, 30m, 20m & 10m. I'm getting consistent results for each of them but not the results I expected. I'm struggling to establish whether the
By GM7 · #14052 ·
Re: Review of S-A-A-2 #nanovna-v2
Dear Cliff, Thank you, my biggest problem that i am new in linux enviroment, so far I developed under windows. I can try to understand your advice... If I have results or new question then I will come
By Zoli · #14051 ·
Re: Review of S-A-A-2 #nanovna-v2
Kedves Gyula, K?szi, megn¨¦zem... Nagy 73, Zoli
By Zoli · #14050 ·
NanoVNASaver Runtime Fault on Manjaro / Arch Linux #nanovna-saver #linux
Hi, all- First off, I have seen the many threads related to PyQT5, and I do not believe that this is the problem. Additionally, since Arch / Manjaro Linux is a distribution with rolling updates, the
By Ignilux · #14049 ·
Re: Installed an ST32F303 in my Ver 1 nanoVNA #hardware #firmware #bootloader #hack #mods
Thank you for the info, hugen. If there is no 8MHz xtal - I assume I will see the "Unknown USB device on port xx" error? Since I can push S/W to the unit using my ST-Link,? do you know the location
By Larry Rothman · #14048 ·
Re: Installed an ST32F303 in my Ver 1 nanoVNA #hardware #firmware #bootloader #hack #mods
Hello Larry, STM32F303 comes with a bootloader, but you must connect an external 8M crystal to use DFU mode. This is why the independent 8M crystal is used on the nanoVNA-H4 instead of the 8MHz clock
By Hugen · #14047 ·
Installed an ST32F303 in my Ver 1 nanoVNA #hardware #firmware #bootloader #hack #mods
Ken/Hugen - I just installed a new ST32F303 on to my original NanoVNA and it is not recognized by USB (Yes, I installed 1.5K pull-up on pin33) so I assume I need to install the DFU bootloader. Where
By Larry Rothman · #14046 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Link for case https://www.prusaprinters.org/prints/30212-case-for-nanovna-v2
By tgraeve@... · #14045 ·
Re: out of "Presentation on the NanoVNA for the raileigh Radio Society", Now: "False Return Loss Calculations"
Yep, this is exactly what I do in courses. If you know what loss is, and know what is meant by return loss, reading a text with a plus or a minus is no real bother. But if they have to write up
By Arie Kleingeld PA3A · #14044 ·
Re: out of "Presentation on the NanoVNA for the raileigh Radio Society", Now: "False Return Loss Calculations"
On your other aspect of return loss: Hi Dana and all, Yes, indeed at low frequencies lossy transmission lines can have a complex characteristic line impedance. In that case even some 2.141 > Gamma1 >
By DJ7BA · #14043 ·
Re: Review of S-A-A-2 #nanovna-v2
The Makefile is trying to get the current head revision identifier from git - but you have the source code without a git checkout. You should find the git repository you want to work from and clone
By Clifford Heath · #14042 ·
Re: out of "Presentation on the NanoVNA for the raileigh Radio Society", Now: "False Return Loss Calculations"
Hello all, What you do in your own shop (or ham shack) is of course your own business. But if you teach, please, please, teach that a passive load's return loss is a positive number of dB, as it is
By Dana Whitlow · #14041 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Thanks for the directions! Now I have both devices and both groups! 73 Dana VE3DS
By Dana Shtun · #14040 ·
Re: Review of S-A-A-2 #nanovna-v2
Szia Zoli, NanoVNA-H4-hez k¨¦sz¨ªtett Bluetooth el¨¦rhet?s¨¦get AA6KL, n¨¦zd meg : https://github.com/AA6KL/NanoVNA-H4/releases 73, Gyula HA3HZ -- *** nothing is permanent only change (
By Gyula Molnar · #14039 ·
Re: Review of S-A-A-2 #nanovna-v2
Dear David, Thank you for your answer, your proposal is a good idea, but I would like to use cpu gpio ports to control wifi communication... Many thanks and 73,
By Zoli · #14038 ·