Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 05:01 PM, KE8CPD wrote:
This PLL icon means that si5351 failed to setup some frequencies during sweep. There are two possible reasons: 1) bad configuration settings (it may store invalid frequencies for the sweep) 2) bad quality of si5351 which cannot work at 300 MHz First try to cleanup configuration settings. You can do it with "clearconfig 1234" command from PuTTY console. If it doesn't help and PLL icon is still there, it means that your si5351 chip cannot work at 300 MHz. You can fix it by reduce threshold frequency below 300 MHz and use saveconfig command to save that change. It means that working range will be less than normal si5351. Also, you can replace si5351 with a good one in order to fix that. |
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:19 PM, hb9 iiu wrote:
Hi , now I upgraded to 3.0.1 , but the problem is still present. I think is not possibile to have more than 101 points. And sweep cmd , not allow to set step size , but agin number of points. Now I very busy , next week I will try again . Maurizio IZ1MDJ |
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 08:01 AM, KE8CPD wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QRP's 0.4.2 firmware includes a hardware check for the si5351. It tests if your NanoVNA will operate reliably above 300 MHz. The PLL symbol means that his firmware test has determined that your si5351 may have reliability problems above 300 MHz. - Herb |
Re: Deal on ebay
Just got my money back from the last bogus eBay listing at $19.95!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Roy WA0YMH On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, 9:20 AM hb9 iiu <hb9iiu@...> wrote:
Just ordered one for fun at $15.99... ref 254398992632 |
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
Hi KE8CPD -
Not sure what the PLL means in this firmwareThat is also the first time I have seen it, but it explains your crazy plot. QRP added a check for those clock chips which cannot do 300MHz. The workaround is set 'threshold' from USB shell to some value less than 300000000. |
Re: errors of "error" models
#70: facupov : a 64-bit working maxima under windows in 2 cases
Hello, Allow us, please, to inform you that after hard days-and-nights of many-many trials-and-errors, including tedious searching for the lemmas below (e.g. in [1]-[3]), we just succeeded to install in two 64-bit Windows systems in our PC of an AMD CPU, a Working 64-bit Maxima, but with the cost of disabling the whole DEP (Data Execution Prevention) Protection in these Windows systems - * That * Is * You * Have * Been * Warned * - as follows: - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - I/II : w7p64 (1) Run as Administrator: | wmic OS Get DataExecutionPrevention_Available the right reply is: | DataExecutionPrevention_Available | TRUE if not, then STOP trying - FAILURE. (2) Run as Administrator: | BCDEDIT /SET {CURRENT} NX ALWAYSOFF (3) Restart (4) Run as Administrator: | wmic OS Get DataExecutionPrevention_SupportPolicy the Right Reply is: | DataExecutionPrevention_SupportPolicy | 0 if not, then STOP trying - FAILURE. (5) Run: | E:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\lispselector.bat Select : CLISP (6) Run Xmaxima the Right Response is: | Lisp CLISP 2.49 (2010-07-07) if it is, then : SUCCESS if not, then: (7) Run: E:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\lispselector.bat Select : SBCL (8) Run Xmaxima the Right Response is: | Lisp SBCL 1.4.14 if not, then stop trying : FAILURE if it is, then : SUCCESS. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II/II : wxpp64&sp2 (1) Create a desktop shortcut icon for cmd.exe Mouse Right Click on cmd.exe icon Select: Run as... (o) Current user (...) [v] Run this program with restricted access and uncheck it to: [ ] Run this program with restricted access (2) In this Command Window run: | wmic OS Get DataExecutionPrevention_Available the Right Reply is: | DataExecutionPrevention_Available | TRUE if not, then stop trying - FAILURE (3) Select: |Start|Settings|Control Panel|System|Advanced| |Startup and Recovery|Settings|Edit| go to the line of this wxpp64&sp2 system in boot.ini and add the switch: | /NOEXECUTE=ALWAYSOFF (4) Restart (5) Mouse Right Click on cmd.exe icon Select: Run as... (o) Current user (...) [v] Run this program with restricted access uncheck it to: [ ] Run this program with restricted access (6) In this Command Window run: | wmic OS