开云体育

Erik, The latest edy555 release says the scan command supports more than 101 points: 0.2.0-20190928 edy555 released this 4 hours ago in-device TDR support (contributed by @cho45) add scan command for

John, Thanks for the comparisons. Until I can afford a Fieldfox N9913A (like never!), based on comparative results like yours and my own end user tests, I'll trudge along happily with the NanoVNA for

Hello Norbert, thank you for trying out the software! The VSWR plot is set by default to only show values up to a max of 25 - and the "draw lines" command isn't *yet* clever enough to draw a line to a

David The scan command implemented by edy555 can scan max 101 points. I tried to convince him otherwise but failed. Erik PD0EK

Hi Peter, after much popular demand, it's now hiding at the bottom of the readme on the GitHub page. Also available at the bottom of the "project homepage" (which is a nice looking version of the

Sounds good! If your firmware has similar / compatible commands, there shouldn't be any problems with it. I can't vouch for future releases, of course, as I develop for the NanoVNA I happen to have

I utilized an attenuator and a band-reject filter today to compare results of the nanoVNA with a Keysight analyzer: https://ae5x.blogspot.com/2019/09/nanovna-vs-keysight-n9913a-at-hf.html The results

It may be that there is a problem with my statement. We are currently testing nanovna-saver and nanovna-f, and it seems that they do not need to be modified to be compatible.Of course, we don't want

I do wonder whether with all the changes being proposed, you'll end up with something so expensive and esoteric that no-one will be able to afford it! Multi-board, plug-in processors, exotic

I'd have wished they'd contact me about it instead, but as it's open source, they are of course free to use the code. I may need to make sure they don't reuse the name, though, so there isn't

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 20:00, yza <yzaVNA@...> wrote: 19 : "true value" - also : @Dr. David Kirkby : > /g/nanovna-users/message/3207 > > Hello, > > We both thank you very much

The NanoVNA firmware (as I understand it) assumes that the SMA Short, Open, and Load standards are ideal, with the single exception of defining the Open to have a C0 50 femtofarads. I was wondering --

I conducted a small test with IP5303. IP5303 does not work longer than 30 seconds with a load that consumes less than 65 milliamps. Nanovna consumes 90-110mA. With such a current consumption, IP5303

Hi, That's for you : @edy555 edy555 released this 2 hours ago in-device TDR support (contributed by @cho45) add scan command for multisegment scan excess 101 points fixed invalid sweep at the narrow

digit255, Larry addressed this topic a couple of days ago: " Larry Rothman Sep 26 #3138 As hugen mentioned yesterday, he is thinking of re-integrating (merging?) the larger fonts with his current

Hi Rune, I tested a BP-filter and I am wondering why the VSWR plot is interrupted. If you take a look at the attached screenshot, there is no VSWR line from about 268MHz till 846MHz. A tested

Not yet but forum member hugen is looking into something to help with this. Stay tuned...may take a week or two.

Bo I am the owner of RFzero (THANK YOU!) and of three, soon to be four, Nanovnas. While it does not fundamentally alter the discussion here, The Nanovna only has two frequency ranges: 55kHz to 300 MHz

Rune wrote: " I'd have wished they'd contact me about it instead, but as it's open source, they are of course free to use the code. I may need to make sure they don't reuse the name, though, so there

Is there build firmware with battery indicator, 1500 MHz and big font ? I only found with small font.