¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: nanovna Battery Specifications
@ warren Your nanovna is ver 3.1 printed on pcb with shields for three sections. Is it the latest PCB Version. Is internal battery necessary for saving Calibration data. 73 de VU2PGB VEEN
By Praveena NG · #3282 ·
Re: Step attenuator testing versus dynamic range
Bruce What you are seeing is leakage through your attenuator. Attenuators intended for HF work and below, especially those with a network of mechanical switches and resistors, often display this
By Warren Allgyer · #3281 ·
Re: Step attenuator testing versus dynamic range
I just did the experiment here with my hp 355D 100 dB attenuator/ 10 dB steps. Attenuation is spot on and the VNA follows it just fine all the way down to 80 dB. No surprises at HF. If you have a COM
By alan victor · #3280 ·
Re: Step attenuator testing versus dynamic range
Hi Bruce. Interesting. Well, I have measured HF filters whose center frequency is less than 30 MHz and readily saw skirt responses that were 80 dB below the pass band response. Now I made sure I took
By alan victor · #3279 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Hello yin&pez, The software documentation mentions that there was a Mathematica version of the software tools, even though the Matematica version may not be uptodate, I am better at reading
By Jose Luu · #3278 ·
Step attenuator testing versus dynamic range
I have a step attenuator with a series of switches (1-20 dB assorted values) that can be combined for (in theory) up to 80 dB total attenuation. Measuring the S21 individually, the 1,2,3,6,10,and 20dB
By Bruce KX4AZ · #3277 ·
Re: Experimental 256 point FFT Firmware
Reginald could you please explain what means this equation? What means "d" and "a" variables? It seems that "f" is frequency and "t" is time, but I'm not sure what frequency and time exactly? If "f"
By QRP RX · #3276 ·
Re: Experimental 256 point FFT Firmware
leave cable in place for two decades and more. It should be changed out regularly, of course. course, for irregularities but also to measure the length physically and then relate that result to what
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Neat antenna response with the double frequency match. They did a nice job. Would be interesting to see how the radiation efficiency holds up. Alan
By alan victor · #3274 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
20 : Measurements with Core Uncertainty Hello, Allow us, please, to inform you that in the course of preparation for the final comparison between VNA and NanoVNA, which we planned to base it on
By gin&pez@arg · #3273 ·
Another modified nanoVNA software
Testing a U/V Baofeng HT antenna with my modified nanoVNA software.
By neb · #3272 ·
Re: Calibration bug in newer firmwares?
Last edy555 firmware DFU. 27-09-2019.
By DMR <bryonikater@...> · #3271 ·
Re: Calibration bug in newer firmwares?
Larry, I deleted the un-edited user guide I uploaded in favor of your version. We appreciate the effort you spent cleaning the user guide up. Props to ch045 for authoring the original guide. Herb
By hwalker · #3270 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi Rune Measuring phase is much used by me. It you e.g. want to measure using the port extension (in ps) to the end of an adaptor to which you solder leaded components then you check the S11 phase
By Kurt Poulsen · #3269 ·
Re: Calibration bug in newer firmwares?
Paul, I uploaded a manual in the files section that has the answer to that. It is authored by cho45. My version has live links. Hope this helps
By Larry Rothman · #3268 ·
Re: Experimental 256 point FFT Firmware
Solving d = a*exp(j*2*pi*f*t) with 256 measurements will give better accuracy than the 32k point FFT with far less computation. The sole limitation to the accuracy from computing a linear fit to the
By Reginald Beardsley · #3267 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
No such thing as bugs... they're all undocumented features.?
By Larry Rothman · #3266 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hello Rune, I have just uploaded V0.0.12, and it works superbly on my Win10 64Bit machine! I did have it shut down inexplicably shortly after I had first started the program, however I powered down
By Peter Mulhare · #3265 ·
Re: Experimental 256 point FFT Firmware
I'm talking about polyethylene dielectric cable. It has velocity coefficient of 0.659. Its temperature coefficient is negligible. If you cant identify polyethylene in the cable you are purchasing,
By Alan Lloyd · #3264 ·
Re: Experimental 256 point FFT Firmware
No, it depends on environment temperature and used frequency. Also, different cables uses different dielectric and VF may be significantly different. For example: - PE: solid polyethylene, VF=0.659 -
By QRP RX · #3263 ·