Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Added to Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/Application-Notes
By
Oristo
·
#3534
·
|
Re: New document
http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a transmission line.pdf No, that failed I know some might argue filenames are less readable, but if you use underscores or hyphens rather than
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3533
·
|
Re: New document
Your email program seems to enforce a max line length cutting the url in two If you copy the url directly from the browser it may work (if not too long) Erik.
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#3532
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Kurt, Here's the link (I hope!): http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some%20basic%20knowledge%20about%20a%20transmission%20line.pdf By the way, if I go to your top page, http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/, I don't
By
Jeff Anderson
·
#3531
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some%20basic%20knowledge%20about%20a%20transmission%20line.pdf Interesting example on how to get rid of the remaining osculation due to fringe C/L of the calibration load
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#3530
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi, It is nice to know that you made it work. neb
By
neb
·
#3529
·
|
New document
Hi Again Erik This time by creating a new mail I succeded http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a transmission line.pdf
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3528
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Kurt, it might be worth creating a fake Touchstone file with an exponentially decaying amplitude, ¡°modulated¡± with a sine wave - I *think* that would produce the right result. If you exaggerated
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3527
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Erik Thank you for the link in html I tried to change my response to html but is failed Here is another handy document of general interest http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/Some basic knowledge about a
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3526
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Oristo Thank you for your lingual suggestions I have printed your input for picking up any more suggestions. Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected]
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#3525
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi Ned would i be able to try your software please tas758 at hotmail.com
By
tas758@...
·
#3524
·
Edited
|
Re: This is the most active group/list I subscribe to
Currently, and as one of the owners, that is my take on things. I myself have also felt as if I am drinking from a fire hose (5") at times. Splitting the group would require that members subscribe to
By
Dave Daniel
·
#3523
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Me, for one; * not much space next to PC keyboard http://ormpoa.altervista.org/RFspace.JPG * hands are usually full when going to work elsewhere, making pocket-size VERY handy. * with more secure
By
Oristo
·
#3522
·
Edited
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Thanks Rune, it's working well now. The only change I would make is to make the traces on the graphs a little wider. Thanks again, Cecil at w5dxp.com
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#3521
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi Neb. PLease send me a copy of the software to palolq(at)ymail.com 73! Palo.
By
Palo
·
#3520
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi neb, TDR is work well.
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#3519
·
|
Re: This is the most active group/list I subscribe to
Don't forget there are account settings where you decide whether to receive an email for every individual post, or a single digest each day, or no emails etc etc. I receive a daily digest, but I
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#3518
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
23 : On the Uncertainties of the "Standards" - Part I @ Jeff Anderson : /g/nanovna-users/message/3294 Hello, Thank you very much for your most encouraging message ! We much appreciate
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#3517
·
|
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
the IP5306 (I2C Version) can be programmed to e.g. go to sleep after 8,16,32 and 64 seconds (8sec, 32sec modes has been reported by nanovna users). It can be programmed as well to stay on. One can buy
By
tinhead
·
#3516
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
I am still puzzling thru this. On page 3: "As seen the trace is not flowing the circumference off the Smithchart which must spiral inwards in a progressive way." .. evidently "flowing" should be
By
Oristo
·
#3515
·
|