Get DataExecutionPrevention_SupportPolicy the Right Reply is: | DataExecutionPrevention_SupportPolicy | 0 if not, then stop trying - FAILURE (7) Download and install gnuplot 5.0.7 64-bit [1] on your system disk "X" at: | X:\Program Files\gnuplot (8) Download and install 64-bit maxima-5.43.0 [2] on your system disk "X" at: | X:\maxima-5.43.0 but take into account, please, that * t h i s * Maxima also installs the 64-bit gnuplot 5.2.7 at your system disk "X" at: | X:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\gnuplot (9) Copy the whole: | X:\Program Files\gnuplot over: | X:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\gnuplot (10) Run: | E:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\lispselector.bat Select : SBCL (11) Run Xmaxima the Right Response is: | Lisp SBCL 1.4.14 if it is, then: SUCCESS if not then: (12) Run: | E:\maxima-5.43.0\bin\lispselector.bat Select : CLISP (13) Run Xmaxima: the Right Response is: | Lisp CLISP 2.49 (2010-07-07) if not, then stop trying - FAILURE if it is, then : SUCCESS. - - - end : (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 - - - - - - - - - - References: [1] -, "Installation of Maxima in Windows": [2] MS Support, "How to determine that hardware DEP is available and configured on your computer": Last Updated: Apr 17, 2018 [3] Rajesh Babu Ramachandran, "How To Enable or Disable DEP In Windows XP, Vista or windows 7?": [4] maxima-clisp-sbcl-5.43.0-win64.exe: [5] gp507-win64-mingw.exe: Sincerely, gin&pez@arg :70# |
Which firmware ? (Survey)
Just to see what user think is the best currently available firmware.
I use the device to process data via Python because the first one I received had a faulty screen (strap was actually not soldered to the board....) Its to tune a magnetic loop antenna..... So, what is the firmware developper like the most at the moment? |
Re: Firmware and dfu-util (Linux)
On 02/11/2019 11:13, Barry Jackson via Groups.Io wrote:
On 01/11/2019 22:48, QRP RX wrote:OK, I was missing the start address.On Fri, Nov? 1, 2019 at 07:46 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:Thanks for your reply,16 kB is a page size. It means data chunk size which controller can accept for flashing. ############################################################### [baz@localhost Original]$ dfu-util -a 0 -s 0x08000000 -U original.bin -vv dfu-util 0.9 Copyright 2005-2009 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc. Copyright 2010-2016 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY Please report bugs to Opening DFU capable USB device... ID 0483:df11 Run-time device DFU version 011a Claiming USB DFU Interface... Setting Alternate Setting #0 ... Determining device status: state = dfuIDLE, status = 0 dfuIDLE, continuing DFU mode device DFU version 011a Device returned transfer size 2048 DfuSe interface name: "Internal Flash " Memory segment at 0x08000000 64 x 2048 = 131072 (rew) Limiting upload to end of memory segment, 131072 bytes Poll timeout 72 ms Poll timeout 72 ms Upload [=========================] 100% 131072 bytes Upload done. [baz@localhost Original]$ ############################################################# So, armed with this backup, I felt more confident to try to upload your (QRP) firmware. ############################################################# [baz@localhost NanoVNA]$ dfu-util -a 0 -D NanoVNA-0.3.0m.dfu dfu-util 0.9 Copyright 2005-2009 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc. Copyright 2010-2016 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY Please report bugs to Match vendor ID from file: 0483 Match product ID from file: 0000 Opening DFU capable USB device... ID 0483:df11 Run-time device DFU version 011a Claiming USB DFU Interface... Setting Alternate Setting #0 ... Determining device status: state = dfuERROR, status = 10 dfuERROR, clearing status Determining device status: state = dfuIDLE, status = 0 dfuIDLE, continuing DFU mode device DFU version 011a Device returned transfer size 2048 DfuSe interface name: "Internal Flash " file contains 1 DFU images parsing DFU image 1 image for alternate setting 0, (1 elements, total size = 87457) parsing element 1, address = 0x08000000, size = 87449 Download [=========================] 100% 87449 bytes Download done. done parsing DfuSe file [baz@localhost NanoVNA]$ ############################################################## Seems to be working fine so far. Phew!! Barry G4MKT |
Re: Who has used the nanoVNA wiki to find information?
