Re: Annotated nanoVNA menu diagram
That menu is updated to correct link bugs: http://ormpoa.altervista.org/Hnano.htm Its associated help file has been improved but not updated to address functionality added since "original" firmware;
By
Oristo
·
#3058
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Rune, I really appreciate the work you¡¯re doing¡ especially the .exe files. Radios I understand, but ¡°compiling¡± and those odd prerequisites are way above my pay grade. ? Paul M0GJL
By
Paul Brodie
·
#3057
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Great to hear, Paul! I'm certainly not intentionally doing anything to make it more difficult to run :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R
By
Rune Broberg
·
#3056
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
NanoVNA-Saver runs OK on my old bog standard Acer 64 bit laptop running Win 7 home premium. The only glitch I have is AVG has to check out a file before letting me run the latest release for the first
By
Paul Brodie
·
#3055
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Hi George, I'm not suggesting you need to upgrade to Windows 10 - as mentioned, the app is built on and runs on Windows 7. I don't know anything about Framework 4.0 or Framework 3.5, but a quick look
By
Rune Broberg
·
#3054
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Rune, You are doing fine work. Keep it up. But I hope you can understand the frustration of not being able to run the software on the many laptops and other computers that have not been upgraded to
By
George
·
#3053
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver
Hi Bryan, The signs on those phase plots have *really* been bothering me. It's one of the places where it really shows how much of a newbie I am at RF measurements: I have no idea what way the phase
By
Rune Broberg
·
#3052
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Saver
Rune, Using nanoVNA-saver0.0.11 It looks like the S21 phase in the marker box is of opposite sign to the plot of S21 phase. I think the phase in the plot is correct. -- Bryan, WA5VAH
By
Bryan, WA5VAH
·
#3051
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
Yes, so if users are pissed off with a certain user then deal with the person who is CAUSING the complaints, and not the people complaining. This is not happening here, and we're pissed off with the
By
London Calling <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#3050
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
@Gary O'Neil Hello, Thank you very much for your kind interest on our Work! We much appreciate that. Especially, the most encouraging guess also made by you about "missing terms". Very interesting
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#3049
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
Because I got the same warning from moderator Dave Daniel (via email), I want to hold the ball flat... But: In my opinion a moderator has to prevent the forum users from spam. Now my remarks to the
By
Wolfgang Kiefer
·
#3048
·
Edited
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Rune, Excellent... Very good, that is a very nice benefit. Alan
By
alan victor
·
#3047
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
And if I disappear from this group, you all know what has happened. A false god with a mouse and delete key got rid me ;-) Let that be an informative lesson if it happens. 73 de Andy
By
London Calling <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#3046
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Hi Alan, one of the features of NanoVNA-Saver - the prime one, really, from my point of view - is the ability to sweep many more than 101 points. I think I've used it up to 20200 points at one time,
By
Rune Broberg
·
#3045
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
Hi George (and others), the .exe for NanoVNA-Saver is built on Windows 7 - on a virtual machine that's used for nothing else. It has the build tools installed, but otherwise is just a (fully updated)
By
Rune Broberg
·
#3044
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Hello, Allow us, please, to point out that: The notion of error bounds (in the plural, since they are two -implicitly, but definitely real numbers, which are the two estimated| |computed real numbers,
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#3043
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
ps... For the record, I value Dave K's content. He seems a decent chap and I'd buy him a drink anytime. I just don't quite like the presentation of the messages in a hobbyist forum. I don't go
By
London Calling <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#3042
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Hello Yza; I admire and appreciate your persistence, as well your desire to stay on topic. I suspect this discussion is far above most on this list... myself included. There may be a few whose
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#3041
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
Hello, Allow us, please, to inform the interested reader and/or contributor that we shall copy -"just in case"- sometime later, all of our messages from here to out there:
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#3040
·
|
Re: Saver with Win7
One other note Rune. And others can comment in if I am off base. After thinking about this a bit more, there may be an issue in obtaining GD and what is known as differential group delay accurately
By
alan victor
·
#3039
·
|