Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hello Hans-Peter, you're right: The algorithm assumes that the first -3dB point it finds is the -3dB point of the filter. I'm not certain what's a good and generic way to avoid this to allow filters
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6841
·
|
Re: Spurs around 300MHz
All nanoVNA use the internal SI5351 outside the formal supported spec. e.g. upto 300MHz in fundamental mode. Above 300MHz it switches to harmonics mode (till 900 MHz) and even further harmonics modes
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#6840
·
|
Spurs around 300MHz
Please see the attached pictures. The one in the case I am calling the good one the other one has issues. 1. Spur on display around 300MHz. This appears to change and amplitude but is always there. 2.
By
Sam Reaves
·
#6839
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hello Rune, First of all many thanks for this great software! Maybe you can watch the bandwidth calculation again. A ripple on a bandpass does not capture the filter width correctly. In the attachment
By
Hans-Peter
·
#6838
·
|
Re: Wait for NanoVNA-V2.....
F-2 might be a nice instrument to wait for... hopefully w/full 4 port setup extended f range and the larger display. Really I think there are solutions for the current display issue including the
By
chuckt
·
#6837
·
|
Re: Wait for NanoVNA-V2.....
I for one would like to see options to hack in a larger screen. Even one the size of the screen used on the HP/Agilent/Keysight HP8753D. It would be great to be able to turn one of these into a bench
By
Sam Reaves
·
#6836
·
|
Re: 1500Mhz, usable ?
Mine appears to be 100Hz steps. Test method, use receiver, listen to span set for 300Hz and I can hear 3 distinct tones. Does the newer firmware use lower steps ? 73 de Andy
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#6835
·
|
Re: My NanoVNA is not recognised by DFUse when using V 0.2.3 firmware
I've been trying to get this working - keeps coming back and saying the ID doesn't match even though it does.? Since the last commit to this was several years ago - there is most likely some bugs
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6834
·
|
Re: 1500Mhz, usable ?
If you are using original firmware and touchscreen control, then this map shows where to set START and STOP frequencies (under STIMULUS) http://ormpoa.altervista.org/Hnano.htm These settings can be
By
Oristo
·
#6833
·
|
Re: Duplexfilter tuning question
I ordered a set of attenuators on Ebay. Logarithmic and linear... I'm not at home right now but when I get back, I'll try it on the computer.
By
Roland
·
#6832
·
|
Re: 1500Mhz, usable ?
Thanks everyone for the info. I have what appears to be a two trace version, 900Mhz, and to be honest it appears to be satisfactory. No crashes etc. Although there is one thing that I have not yet
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#6831
·
|
Re: Any plans to publish the NanoVNA board files
Gabriel is the layout designer and RF engineer /g/nanovna-users/message/3420 /g/nanovna-users/message/3984 /g/nanovna-users/message/4092
By
Oristo
·
#6830
·
|
Re: Any plans to publish the NanoVNA board files
https://github.com/nanovna
By
Oristo
·
#6829
·
|
Re: My NanoVNA is not recognised by DFUse when using V 0.2.3 firmware
I found this GitHub project for DFU installation by Android app https://github.com/UmbrelaSmart/android-stm32-dfu-programmer
By
Oristo
·
#6828
·
|
Re: Wait for NanoVNA-V2.....
The github page you refer to is from Henrik Forsten, so it is not "mostly a copy of this nice design", it is the very same design! Op 11-11-2019 om 13:19 schreef erik@...:
By
Reinier Gerritsen
·
#6827
·
|
Re: Any plans to publish the NanoVNA board files
Hi Gabriel, What you are saying sounds fantastic. That is the kind of project that I would like to be a part of. I don't have a need to see the designs early. I'll be patient, and get involved when
By
dhu1342@...
·
#6826
·
|
Re: Any plans to publish the NanoVNA board files
Trying one more time to add the attachments.
By
dhu1342@...
·
#6825
·
|
Re: Any plans to publish the NanoVNA board files
Hi Hugen, Thanks for joining the conversation. I appreciate all of the work that you have put into this design, and for your efforts to turn it into an actual product. Your work seems to have been the
By
dhu1342@...
·
#6824
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
Use QRP firmware: https://github.com/qrp73/NanoVNA-Q/releases Based on my own trivial experiments, metal enclosure for worse unshielded clone makes things somewhat worse above 600MHz. Otherwise,
By
Oristo
·
#6822
·
|
Re: Looking for firmware with battery indicator, 1500 and big font
if you worrying about battery indicator, you can try NanoVNA-Q: https://github.com/qrp73/NanoVNA-Q/releases it has allows to calibrate battery offset. So, you can tune it for your diode. In addition
By
QRP RX
·
#6821
·
|