开云体育

Hi Rune, Understood. I really like Saver and very much appreciate what you have achieved so far, especially in such a short space of time, and I'm very grateful for your effort and dedication. A lot

I have not read the article by Owen, but I would agree on this single point about return loss. But I never commented to you, as it is a subject of much debate. If there was a very clear majorty for

Thanks, Herb and Rune! Wiki now has a "Hardware Versions" link: /g/nanovna-users/wiki ====================== Perhaps the nanoVNA-F could be added? Thanks, David -- SatSignal Software

It is often useful to think about frequencies in terms of octaves or harmonics, where 900 is less than an octave above 500MHz, so potentially of interest e.g. for filter evaluations

[email protected]> wrote: *As soon as I looked at Rune's software, I thought "Return loss should not

Hi Martin, there are firmware versions that go to 1500MHz. The frequency limit does nothing to limit the number of data points, and very, very little to limit other features within the NanoVNA. It's

Hi All, I've been reading the comment about frequency range vs sample size and other issues and I'd like to suggest / discuss some thoughts. Although it's nice to have the capability to measure up to

Hi Martin, I too read Owen's post. I'm not particularly fond of his way of implying that I would be "resistant to correction"; and calling what I do "very hammy". If it is one's intention to post like

Thanks, Herb and Rune! Wiki now has a "Hardware Versions" link: /g/nanovna-users/wiki

Although more difficult to implement in the firmware, and a PITA for users, it would not be surprising if even better performance could be obtained by * Setting C0 to 0 * Reading C1 from the datasheet

Hi All, I've been using my Nano quite extensively in the workshop, and I find it very handy for quickly checking the value of surface mount components, particularly capacitors and inductors. It would

Hi All: I am selling my recently acquired NanoVNA , this a hugen version from aliexpress, includes the necessary calibration items also I am including a ST-link V2 programmer. $55.00 includes shipping

Hi All, Owen Duffy has recently posted a note about the Nano VNA on his blog. https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=15747 He makes a few points about the accuracy of calculated values with both the Nano VNA

The block diagram is missing the measurement of the reference signal? Op 4-10-2019 om 12:31 schreef hwalker:

In your web space I see many files, I need only DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu and an executable program, is it correct? Should I find the program.exe? ..Again: Reasons you might want to upgrade: 1. TDR

Hello group, some remarks: take a look at Raspberry Pi 3.5" lcds with 480x320 resolution, or bare with ILI9486/ILI9488 controller (a lot of them can be found on chinese shops) please consider the

Rob, Please understand that "DMR-CLEAR_MEMORY_DFU.dfu" will wipe your device and it will not work until you re-load whatever firmware you are upgrading to. It is used to give you a clean slate prior

I am wondering if the nanoVNA could be used to measure the noise figure for a preamp. If it could, I am assuming it would use S21 results in some manner.

Herb, thanks for V2 logical schematics. I'm following the V2 topic with a lot of interest. Diego

Pluto, That looks like the design currently being sold. V2 will use two synthesizers that overlap and allow it to exceed a 1 GHz measurement range (see attachment). Herb