#wiki
links to the Wiki and FILE sections in the forum signatureI use the main page to quickly find links to even my own pages. FWIW, I expect (and try to help) Wiki main page to be mostly up-to-date, but necessarily brief. Other pages and links are for more detailed information, but less likely frequent updates, lacking feedback and fewer contributors. GitHub documentation has yet no pull requests, thankfully, since I have not yet successfully processed any test pull request.. I contemplate a substantial rewrite to /g/nanovna-users/wiki/shellcommands because format is hard to edit and information is neither more helpful nor timely than /g/nanovna-users/files/NanoVNA_Console_Commands_Oct-30-19.pdf .. which has the disadvantage of link changes when updated. |
Re: Deal on ebay
Alexandre Souza
There is no such thing as a free lunch =)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
---8<---Corte aqui---8<--- ---8<---Corte aqui---8<--- Em s¨¢b, 2 de nov de 2019 ¨¤s 10:12, Don via Groups.Io <donald_s_58103= [email protected]> escreveu: Looks like this was a scam after all. The negative feedback is now pouring |
Re: Voltage sensing diode
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 07:41 AM, Nick wrote:
With BAV99 2 diodes and a fully charged battery set vbat_offset to 1000 andI didn't know why you liked the BAV99 until I just looked them up. Nice! Puzzled because the BAV99 data sheet says VF=0.7V max @ 1mA, and we are well below that...so I'd expect much less than 0,7V offset. Yet you report 4.2V for a 1V offset. On the whole, I really like the approach. WRT the comment re pads on the PCB, the 16K resistor would go across the D2 pads, and a 100K from D2- to gnd. I have not looked specifically at what to do, but recall from my earlier peeks at the PCB that there seem to be plenty of places to tie the 100K to gnd in the area. WRT "sufficient vbat_offset", it would be zero, so no problem. The point is that software would have to be modded from (what I think is) the current Actual = measured + sufficient vbat_offset, a form of linear equation of y=1*measured + sufficient vbat_offset to a form of linear equation of y=slope*measured + sufficient vbat_offset. where users would then have to enter both a slope and offset. ISo why resistors? Because the diode approach leaves is either sourcing special diodes such as the BAV99 or the SD103AWS, whereas the resistor approach seems more convenient. Maybe not. If I try the resistors, I'll just put in vbat_offset=1000mV, and live with the increasing (small) error as voltage drops. Theoretically, at 3V, I'd be expecting 2.25V, but I'll see 2.00...because I think of the indication as something general, I am mot too fussy about accuracy. Same goes for any behaviour we might put into the VNA based on battery voltage...if it makes the choice a little early, that's OK. The voltage regulator shuts down at 3V, so any action we consider in the future needs to be safely above the. Meanwhile, the battery symbol is just a rough gas gauge. Meanwhile, I was expecting the new battery to be 8+ lines high (based upon something QRP mentioned, but I forget), so it will be interesting to see how it relates to battery voltage...looks to be maybe 10 lines now. My car has something like this *** ** * **** *** ** * and they are grey to start, then as the values rise, what ever is lit turn from red > yellow > green. So I always have at least a red dot at the bottom, then it goes from there But I admit that the battery outline is very recognizable. -- On the banks of the Piscataqua Rich NE1EE |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss