Re: Nano VNA reference with 4'' screen
https://www.amazon.com/AURSINC-10KHz-1-5GHz-Measuring-Parameters-1950mAh-4-2/dp/B083PQ4RXZ/ref=sr_1_8?crid=BWM1RZZJ1JBF&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.KpK0Pfjf8M6oqS_O_Es2Gyq43lpvi3jAGNy9yb_3rBGGrSfKCI2NezVbsO5n4u5
By
Karl Henry
·
#38414
·
|
Nano VNA reference with 4'' screen
Hi All I am looking to get a Nano VNA reference that have 4'' screen and an open source code below 150Euro price if possible to pointed me to some reference with possible links to the vendors .
By
Team-SIM SIM-Mode
·
#38413
·
|
Re: Anti-Glare
Hello Here is my reasoning regarding this problem of visibility of the NanoVNA screen outside. This case only applies to an antenna that will be connected to the station by a coaxial transmission
By
Fran?ois
·
#38412
·
|
Re: Anti-Glare
I guess VERY carefully? And maybe more than one pair in a mosaic pattern. Clyde
By
Clyde Lambert
·
#38411
·
|
Re: Anti-Glare
Hi That helps.. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004824025087.html Part of the problem is the brightness that is lacking. YMMV...
By
josephlevy
·
#38410
·
|
Re: Anti-Glare
Clyde . . . I'd like to see that done!!! Donald KX8K
By
Donald Hellen
·
#38409
·
|
Re: Anti-Glare
Hello, This has been discussed several times before. If you resurch past posts, you will fine that " SUN SHADES" made for digital cameras and displays, anti glare screen savers for cellphones and
By
Clyde Lambert
·
#38408
·
|
Anti-Glare
Hi, Does anyone has solve the problem to read under the sun? Thank
By
andbro1965@...
·
#38407
·
|
Locked
Re: GRAVITATION BOOK & General Relativity
All, I am locking this thread. DaveD KC0WJN Thanks for all the fish. ============================== All spelling mistakes are the responsibilty of the reader (Rick Renz, STK, ca. 1994)
By
Dave Daniel
·
#38406
·
|
Locked
GRAVITATION BOOK & General Relativity
I have the *Gravitation* book by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (publisher: Princeton University Press, ISBN: 978-0-691-17779-3) . Even the first chapter without math gives a good rendition of what's in
By
W0LEV
·
#38405
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It would be well deserved. Could try it in space but wave to watch out for those pesky Quantum Fluctuations. Hi. --
By
Hoffy
·
#38404
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
David: About time! K2TNO [email protected]> wrote:
By
William Schrader
·
#38403
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Folks, this thread went off topic and continues to be off topic. While the off topic is very interesting it doesn't really have anything to do with the nanovna, so please do't post any more about
By
Dave Daniel
·
#38402
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It's more than 20 years since I reviewed the analysis predicting gravity waves, but it involves the warping of space-time itself.? Not sure that the dielectric constant is included.? It can be found
By
Andrew Lopatin
·
#38401
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Great reading that saga. Thanks 73 Bill K2TNO [email protected]> wrote:
By
William Schrader
·
#38400
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
It would be a very very interesting experiment to measurethe velocity of Gravity Waves though materials with differentdielectric constants.???? I predict a Nobel Prize at least!
By
KENT BRITAIN
·
#38399
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Hi, just a question. As I understand it, light waves and radio waves react with matter which might slow down their passing through the matter whereas gravitational waves can pass through matter almost
By
Hoffy
·
#38398
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
Since we¡¯re having do much off-topic fun, I offer the following for you history buffs: So, Hertz begins his work on the first experiments 13 Nov 1886. He finishes up his first experiment to meet the
By
AG6CX
·
#38397
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:00 PM, W0LEV wrote: "off-topic digressions" Yeah, maybe. But fascinating stuff & worth every minute of it. IMO -- Ron na2o
By
Ron na2o
·
#38396
·
|
Re: SWR vs. Resonance
And not to mention the "velocity" of neutrinos. Not quite c but darn close. Do they contain mass which would limit their velocity to something < c. If not, why don't they travel at c? Yes, deep space
By
W0LEV
·
#38395
·
|