开云体育

Manufacturers may be aware that V2 is coming, at which point V1 will be a hard sell.

Hi Eric - This may help: 1) Paste into Android Chrome browser: chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-features 2) change to [ Enabled ] FWIW, that enabled Web-Client on my Chromebook browser

I use SMA adapters on my VNWA and nanaVNA analyzers since the SMA connector is fragile. Whether male to female or female to female adapters I recommend Amphenol adapters which are a higher quality

Thanks, Larry and cho45; Wiki pointers are updated: /g/nanovna-users/wiki

I did post the results of the open earlier. Kurt is going to do more, but my executive summary is that the cal kit supplied to me is quite reasonable. Far from perfect, but quite reasonable. The fact

That sounds odd. I definitely tested saving of calibration data. Did it write anything to the console about the save failing? Did you check that it didn't save as "bnc_4.cal"? -- Rune / 5Q5R

Hi Rune thanks very much for the new release and fixing the buttons in the cal window.! I like the object picker for calibration files, but cannot save or load calibrations. I did a new cal, saved as

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been updated in the Files area of the [email protected] group. *File:* NanoVNA User

Hi Bob I have done it, as I earlier promissed and will as soon I get the report finalized and the characterization tested against the NanoVNA-Saver Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----

There are a couple of additional selections added besides "config". Under the "display", "transform" has been added with a number of possible selections. Also, under "display/format/more", a number of

David, despite agreeing to differ, might I suggest that it would be useful if someone like yourself with the appropriate calibrated professional equipment could offer to measure the three cal

Updated Wiki link: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/User-Guides

Thanks for the new release Rune. It is great to be able not only to sweep stuff but also compare vs theory/simulation. Loading Elsie S2P Files After some experimentation I think I am able to load

I would disagree. SDR-KITS sell a reasonable SMA female calibration kit for ?67.20 https://www.sdr-kits.net/calibration-information-for-DG8SAQ-VNWA-3-3EC I actually thought they did an even cheaper

Added to Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki

Keeping things in perspective it looks to me that we might be getting confused expecting to use a $50 hobby device with hobby grade calibration standards when a $5000+ instrument and professional cal

I just released 0.1.0, grab it here: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/latest This release primarily includes a number of improvements to the stability of the software. Users should

From: W5DXP Here are two SWR scans of my ZS6BKW antenna, one with the NanoVNA and the other with my $450 AIM-4170D. Attachments: VNAvsAIM.png: /g/nanovna-users/attachment/3714/0

From: Oristo [] If NanoVNA-F wants Rune's support, then they should AT LEAST provide him one, FREE. ====================== Agreed. That would be a worthwhile investment for them. Meanwhile I will make

[email protected]> wrote: If you add a female-female adapter onto the supplied short you will really mess up its properties. The short supplied has a *very* small negative delay. As far as I am