开云体育

That is pretty good analysis of what maybe happening. I have not noticed the "saver" posts the port baud rate. Even if the baud rate is on borderline of the system ability the RS232 protocol should be

Python, like most "interpreted" languages these days,is compiled just in time to bytecode, and there's a bytecode machine that runs the bytecode. It's very different than old style BASIC or APL

The "small issue" saver is written in python. I ditched python after I looked at the peculiar syntax "they" use. ' I many be using wrong therm, but it is "interpretive" language - similar to Basic and

Saver uses QT for graphics and UI. It's ok, but I'm glad I don't have to write GUI software (in any environment). For myself, I use scikit-rf for the math and matplotlib.pyplot for graphics. scikit-rf

You are clearly an example of a well mannered communicator and a valuable member of this community. /s /g/NanoVNAV2/topic/91701403

Thanks, it looks as my initial evaluation of "saver' software was correct. Now there are at least three optional software applications replacing it .... But that sometime happens - one picks a tool to

[image: image.png] It can be done, definitely, with some Python skills. Myself, I dislike Python, and so modified other free software: HamVna, originally by VE3NEA, using Lazarus FPC to compile the

YES

We needed the SPICE model to simulate the behavior of an entire broadband preamplifier.

I asked because I didn't even know that my old version had that capability (0.3.6).. It does, though (see attached). But like you, I got the error when trying to do it. looking at the traceback:

I would like to see both S11 (SWR) and |S11| (Impedance) in same graph . Can that be done ? PS Because of recent experience in this forum I feel I need to state this - please force yourself to simply

Anne...It sees as though you have not read the cause and the solution to your predicament. There have been several people who clearly describe how do do what you need to do...

Jim, If you work solely in the realm of s-parameters (e.g. characterizing your load in terms of S11, etc.), you might not need to create a SPICE model, depending upon what your goal is. Mini-circuits

Hello I appeal to your wisdom. It's on the sidelines of nanoVNA but some participants in this forum seem to me to know a lot of things, which is not the case everywhere With a circuit as attached

Gosh, just interpreting measurement results from a transformer with professional measurements from the mfr is non trivial Consider a minicircuits 1:4 or 1:9 or 1:1 transformer. The S-parameters are

OUT!? I hope so. This isn't the first time that I have thought that Anne is just another "Karen", looking for something to whine about. Doug -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast

QUOTE: Many OM have big illusions about the capabilities that transformers and other balun unun etc. can have. generally more or less wound on a ferromagnetic core. Making measurements on these

I'm not sure Anne is really looking for an answer. Based on her responses, it sounds like she just wants to whine about something. Anybody that doesn't support her position is obviously wrong, and

You cannot update from the program, just check if there's a newer version available, but VERSION_URL has changed recently from

Is that connecting to github from within NanoVNA-Saver? Or some other way to connect to github? My manky old (aug 2020) copy has this in the about.py (below) and doesn't have any way to update from