Electrical 1/2 wave.
I have a NanaVNA-H4,
And how would I use it to make an exact 1/2 wave or multiple there-of coax?
1/2, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc...
Joe WB9SBD
By
Joe WB9SBD
·
#39914
·
|
Re: NEgative resistance for S11 port antenna measurement
Have you tried reducing the sweep range? It might be informative to reduce the sweep to 25MHz starting at 300MHz, OSL calibrate at the measurement plane and run the sweep. Then move up 25MHz
By
Steve Withnell
·
#39913
·
|
Re: NEgative resistance for S11 port antenna measurement
You might be receiving strong signals with that antenna, that interfere with the nanoVNA's measurements. If that's the case, at least some of the excursions to negative resistance should not repeat on
By
Manfred Mornhinweg
·
#39912
·
|
Re: NEgative resistance for S11 port antenna measurement
** I think it would have been relevant, since you use nanaovna-saver, to post your .s1p files with your participation.
--
F1AMM
Fran?ois
By
Fran?ois
·
#39911
·
|
NEgative resistance for S11 port antenna measurement
Hello,
v0.7.3 on Windows;
Already had my nanovna calibrated in two range: 30 MHz around 315 and another 30 MHz around 434; used an average of 10 sweeps with ~saver which has produced some partly
By
kellogs
·
#39910
·
|
Re: New HW version 3.6.1 observations and questions
Use Zeetk (SMC5351A + custom mixer, but this option also work on SM_ST device) or MS5351
By
DiSlord
·
#39909
·
|
Re: New HW version 3.6.1 observations and questions
In the latest software version: 1.2.43/NanoVNA-H-ZK_20250220.dfu there is an additional generator setting.
Now we have three options in the MODE 1. MS5351 2. ZEETK 3. Si5351.
What to choose with
By
SP1RAC
·
#39908
·
|
Re: Buying new VNA
Few people on the LibreVNA list did that, maybe ask there.
IMHO it's not worth it. Sourcing some of the components is a problem and
machining the enclosure is another one.
[email protected]>
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#39907
·
|
Re: Buying new VNA
I wonder how much will cost to build LibreVNA / BOM + PCB price /.Thank you
By
yura717
·
#39906
·
|
Re: red LED no longer lights
Clyde,
THANK YOU!!! I did not catch the difference earlier, used the H4 firmware and all is working well now!
Thank you.
Bill WB6YVK
By
William Brooks
·
#39905
·
|
Re: red LED no longer lights
If I read your post correctly,
"nanoVNA-H4 hardware build 4.3 using the NanoVNA-H.v1.2.40.bin "
Your problem is you used the WRONG firmware!!!
You can not use "H" firmware on a "H4"!!!!!
And expect
By
Clyde Lambert
·
#39904
·
|
Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux
Just did a quick search re nanovna-saver and mint and found a set of instructions for you to follow here:
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=410869
________________________________
Sent:
By
M0CNL
·
#39903
·
|
Re: Running NanoVNA Saver (or other software) on Linux
Yes Sudo was what I meant to type but either I fat fingered it on my phone or it was auto corrected to Suso. So sorry about that.
________________________________
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 8:09:50
By
M0CNL
·
#39902
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
I am locking this topic as it has gone far afield of discussion related to NanoVNAs.
By
Dave Daniel
·
#39901
·
|
red LED no longer lights
I have updated the firmware on my nanoVNA-H4 hardware build 4.3 using the NanoVNA-H.v1.2.40.bin file and STM32cube software, and notice that
the red battery LED no longer lights when charging or unit
By
William Brooks
·
#39900
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
Quite right, however backdoors are not the usual attack vector for viruses and malware. The attack is tricking users into executing something they shouldn't.
"William McLaughlin via groups.io"
By
Jim Shorney
·
#39899
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
History is interesting, you can learn a lot from it. I heard that one of the first times the term ‘bug’ was used involved a moth that got into a relay, keeping it from operating.
This group is
By
Gary H Thompson
·
#39898
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
As I understand it, back doors were (and presumably, still are) created by
programmers as a convenience. They use them because it's quicker for
getting into a system than going through the login
By
William McLaughlin
·
#39897
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
If you read it again, you will see that I said what a back door is, I didn’t say it was a virus, it was how a virus was put in computers. Didn’t mean to start an argument.
--
Sent from Canary
By
Gary H Thompson
·
#39896
·
|
Locked
Re: McAFee Virus Scanner Objects to nanoSaver download from GitHub
A backdoor is not a virus. Viruses and malware are created by programmers with malicious intent in order to spread mayhem or for financial gain. A lot of it is offshore these days. It may be fun to
By
Jim Shorney
·
#39895
·
|